Giving Aid to Ukraine Is About to Get a Lot More Complicated

A woman cries as she stay on Kiev's Independence Square on February 25, 2014. Ukraine issued an arrest warrant Monday for ousted president Viktor Yanukovych over the 'mass murder' of protesters and appealed for $35 billion in Western aid to pull the crisis-hit country from the brink of economic collapse. The dramatic announcements by the ex-Soviet nation's new Western-leaning team -- approved by parliament over a chaotic weekend that saw the pro-Russian leader go into hiding -- came as a top EU envoy arrived in Kiev to buttress its sudden tilt away from Moscow.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
See more stories about...
Stacy Kaper
March 11, 2014, 2:12 p.m.

A push by Sen­ate Demo­crats to tie a con­tro­ver­sial fund­ing pro­vi­sion to a Ukraine-aid bill could thwart the pop­u­lar res­ol­u­tion’s chances of be­com­ing law.

Sen. Robert Men­en­dez, chair­man of the For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee, plans to bring a com­pre­hens­ive Ukraine pack­age be­fore the pan­el Wed­nes­day that in­cludes a meas­ure to em­power the In­ter­na­tion­al Mon­et­ary Fund to of­fer more aid to na­tions in crisis like Ukraine.

“My goal would be to have an IMF pro­vi­sion in it, and we will see where the de­bate lies as a res­ult of that,” Men­en­dez said Tues­day. “It’s nev­er over till it’s ex­actly over, but we should be there.”

A Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship aide said that the con­tro­versy over the IMF pro­vi­sion — which is sup­por­ted by the ad­min­is­tra­tion but op­posed by many Re­pub­lic­ans — could fur­ther drag out the pro­cess and make it harder to en­act the Ukraine le­gis­la­tion be­fore law­makers leave town next week.

The House has already passed its aid pack­age for Ukraine, which did not in­clude the IMF pro­vi­sion. The cham­ber is ex­pec­ted to put up a fight over in­clud­ing it now.

A key prob­lem with in­clud­ing the IMF pro­vi­sion in the Ukraine pack­age is that Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell and House Speak­er John Boehner want to use it as lever­age with Pres­id­ent Obama, ac­cord­ing to a Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­or who asked not to be named in or­der to speak more freely. They want to trade the IMF re­form sought by the Treas­ury De­part­ment for turn­ing around a pro­posed change in the tax code that would make it harder for so­cial-wel­fare or­gan­iz­a­tions to con­trib­ute to the polit­ic­al pro­cess.

“The reas­on why it is con­tro­ver­sial is be­cause Mc­Con­nell and Boehner want the “¦ out­side con­tri­bu­tions taken care of by Treas­ury in ex­change for an IMF fix,” the sen­at­or said.

IMF fund­ing is a long-stalled pri­or­ity of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, which wants to trans­fer money from the IMF’s crisis ac­count to its gen­er­al fund. A change is in­ten­ded to com­plete a set of re­forms from 2010, which could al­low the IMF to in­crease re­sources avail­able for aid and in­crease the re­spons­ib­il­ity and in­flu­ence of emer­ging eco­nom­ies at the IMF.

“I’m con­cerned that all you do is a pack­age that has a very short be­ne­fit and doesn’t deal with some of the crit­ic­al is­sues,” Men­en­dez said of the House bill.

Sev­er­al mem­bers of the For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee from both parties said Tues­day that they ex­pec­ted some ver­sion of the IMF pro­vi­sion to be in­cluded in the aid pack­age, but said they had not been privy to the latest de­tails. And sev­er­al Re­pub­lic­ans said they would have to see the fi­nal ver­sion be­fore they could take a stance on the im­plic­a­tions of an IMF meas­ure.

Demo­crats are largely on board with the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s goal, but Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans offered mixed views.

Sens. Lind­sey Gra­ham of South Car­o­lina and Johnny Isak­son of Geor­gia — neither of whom serve on the For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee — said they sup­port in­clud­ing the IMF pro­vi­sion.

Gra­ham said the re­turn on in­vest­ment for the United States is worth it.

“If you don’t want to use mil­it­ary force all the time, which I do not; if you want to get ahead of dan­ger­ous move­ments in the world; if you want to re­in­force people who are help­ful to you change be­ha­vi­or; IMF is the way to do it,” he said. “I hope it is in the pack­age.”

But Gra­ham ad­ded he knows some in his party are wary of for­eign aid.

Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Ron John­son of Wis­con­sin, who serves on the com­mit­tee, said the pro­vi­sion was un­ne­ces­sar­ily adding par­tis­an drama to an is­sue where U.S. poli­cy­makers should be “uni­fied” and “speak with one voice” in sup­port­ing the Ukraine and con­demning Rus­sia for its in­cur­sion.

“We shouldn’t be do­ing that. There are many con­tro­ver­sial ele­ments to that.”¦ You are re­du­cing power, you are in­creas­ing fund­ing, there are a num­ber of as­pects of that bill that con­ser­vat­ives would not sup­port,” he said.

Still, John­son said he needed to re­view the fi­nal de­tails be­fore de­cid­ing how he would vote.

Sen. John Mc­Cain echoed John­son’s sen­ti­ment on un­ne­ces­sary con­tro­versy. He ar­gued that al­though he sup­ports the IMF change, he be­lieves the Ukraine pack­age should be passed and fin­ished this week be­fore Con­gress ad­journs, wheth­er or not the lan­guage is in­cluded.

“It would be dis­grace­ful if we let that kind of dis­pute pre­vent the Con­gress of the United States act­ing on this,” he said. “The IMF lan­guage “¦ pales in com­par­is­on to the im­per­at­ive for us to act in light of the in­va­sion of a sov­er­eign na­tion, which is what Vladi­mir Putin has just done.”¦ I’m not go­ing to let IMF stand in the way of a re­ac­tion of Con­gress on an in­va­sion of a coun­try, and if oth­ers do, then they have their pri­or­it­ies ter­ribly skewed.”

Jordain Carney contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
×