Secretary of State John Kerry warned Wednesday that the ongoing crisis in Ukraine could “get ugly fast if the wrong choices are made. And it can get ugly in multiple directions.”
Kerry’s comments came as part of his testimony before a House Appropriations subcommittee about the department’s fiscal 2015 budget request.
And, not surprisingly, Ukraine quickly came up.
Republican Rep. Kay Granger, the chairwoman of the the State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Subcommittee, said in her opening statement that “the situation continues with no resolution in sight” despite Kerry’s work.
But the secretary is prepared to try, and try again. He announced he’ll travel to London on Friday to meet with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov after a series of phone calls. The meeting comes two days before an expected Crimean referendum.
“Nothing justifies a military intervention that the world has witnessed. There are many other legitimate ways to address Russia’s concerns,” Kerry said during Wednesday’s hearing. But he added that the administration recognizes “Russia has interests in Crimea.”
The administration has already announced it will issue visa bans and fiscal sanctions against individuals it believes are responsible for the crisis in Crimea and for undermining the Ukrainian government.
But Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff said he, like many members of Congress, believes that further sanctions are necessary, adding, “It’s clear that they’re going forward with the referendum, and probably annexation, under the barrel of a gun.”
And while Kerry was hesitant to outline what further steps the administration could take, he noted, “Russia has challenges of its own, and I’m not sure they need to have the kind of economic constraints that may be following, depending on the decisions they make.”
Congressional Republicans have criticized the Obama administration for playing what they view as a weak foreign policy hand in response not only on Russia’s incursion into Crimea, but also on Syria, the Iran negotiations, and a nuclear-weapons treaty that was part of a broad effort to restart U.S.-Russian relations.
But Kerry pressed back on that narrative, saying: “The reset with Russia was not just a pushing of a button and saying, ‘Oh, everything is going to be terrific.’ The reset was an effort to find those things we could cooperate on, understanding, of course, that with Russia, we’re going to have major kinds of philosophical “¦ differences.”
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.