John Kerry: Russia ‘May Not Even Remain in the G-8’ if Aggression in Ukraine Continues

The Secretary of State laid out Sunday what the U.S. can do to pressure Putin.

Heavily-armed soldiers without identifying insignia guard the Crimean parliament building next to a sign that reads: 'Crimea Russia' after taking up positions there earlier in the day on March 1, 2014 in Simferopol, Ukraine.
National Journal
Matt Berman
March 2, 2014, 5:25 a.m.

The situ­ation in Ukraine is mov­ing rap­idly. The coun­try’s in­ter­im gov­ern­ment is now call­ing up its mil­it­ary re­serves to pres­sure Rus­sia against fur­ther move­ments in­to the coun­try after the Rus­si­an Par­lia­ment gave Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin au­thor­ity to use mil­it­ary force in the area. But so far, after a short, un­spe­cif­ic state­ment from the White House on Fri­day, the U.S. re­sponse has been murky at best.

Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry tried to clear up the U.S. po­s­i­tion dur­ing a run of the Sunday show gaunt­let. And when he spoke with Dav­id Gregory on Meet the Press, he gave a sense of what the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is ac­tu­ally con­sid­er­ing to do to stop Putin from go­ing fur­ther, either in Crimea or in Ukraine as a whole.{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4775) }}

“This is an act of ag­gres­sion that is com­pletely trumped up in terms of its pre­text,” Kerry said Sunday. “It’s really 19th cen­tury be­ha­vi­or in the 21st cen­tury.” Kerry sug­ges­ted that, if Rus­sia’s ac­tions in Crimea and Ukraine con­tin­ue, the G8 will, at a min­im­um, not meet in So­chi as planned for June. The U.S. is already mak­ing plans to pull out of that sum­mit.

Kerry elab­or­ated fur­ther on the costs the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity could im­pose on Rus­sia, say­ing that the G8 coun­tries are go­ing to “isol­ate” Rus­sia, that “they’re not go­ing to en­gage with Rus­sia in a nor­mal busi­ness as usu­al man­ner.” That state­ment is not much more spe­cif­ic than any­thing else the White House has said in the last week. Kerry also men­tioned po­ten­tial as­set freezes, visa bans, and that “there could be cer­tainly dis­rup­tion of any of the nor­mal trade routine.”

Could west­ern mil­it­ary forces get in­volved? Kerry hedged the ques­tion, say­ing that the North At­lantic Coun­cil is meet­ing Sunday, but that he doesn’t “know what is ac­tu­ally on the table with re­spect to the steps they may or may not take.”

“The last thing any­body wants is a mil­it­ary op­tion in this kind of a situ­ation,” Kerry said.

“We want a peace­ful res­ol­u­tion through the nor­mal pro­cesses of in­ter­na­tion­al re­la­tions. But in the ab­sence of Pres­id­ent Putin mak­ing the right de­cision to work with the gov­ern­ment of Ukraine, to work with the west, to work with all of us, as I said a mo­ment ago, this is not about the Rus­sia and the United States. It’s about the people of Ukraine…I mean, [Rus­sia is] in dir­ect, overt vi­ol­a­tion of in­ter­na­tion­al law.”

There’s noth­ing in Kerry’s re­sponse about po­ten­tial mil­it­ary ac­tion that firmly says that the U.S. will or will not con­sider mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion. Of course mil­it­ary ac­tion is nev­er prefer­able. But right now, the U.S. seems to be keep­ing as many op­tions open as pos­sible.

That in­cludes re­mov­ing Rus­sia from the G8.

Putin’s “go­ing to lose on the in­ter­na­tion­al stage, Rus­sia is go­ing to lose, the Rus­si­an people are go­ing to lose,” if something doesn’t change, Kerry said. Putin will “lose all of the glow that came out of the Olympics,” and he’ll lose his So­chi G8 sum­mit. But then came a re­l­at­ive ham­mer: “He may not even re­main in the G8 if this con­tin­ues.”

Some Re­pub­lic­ans, in­clud­ing Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham, were already push­ing the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion Sunday to act to kick Rus­sia from the G8. Sen. Marco Ru­bio, in a Politico op-ed, wrote that “if Rus­si­an troops do not leave Ukraine im­me­di­ately, Rus­sia should be ex­pelled from [the G8] al­to­geth­er.” Pres­id­ent Obama hin­ted around the threat on Sat­urday in a 90-minute phone call with Putin him­self, say­ing that Rus­sia’s “stand­ing in the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity” was at risk.

Rus­sia has been a mem­ber of the G8 since 1998, when the group of sev­en in­dus­tri­al­ized na­tions (then the G7) ad­ded the coun­try to its sum­mit.

“The United States is united, Rus­sia is isol­ated,” Kerry said Sunday “That is not a po­s­i­tion of strength.” So far though, it’s not really clear what ac­tion the United States is “united” around. Putin, on the oth­er hand, is mov­ing ahead. Even in isol­a­tion.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×