The United Kingdom’s nuclear weapons arsenal is crucially dependent on U.S. actions, as a key bilateral agreement is up for renewal, reports the London Guardian.
At issue is the so-called Mutual Defense Agreement, first signed in 1958. Work on the latest extension of the pact was ongoing on both sides of the Atlantic as of earlier this year, according to the newspaper’s Defence and Security Blog. The agreement is key because it enables the British military to take advantage of nuclear-weapons work conducted in the United States, including the sharing of data, test results and the use of U.S. test facilities.
British politicians have previously assured the public that the country’s stockpile of Trident warheads is reliable for another two decades or so. However, the blog quotes a Royal United Services Institute report concluding that “a limited understanding of warhead aging” makes precise estimates difficult.
In essence, the U.K. arsenal “will depend more upon external rather than internal factors,” the London-based think tank’s analysis concludes.
“Chief amongst these external factors will be the U.S. warhead program, which provides many key components of the U.K. arsenal,” according to the think tank.
In other words, how the U.S. nuclear complex proceeds in maintaining and modernizing Washington’s arsenal could affect the U.K. deterrent force.
“The U.K. may have no more luck predicting the future of the U.S. program than it does the reliability of its own arsenal,” the think tank report reads. “The U.S. program is currently in flux, and is likely to remain so for the foreseeable future.”
Replacing the warheads would take roughly 17 years and cost the equivalent of approximately $6.65 billion at today’s prices, according to the Guardian article. Britain plans to reduce its stockpile of 225 Trident warheads to 180 or less, with up to 120 operationally available for the country’s Vanguard submarine fleet, the blog quotes a 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review as saying.
What We're Following See More »
Concerned that she's become too divisive, "Democrats on Capitol Hill are discussing whether Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should step down as Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman before the party’s national convention in July. ... Wasserman Schultz has had an increasingly acrimonious relationship with the party’s other presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, and his supporters, who argue she has tilted the scales in Clinton’s favor." The money quote, from a Democratic senator who backs Clinton: “There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on." Meanwhile, Newsweek takes a look at why no one seems to like Wasserman Schultz.
"The U.S. House of Representatives plans to vote Wednesday on a Republican bill that would block the District of Columbia from spending locally raised tax revenue without congressional approval, prompting President Obama to pledge to veto it. In issuing the veto threat on Tuesday, the Obama White House made one of the strongest statements to date in support of the District’s attempt to win financial independence from Congress."
When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage.
Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."
Bernie Sanders "signed a letter Tuesday morning requesting a full and complete check and recanvass of the election results in Kentucky ... where he trails Hillary Clinton by less than one-half of 1 percent of the vote. The Sanders campaign said it has asked the Kentucky secretary of state to have election officials review electronic voting machines and absentee ballots from last week's primary in each of the state's 120 counties.