Syria’s government has stopped transferring chemical arms to a coastal pickup point, citing threats from a nearby rebel incursion, Reuters reports.
Shipments of warfare chemicals into Syria’s Latakia province halted after March 20, the United Nations indicated on Thursday. To explain the stoppage, Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime referenced an opposition offensive launched around that time near the provincial capital, where foreign vessels are taking the materials for destruction outside the war-devastated nation.
Assad’s chief U.N. delegate said the suspension may force additional lags in a schedule for relinquishing the government’s chemical stockpile. Damascus agreed to support the arsenal’s dismantlement after an August nerve-gas strike raised the prospect of foreign military intervention, and international authorities are pushing to fully eliminate the hazardous materials by the end of June.
Speaking to journalists on Thursday, Syrian Ambassador Bashar Jaafari said disarmament efforts would fall further behind schedule “unless the security situation evolves in the right direction.”
U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq, though, said overseers pressed Assad’s government “to resume [chemical] movements as soon as possible in order to meet the timelines.”
Sigrid Kaag, the international disarmament effort’s special coordinator, said Damascus earlier this week communicated an intention to restart shipments to the Latakia seaport “in coming days,” according to participants in a U.N. Security Council briefing on Thursday.
Kaag reportedly said that if shipments restarted right away, it would still be possible to finish removing the chemicals this month and fully eliminate them by June. She added, though, that the schedule is growing more daunting, according to insiders.
Shipping out materials now packaged at three sites would bring the portion of removed stocks to roughly 90 percent, envoys quoted Kaag as saying.
Meanwhile, rebels said Assad’s forces on Thursday released warfare chemicals on the Damascus suburb of Jobar, Reuters reported separately. Earlier this week, the government said opposition forces in the neighborhood were plotting a chemical attack.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.