Could Iran-Russia Deal Bring More Sanctions?

An administration official says the United States has raised concerns and will take necessary action.

An Iranian clerric walks past a mural on the wall of the former U.S. embassy, apparently undaunted by media reports of potential airstrikes by the US if relations between the two countries deteriorates further February 22, 2007 in Tehran, Iran.
National Journal
Jordain Carney
April 4, 2014, 11:53 a.m.

The already-com­plex task of reach­ing a long-term agree­ment on Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram could get a little more com­plic­ated.

Re­ports earli­er this week sug­ges­ted that Rus­sia and Ir­an are work­ing on an oil-for-goods trade deal worth $20 bil­lion. Such a deal could in­volve Ir­an selling Rus­sia 500,000 bar­rels of oil a day, in ex­change for equip­ment in­clud­ing met­al and food.

“If such a deal were to hap­pen, it would be in­con­sist­ent with the “¦ joint plan of ac­tion,” a seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial told re­port­ers Fri­day.

Un­der the in­ter­im agree­ment — reached by the United States, United King­dom, Rus­sia, France, China, and Ir­an — Ir­an is not sup­posed to ex­port, on av­er­age, more than 1 mil­lion bar­rels a day.

The of­fi­cial ad­ded that they have no in­form­a­tion that the Rus­sia-Ir­an deal has been im­ple­men­ted, but said if it is, it could po­ten­tially trig­ger sanc­tions.

“If it in fact was sanc­tion­able, we would take the ap­pro­pri­ate ac­tions,” the of­fi­cial said, adding that the United States has voiced its con­cerns about the deal.

Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Bob Cork­er, in re­sponse to re­port of the Rus­sia-Ir­an deal, said that “the ad­min­is­tra­tion must be pre­pared to re­store all sanc­tions if Ir­an cheats.”

Dip­lo­mats are ex­pec­ted to head back to Vi­enna next week to con­tin­ue dis­cus­sions aimed at reach­ing a long-term agree­ment.

But the of­fi­cial said that ne­go­ti­at­ors aren’t ex­pec­ted to start draft­ing the fi­nal agree­ment un­til May, and are pre­par­ing “to dive much more deeply in­to what a com­pre­hens­ive agree­ment might look like on pa­per.”

What We're Following See More »
11 HOUSE MEMBERS NOW BEHIND HIM
Two Committee Chairs Endorse Trump
12 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Two powerful House members—Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA) and Veterans Affairs Committee Chair Jeff Miller (R-FL)—are throwing their support behind Donald Trump.

Source:
BUT WOULD HE THROW THE CHAIR?
Bobby Knight: Trump Would Drop the Bomb Just Like Truman
12 hours ago
THE LATEST
LAST PLACE
Trump Still Struggling for Endorsements
15 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
MORE INDEPENDENTS, FEWER SUPERDELEGATES
Sanders Could Force Changes to Nominating Process
18 hours ago
THE LATEST

There are not "ongoing, direct conversations between" the Bernie Sanders camp and the Hillary Clinton camp regarding "the platform or rules changes," but Sanders "is already making his opening arguments" about those issues on the stump. Sanders is putting "complaints about closed primaries" atop his stump speeches lately, and figures to start a "conversation about the role of superdelegates in the nominating process." He said, “Our goal, whether we win or we do not win, is to transform the Democratic Party."

Source:
‘LUCIFER IN THE FLESH’
Boehner Says He Wouldn’t Vote for Cruz
19 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Well, this is unsubtle. Former Speaker John Boehner called Ted Cruz "lucifer in the flesh," adding that he "never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life." Boehner has endorsed John Kasich, but he said he'd vote for Donald Trump over Cruz. He also praised Bernie Sanders, calling him the most honest politician in the race, and predicted that Joe Biden may yet have a role to play in the Democratic contest, especially if Hillary Clinton runs into legal trouble over her emails.

Source:
×