Military Sexual-Assault Verdicts Revive Debate on Hill

Critics said the cases underscore the need for further reforms.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, D-NY attends a press conference calling for the creation of an independent military justice system to deal with sexual harassment and assault in the military, in the Russell Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on February 6, 2014. 
National Journal
Jordain Carney
March 21, 2014, 10:24 a.m.

Con­tro­ver­sial de­cisions in two sep­ar­ate cases this week re­ignited the sexu­al-as­sault battle on Cap­it­ol Hill.

In the first closely watched case, a mil­it­ary judge on Thursday rep­rim­anded Brig. Gen. Jef­frey Sin­clair and ordered him to give up $20,000 in pay after ad­mit­ting to adul­tery — with a wo­men he su­per­vised — as well as in­ap­pro­pri­ate re­la­tion­ships with two oth­er wo­men. Sin­clair will serve no pris­on time, and the fi­nal res­ult is a far cry from sexu­al-as­sault charges that were dropped and could have res­ul­ted in a life sen­tence.

A mil­it­ary judge also found Joshua Tate, a former Nav­al Academy foot­ball play­er, not guilty of sexu­al as­sault on Thursday. Tate has agreed to resign from the academy, but many were not sat­is­fied with his pun­ish­ment.

The Pentagon has been un­der a bar­rage of cri­ti­cism from out­side groups, mem­bers of Con­gress, and at times even it­self over its hand­ling of mil­it­ary sexu­al-as­sault cases.

But Rear Adm. John Kirby, the Pentagon’s press sec­ret­ary, said the back-to-back rul­ings hadn’t changed Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel’s be­lief that the chain of com­mand should be in­cluded in de­cid­ing wheth­er a case is pro­sec­uted.

“There are plenty of oth­er cases that go all the way to tri­al and get con­vic­tions,” Kirby said. “And look, pro­sec­u­tions and con­vic­tions, while im­port­ant in terms of hold­ing people ac­count­able, that’s not the ul­ti­mate goal here. The ul­ti­mate goal here is zero sexu­al as­saults in the mil­it­ary.”

Pentagon of­fi­cials have widely cri­ti­cized a bill by Sen. Kirsten Gil­librand to re­move com­mand­ers from that pro­cess. The New York Demo­crat failed to over­come a pro­ced­ur­al vote 55-45, but she has vowed to try again dur­ing the months-long pro­cess of ham­mer­ing out the an­nu­al de­fense bill.

And Gil­librand said the Sin­clair de­cision un­der­lines why her le­gis­la­tion is needed.

“It’s not only the right thing to do for our men and wo­men in uni­form, but would also mit­ig­ate is­sues of un­due com­mand in­flu­ence that we have seen in many tri­als over the last year,” she said.

Nancy Par­rish, the pres­id­ent of Pro­tect Our De­fend­ers, backed the sen­at­or’s ef­forts, call­ing the Sin­clair case “a clear ex­ample of why nine out of 10 sexu­al-as­sault vic­tims nev­er re­port their at­tacks.”¦ This case demon­strates how high-rank­ing bad, ab­us­ive, and even un­law­ful be­ha­vi­or is tol­er­ated. The level of tol­er­ance is too of­ten dic­tated by the num­ber of stars you have on your shoulders.”

But Sarah Feld­man, spokes­wo­man for Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill — whose sexu­al-as­sault le­gis­la­tion passed the Sen­ate earli­er this month — said that while the Sin­clair case is “ob­vi­ously a com­plic­ated one,” it also proves that “com­mand­ers are of­ten more ag­gress­ive than pro­sec­utors in pur­su­ing pro­sec­u­tions and vet­ting these cases.”

The sen­at­or’s of­fice has ar­gued that if the case had been handled by pro­sec­utors alone, the rape charge would not have been brought for­ward.

And al­though Rep. Mike Turn­er, the co­chair of the Mil­it­ary Sexu­al As­sault Pre­ven­tion Caucus, doesn’t back Gil­librand’s le­gis­la­tion, the Ohio Re­pub­lic­an said he is “deeply dis­ap­poin­ted” and that the Sin­clair case is an ex­ample of why an in­crease is needed for man­dat­ory min­im­um sen­tences in sexu­al-as­sault and sexu­al-mis­con­duct cases. 

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
14 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
15 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
19 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×