Obama Rolls Out Visa Bans in Anti-Putin Retaliation

But the administration has yet to target any individuals.

Russia's President Vladimir Putin gestures during his meeting with Kazakh president Nursultan Nazarbayev and Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko in Putin's Novo-Ogaryovo residence outside Moscow, on March 5, 2014.
National Journal
Jordain Carney
March 6, 2014, 4:44 a.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion sent Rus­sia a warn­ing shot Thursday, say­ing it will tar­get in­di­vidu­als and groups tied to the crisis in Ukraine with fin­an­cial sanc­tions and visa bans.

The State De­part­ment will block visas needed to travel to the U.S. for Ukrain­i­an and Rus­si­an in­di­vidu­als who it be­lieves have threatened the “sov­er­eignty and ter­rit­ori­al in­teg­rity of Ukraine,” White House press sec­ret­ary Jay Car­ney said.

The visa bans are in ad­di­tion to the 20 Ukrain­i­an of­fi­cials tar­geted by the de­part­ment for the gov­ern­ment’s crack­down against demon­strat­ors last month.

Pres­id­ent Obama also signed an ex­ec­ut­ive or­der that will al­low fin­an­cial sanc­tions against in­di­vidu­als and of­fi­cials who have un­der­mined the Ukrain­i­an gov­ern­ment, vi­ol­ated the coun­try’s ter­rit­ori­al in­teg­rity, mis­used state funds, or tried to take con­trol of part of the coun­try without the ap­prov­al of the gov­ern­ment in Kiev, a seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial said.

The of­fi­cial ad­ded that these sanc­tions can tar­get Ukrain­i­an and Rus­si­an in­di­vidu­als, or those who have provided sup­port or are con­trolled by them.

Car­ney called the ex­ec­ut­ive or­der “a flex­ible tool that will al­low us to sanc­tion those who are most dir­ectly in­volved in destabil­iz­ing Ukraine, in­clud­ing the mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion in Crimea.”

And though no in­di­vidu­als have yet been hit with the sanc­tions or a visa ban, an­oth­er seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial stressed, “This au­thor­ity is now in place. and we will be look­ing to use it as ap­pro­pri­ate.”

The State De­part­ment can also re­voke visas if a tar­geted in­di­vidu­al already has one. 

“We’ve been pre­par­ing very quickly this ex­ec­ut­ive or­der; we be­lieve that there need to be costs and con­sequences for Rus­sia for what they’ve already done in Crimea,” a seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial said, adding that in­di­vidu­als in­volved in the re­cent ten­sions should be “on no­tice.”

Thursday morn­ing’s an­nounce­ment is the latest move by the U.S. gov­ern­ment to try to isol­ate Rus­sia for its in­cur­sion in­to Crimea. The Pentagon an­nounced earli­er this week that it sus­pen­ded all dir­ect mil­it­ary in­volve­ment with Rus­sia.

How Thursday’s de­cision will im­pact Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin’s de­cision mak­ing is murky at best. As a seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial said earli­er this week, “We in this ad­min­is­tra­tion have made it a prac­tice to not look in­to Vladi­mir Putin’s soul.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×