How the Russian Constitution Justifies War in Ukraine

They’re protecting (perhaps recently minted) Russian citizens.

An unidentified man wearing military fatigues gestures in front of armed individuals blocking the center of Balaklava, near Sevastopol, on March 1, 2014. 
National Journal
Brian Resnick
March 3, 2014, 6:37 a.m.

While Rus­sia is be­ing heav­ily cri­ti­cized by the West for its in­cur­sion in­to Ukraine, the Rus­si­an con­sti­tu­tion does, in part, al­low for this kind of ac­tion in a sov­er­eign coun­try.

Art­icle 61, sec­tion 2 of the con­sti­tu­tion al­lows de­fi­ance of in­ter­na­tion­al laws in this situ­ation. It reads, in Eng­lish:

“The Rus­si­an Fed­er­a­tion shall guar­an­tee its cit­izens de­fense and pat­ron­age bey­ond its bound­ar­ies.”

This is the lan­guage the Rus­si­ans evoked dur­ing the 2008 war with Geor­gia. And it’s lan­guage that Rus­si­an For­eign Min­is­ter Sergey Lav­rov ref­er­enced Monday, say­ing, “We are talk­ing here about pro­tec­tion of our cit­izens and com­pat­ri­ots, about pro­tec­tion of the most fun­da­ment­al of the hu­man rights — the right to live, and noth­ing more.”

Rus­si­an au­thor­it­ies take the lan­guage of Art­icle 61 very ser­i­ously and un­com­prom­isingly. In 2008, Valery Zor­kin, the chief justice of Rus­sia’s con­sti­tu­tion­al court, penned an op-ed on how Art­icle 61 jus­ti­fied the Geor­gia in­va­sion. He wrote (trans­lated, via Google Trans­late, em­phas­is mine), “The gov­ern­ment and the pres­id­ent of Rus­sia had no oth­er way than in the strongest terms to en­sure com­pli­ance with Art­icle 61 of the Con­sti­tu­tion, which in black and white that the Rus­si­an Fed­er­a­tion shall guar­an­tee its cit­izens pro­tec­tion and pat­ron­age abroad.”

But, as the Law Lib­rary of Con­gress ex­plains in a leg­al ana­lys­is of the war, that ar­gu­ment is quickly un­der­mined by this fact, a bit of geo­pol­it­ic­al trapeze: “The large pop­u­la­tion of Rus­si­an na­tion­als was cre­ated ar­ti­fi­cially by hand­ing Rus­si­an cit­izen­ship to res­id­ents of Geor­gi­an sep­ar­at­ist re­gions,” the re­ports states.

Something sim­il­ar may now be hap­pen­ing in Ukraine. It has been re­por­ted that in the past two weeks, Rus­sia is­sued 143,000 pass­ports for Ukrain­i­ans — al­though, it’s not that these Ukrain­i­ans are be­ing forced in­to be­ing geo­pol­it­ic­al pawns. Fifty-eight per­cent of people in the Crimean Pen­in­sula (a sov­er­eign unit un­der Ukrain­i­an con­trol and land­ing zone for the Rus­si­an mil­it­ary) identi­fy as eth­nic Rus­si­ans. As this map from the BBC shows, 70 per­cent of those in Crimea sup­por­ted Ukraine’s now-ous­ted and Rus­si­an-backed Prime Min­is­ter Vikt­or Ya­nukovych. 

(Via BBC)

The Rus­si­an leg­al ar­gu­ment for war didn’t stand up to scru­tiny in 2008, and it’s un­likely to now, see­ing how the G-7 coun­tries, iden­ti­fied as the sev­en wealth­i­est in­dus­tri­al­ized na­tions in the world, have ban­ded to­geth­er in op­pos­i­tion. And as the United Na­tions states in its charter very clearly, “All Mem­bers shall re­frain in their in­ter­na­tion­al re­la­tions from the threat or use of force against the ter­rit­ori­al in­teg­rity or polit­ic­al in­de­pend­ence of any state.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4776) }}

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
1 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
21 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
×