The top official at the National Security Agency suggested that the scope of its controversial phone-data collection program could be limited to keep only information related to terrorism.
“I think there’s yet another option where you look at what data you actually need and get only that data,” NSA Director Keith Alexander said, testifying at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing Thursday.
That option, he added, assumes the U.S. can “come up with a capability that just gets those that are predicated on a terrorist communication.”
Alexander’s comments are a stark contrast to the NSA’s bulk collection of phone metadata that privacy advocates, and some members of Congress, have criticized. As a former senior intelligence official told The Washington Post last year, the NSA wanted to collect “the whole haystack” rather than “a single needle in the haystack.”
Alexander said a proposal will be submitted to Congress “over the next several weeks.” Each of the options under consideration to modify the program has its pros and cons, he said, adding that officials are focused on how the program’s “agility” would be effected.
A panel commissioned by the White House suggested last year that phone companies or a private third party should hold the metadata, but the industry has shown little interest or support for that proposal. The Obama administration is currently weighing four options on what to do with the program.
Alexander, who will retire this spring, and the NSA have been under near constant criticism since June, when media outlets began to publicly disclose U.S. intelligence-gathering programs, largely using documents provided by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.
Alexander stressed throughout the hearing that the American people need to have a better understanding of what the NSA does, and that a “reset” is needed.
What We're Following See More »
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."
President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"