The Navy Just Turned Seawater Into Jet Fuel

With a stable and, hopefully, clean electricity source, seawater-based fuel could reduce dependence on oil.

National Journal
Patrick Tucker, Defense One
See more stories about...
Patrick Tucker, Defense One
April 10, 2014, 1:03 p.m.

An­noun­cing a ma­jor break­through, Navy re­search­ers for the first time have con­ver­ted sea­wa­ter in­to CO2 and hy­dro­gen, which could be used to pro­duce jet fuel with­in a dec­ade.

In the next sev­en to ten years, the mil­it­ary will be able to run jets, ships, and oth­er vehicles on a fuel de­rived from sea­wa­ter, ac­cord­ing to Heath­er Wil­lauer, a re­search chem­ist with the Nav­al Re­search Labor­at­ory or NRL.

“It has to meet mil­it­ary spe­cific­a­tions to go in­to a jet,” Wil­lauer said, at the an­nu­al Sea Air Space Expo near Wash­ing­ton, D.C., on Tues­day. “We haven’t ac­tu­ally made it to the spe­cific­a­tions stage yet. But we know we’re in the hy­dro-car­bon re­gion and it shouldn’t be very dif­fi­cult to meet that spe­cific­a­tion.”

The break­through, though im­press­ive, does not mean that we will be filling jets and ships with sea­wa­ter in the very near fu­ture. The fixed-bed cata­lys­is pro­cess Wil­lauer and her team used to re­cov­er the hy­dro­gen and the CO2 from the sea­wa­ter is highly en­ergy-in­tens­ive, re­quir­ing al­most twice as much elec­tri­city to con­vert the wa­ter in­to fuel com­pon­ents as the pro­cess yields in terms of power. Cata­lys­is is a pro­cess that com­bines chem­ic­als, en­ergy and pres­sure to ac­cel­er­ate chem­ic­al re­ac­tions. At cur­rent en­ergy pri­cing, the cost of the fuel is between $3 to $7 per gal­lon. Wil­lauer says the num­bers should get bet­ter in the years ahead.

With a stable and, hope­fully, clean elec­tri­city source, sea­wa­ter-based fuel could re­duce de­pend­ence on oil or oth­er pol­lut­ing fuel sources, first in the mil­it­ary and then else­where. “The idea is really from a lo­gist­ics stand­point, you’re no longer de­pend­ent on for­eign fossil fuel,” said Wil­lauer. “You can make fuel where and when you need so you can stay on sta­tion, and it el­ev­ates that bur­den cost of fuel, of car­ry­ing it to dif­fer­ent parts of the world.”

What We're Following See More »
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
2 days ago

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
2 days ago

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
1 days ago

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
23 hours ago

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.