Former Officials Seek U.S. Disclosure on Alleged Israeli Nuclear Theft

Victor Gilinsky, third from left, is sworn in as one of the first Nuclear Regulatory Commission members in 1975. Gilinsky and veteran U.S. atomic insider Roger Mattson last week said revealing classified findings on a decades-old alleged nuclear theft by Israel could help support Washington's current diplomacy.
National Journal
Diane Barnes
April 21, 2014, 10:17 a.m.

Two former atom­ic of­fi­cials say re­veal­ing U.S. find­ings on a dec­ades-old al­leged nuc­le­ar theft by Is­rael may bol­ster Wash­ing­ton’s present-day dip­lomacy.

De­clas­si­fy­ing all in­vest­ig­at­ive data on the 1960s-era dis­ap­pear­ance of weapon-grade urani­um from a Pennsylvania atom­ic plant could boost U.S. cred­ib­il­ity in cur­rent nuc­le­ar ne­go­ti­ations, former Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion of­fi­cials Vic­tor Gil­in­sky and Ro­ger Matt­son ar­gued in e-mail re­sponses to ques­tions from Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire.

In an art­icle pub­lished last week by the Bul­let­in of the Atom­ic Sci­ent­ists, they said pub­lic de­tails have already cast sus­pi­cion on Is­rael, which also is widely be­lieved to pos­sess an un­ac­know­ledged atom­ic ar­sen­al.

By with­hold­ing data and pub­licly down­play­ing any Is­raeli link to the highly en­riched urani­um lost in Apollo, Penn., the United States ap­pears to have ac­ted in sup­port of Is­rael’s atom­ic policies, the au­thors said in the com­ments provided to GSN. They said the stance has un­der­mined Wash­ing­ton’s cred­ib­il­ity as it presses oth­er coun­tries to curb their sens­it­ive atom­ic activ­it­ies.

“We’ve lost a great deal of re­spect around the world on the sub­ject of non­pro­lif­er­a­tion,” Gil­in­sky told GSN. Cit­ing one ex­ample, the former NRC com­mis­sion­er said Wash­ing­ton’s re­luct­ance to openly dis­cuss Is­rael’s nuc­le­ar activ­it­ies has hampered the U.S. abil­ity to overtly press its Middle East­ern ally to par­ti­cip­ate in a planned con­fer­ence on elim­in­at­ing weapons of mass de­struc­tion from the Middle East.

“The pres­id­ent doesn’t even ac­know­ledge that Is­rael has nuc­le­ar weapons, which means no one in the gov­ern­ment can, either,” he told GSN. “Lev­el­ing on [this] af­fair, pain­ful as it might be in the short run, would be a step to­ward what you might call a real­ity-based policy in this area.”

For dis­clos­ure to be likely, though, Pres­id­ent Obama must “see it in his polit­ic­al be­ne­fit to do so,” Gil­in­sky wrote. “If he wanted to, he could do it at any time, but I am not hold­ing my breath.”

Still, there is no con­sensus that Is­rael ob­tained the urani­um that went miss­ing from the fa­cil­ity op­er­ated by Nuc­le­ar Ma­ter­i­als and Equip­ment Cor­por­a­tion. Com­pany head Za­l­man Sha­piro has con­sist­ently denied any trans­fer, and in­vest­ig­at­ive journ­al­ist Sey­mour Her­sh has con­ten­ded that the plant gradu­ally lost the ma­ter­i­al in the course of routine op­er­a­tions.

Ac­cord­ing to Matt­son, dis­clos­ing all U.S. find­ings on the dis­ap­pear­ance would serve Wash­ing­ton’s in­terest, even if Is­rael was not the per­pet­rat­or.

He ar­gued in an e-mail that in dia­logue with na­tions such as Ir­an and North Korea, “it is im­port­ant for all sides to come to the table openly and hon­estly, as they de­clare their vari­ous in­terests in the deal they are try­ing to strike.”

“If full de­clas­si­fic­a­tion of the dec­ades-old doc­u­ments proves Amer­ica has already told the truth, so much the bet­ter. If it does not, then let’s atone for past mis­takes and go back to the ne­go­ti­at­ing table re­freshed by the ex­per­i­ence,” he wrote.

In 1976, the CIA in­formed NRC of­fi­cials that hun­dreds of pounds of U.S. urani­um had likely ended up “in Is­raeli bombs” after go­ing miss­ing years earli­er, Gil­in­sky and Matt­son said in their art­icle pub­lished on Thursday.

The sup­port­ing evid­ence be­hind that con­clu­sion re­mains a secret. The former NRC of­fi­cials, though, said the re­dac­tion of any in­crim­in­at­ing in­form­a­tion from de­clas­si­fied case doc­u­ments is “a back­han­ded ad­mis­sion of the per­suas­ive­ness of the CIA’s evid­ence.”

The plant’s “own­ers and ex­ec­ut­ives had ex­tremely close ties to Is­rael, in­clud­ing to high Is­raeli in­tel­li­gence and nuc­le­ar of­fi­cials. Is­rael had strong motives to ob­tain the highly en­riched urani­um be­fore it was pro­du­cing enough plutoni­um for weapons,” they ad­ded.

What We're Following See More »
IN ADDITION TO DNC AND DCCC
Clinton Campaign Also Hacked
6 hours ago
THE LATEST
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
AFFECTS NOVEMBER ELECTIONS
North Carolina Voter ID Law Struck Down
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The US Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday overturned North Carolina's 2013 voter ID law, saying it was passed with “discriminatory intent." The decision sends the case back to the district judge who initially dismissed challenges to the law. "The ruling prohibits North Carolina from requiring photo identification from voters in future elections, including the November 2016 general election, restores a week of early voting and preregistration for 16- and 17-year-olds, and ensures that same-day registration and out-of-precinct voting will remain in effect."

Source:
NORTH DAKOTA TO ILLINOIS
Massive Oil Pipeline Approved for the Midwest
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

An oil pipeline almost as long as the much-debated Keystone XL has won final approval to transport crude from North Dakota to Illinois, traveling through South Dakota and Iowa along the way. "The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers gave the final blessing to the Dakota Access pipeline on Tuesday. Developers now have the last set of permits they need to build through the small portion of federal land the line crosses, which includes major waterways like the Mississippi and the Missouri rivers. The so-called Bakken pipeline goes through mostly state and private land."

Source:
×