U.S. Auditors to Nuclear Agency: Collaborate More on Securing Radiological Sites

A Transportation and Security Administration officer carries radiological-nuclear detection equipment in his backpack at Penn Station in New York City in January. Efforts by the National Nuclear Security Administration to foster better international standards for safeguarding radiological sources would benefit from more outside expertise, a new report finds.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
See more stories about...
Rachel Oswald
March 7, 2014, 7:20 a.m.

Con­gres­sion­al aud­it­ors are telling the En­ergy De­part­ment it should col­lab­or­ate more with oth­er key agen­cies on de­vel­op­ing ways to se­cure ra­di­olo­gic­al items.

The de­part­ment’s semi­autonom­ous Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion in 2012 launched a pro­ject aimed at en­cour­aging the highest stand­ards around the world in the pro­tec­tion of ci­vil­ian-sec­tor ra­di­olo­gic­al sources that might be stolen and used by ter­ror­ists to build a so-called “dirty bomb.”

The nuc­le­ar agency set up two pi­lot sites for the “ra­di­olo­gic­al se­cur­ity zone” pro­ject — one in Peru and an­oth­er in Mex­ico — but neg­lected “to com­plete some im­port­ant plan­ning and eval­u­ation steps,” the Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice con­cluded in a Thursday re­port.

NNSA of­fi­cials failed to seek in­put from “key stake­hold­ers” with rel­ev­ant ex­pert­ise, such as the In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency, State De­part­ment and Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion, GAO of­fi­cials found.

“By not fol­low­ing the pro­fes­sion­al prac­tice of early en­gage­ment of key stake­hold­ers, NNSA may have missed op­por­tun­it­ies to ob­tain and lever­age the ex­pert­ise, per­spect­ives, and re­sources of these agen­cies,” the re­port states.

For in­stance, the agency missed out on learn­ing from the U.N. nuc­le­ar watch­dog or­gan­iz­a­tion what les­sons it has learned from years spent at­tempt­ing to im­prove re­gion­al ra­di­olo­gic­al se­cur­ity prac­tices.

In the event the nuc­le­ar agency ex­pands its ra­di­olo­gic­al se­cur­ity zone ini­ti­at­ive, of­fi­cials should seek out oth­er agen­cies’ ex­pert­ise and de­vel­op a con­crete plan for eval­u­at­ing the ef­fic­acy of the vari­ous zones, the re­port said.

Con­gress re­ques­ted the GAO study in the fisc­al 2013 De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act.

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
12 hours ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
13 hours ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.