U.S. Auditors to Nuclear Agency: Collaborate More on Securing Radiological Sites

A Transportation and Security Administration officer carries radiological-nuclear detection equipment in his backpack at Penn Station in New York City in January. Efforts by the National Nuclear Security Administration to foster better international standards for safeguarding radiological sources would benefit from more outside expertise, a new report finds.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
See more stories about...
Rachel Oswald
March 7, 2014, 7:20 a.m.

Con­gres­sion­al aud­it­ors are telling the En­ergy De­part­ment it should col­lab­or­ate more with oth­er key agen­cies on de­vel­op­ing ways to se­cure ra­di­olo­gic­al items.

The de­part­ment’s semi­autonom­ous Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion in 2012 launched a pro­ject aimed at en­cour­aging the highest stand­ards around the world in the pro­tec­tion of ci­vil­ian-sec­tor ra­di­olo­gic­al sources that might be stolen and used by ter­ror­ists to build a so-called “dirty bomb.”

The nuc­le­ar agency set up two pi­lot sites for the “ra­di­olo­gic­al se­cur­ity zone” pro­ject — one in Peru and an­oth­er in Mex­ico — but neg­lected “to com­plete some im­port­ant plan­ning and eval­u­ation steps,” the Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice con­cluded in a Thursday re­port.

NNSA of­fi­cials failed to seek in­put from “key stake­hold­ers” with rel­ev­ant ex­pert­ise, such as the In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency, State De­part­ment and Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion, GAO of­fi­cials found.

“By not fol­low­ing the pro­fes­sion­al prac­tice of early en­gage­ment of key stake­hold­ers, NNSA may have missed op­por­tun­it­ies to ob­tain and lever­age the ex­pert­ise, per­spect­ives, and re­sources of these agen­cies,” the re­port states.

For in­stance, the agency missed out on learn­ing from the U.N. nuc­le­ar watch­dog or­gan­iz­a­tion what les­sons it has learned from years spent at­tempt­ing to im­prove re­gion­al ra­di­olo­gic­al se­cur­ity prac­tices.

In the event the nuc­le­ar agency ex­pands its ra­di­olo­gic­al se­cur­ity zone ini­ti­at­ive, of­fi­cials should seek out oth­er agen­cies’ ex­pert­ise and de­vel­op a con­crete plan for eval­u­at­ing the ef­fic­acy of the vari­ous zones, the re­port said.

Con­gress re­ques­ted the GAO study in the fisc­al 2013 De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act.

What We're Following See More »
Plurality of Trump Voters Just Want to Stop Clinton
14 minutes ago

"Nearly half of American voters who support either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump for the White House said they will mainly be trying to block the other side from winning, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday." When Trump supporters were asked to give their primary reason for supporting him, 47% said to block Clinton from winning. In almost a mirror image, 46% of Clinton supporters said they were primarily out to thwart Trump.

Many GOPers Still Think Trump Can Be Brought to Heel
31 minutes ago
Trump Finance Guru Has History of Contributing to Dems
2 hours ago

"Like Donald Trump himself, the Trump campaign’s new national finance chairman has a long history of contributing to Democrats—including Hillary Clinton. Private investor Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s new campaign fundraising guru, has contributed more than $120,000" to candidates since 1995, about half of which has gone to Democrats.

Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
18 hours ago

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
20 hours ago

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"