Vets Bill Goes Down as Military Sexual-Assault Bills Come Up

Angry over process, Republicans withhold votes needed to get vets bill to the floor.

U.S. Bernard Sanders (I-VT) covers his face during a 2009 hearing. Sanders is considering introducing a bill that would end liability limits for the nuclear power industry in the event of a disaster.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Feb. 27, 2014, 7:37 a.m.

Re­pub­lic­ans scuttled a $21 bil­lion vet­er­ans’ pack­age in the Sen­ate on Thursday, but have agreed to al­low com­pet­ing mil­it­ary sexu­al-as­sault bills to move to the floor for votes.

The vet­er­ans’ bill from Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Ver­mont in­de­pend­ent, went down on a pro­ced­ur­al vote 56-41 be­cause Re­pub­lic­ans, denied the abil­ity to of­fer amend­ments, with­held the votes needed to get it to the floor.

Mean­while, long-stalled votes on com­pet­ing mil­it­ary sexu­al-as­sault le­gis­la­tion offered by Demo­crat­ic Sens. Kirsten Gil­librand of New York and Claire Mc­Caskill of Mis­souri are fi­nally ex­pec­ted to ad­vance.

After Re­pub­lic­ans ob­jec­ted to mov­ing for­ward with the bills earli­er in the week, Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id and Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell struck a deal late Wed­nes­day to ex­ped­ite de­bate and al­low the meas­ures to pro­ceed as early as next week.

The Gil­librand bill would re­form the mil­it­ary justice sys­tem by strip­ping com­mand­ers of the power to de­cide which sexu­al-as­sault cases are pro­sec­uted. Gil­librand has 55 votes lined up for her bill and could man­age to pass it if she can find 60 votes needed to get the le­gis­la­tion to the floor.

Mc­Caskill’s bill in­cludes a host of non­con­tro­ver­sial re­forms, in­clud­ing dis­al­low­ing a sol­dier’s good mil­it­ary char­ac­ter to be con­sidered in the de­fense of a sexu­al as­sault and meas­ures to make it easi­er for vic­tims to chal­lenge un­fair dis­charges from the ser­vice.

The Sanders bill ex­pands vet­er­ans’ be­ne­fits in edu­ca­tion and health care, and it would re­verse a cost-of-liv­ing ad­just­ment on mil­it­ary re­tir­ees’ pen­sions that was in­cluded in last year’s budget deal. Vet­er­ans’ groups strongly sup­port the le­gis­la­tion, and some cried foul at the closed pro­cess for com­plic­at­ing its chances.

Re­pub­lic­ans op­posed the bill’s off­set, which re­lied on sav­ings from the draw­down of the wars in Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan and wanted to of­fer al­tern­at­ives. But among their wish list was a vote on Ir­an sanc­tions, which Re­id said was not rel­ev­ant to the bill and would not be al­lowed.

“The Amer­ic­an Le­gion would very much like to have seen Re­id open up the bill to amend­ments, to help the bill get through the pro­cess,” said Louis Celli, a le­gis­lat­ive dir­ect­or with the group. “We would op­pose non-ger­mane amend­ments like Ir­an, but this par­tis­an­ship and games­man­ship has got to stop so that Amer­ic­an people can get the laws back that we need to help vet­er­ans.”

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
18 hours ago
THE LATEST
JOINS BUSHES, MCCAIN
Romney to Skip Convention
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

An aide to Mitt Romney confirmed to the Washington Post that the 2102 GOP nominee will not attend the Republican convention this year. He joins the two living Republican presidents, George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush, as well as 2008 nominee John McCain in skipping the event. Even among living Republican nominees, that leaves only Bob Dole who could conceivably show up. Dole did say in January that he'd prefer Trump to Ted Cruz, but his age (92) could keep him from attending.

Source:
#NEVERTRUMP
Sen. Sasse Calls for a Third Candidate
22 hours ago
THE LATEST

Sen. Ben Sasse, the most prominent elected official to declare that he's #NeverTrump, wrote an open letter on Facebook to the "majority of Americans who wonder why the nation that put a man on the moon can’t find a healthy leader who can take us forward together." Calling to mind recent conversations at a Fremont, Neb., Walmart, the senator pitted the presumptive general election battle between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton as such a "terrible choice" that there would be an appetite for another candidate to emerge. In a parenthetical aside to reporters, Sasse ruled himself out. "Such a leader should be able to campaign 24/7 for the next six months," he wrote. "Therefore he/she likely can’t be an engaged parent with little kids." Meanwhile, his colleague Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) admitted in a private recording obtained by Politico that Trump hurts his reelection chances.

Source:
×