Congress Loves Itself Some Ben Affleck

Members of both parties lauded the actor-director for his work, and John McCain enjoyed some banter.

Ben Affleck speaks during a House Armed Services Committee hearing on the Evolving Security Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Implications for U.S. National Security at Rayburn House Office Building on Dec. 19, 2012.
National Journal
Jordain Carney
Feb. 27, 2014, 6:43 a.m.

Mem­bers of Con­gress can’t agree on much of any­thing these days — but on Wed­nes­day, they made an ex­cep­tion for Ben Af­fleck, lav­ish­ing praise on the act­or-dir­ect­or for his work in Africa.

Af­fleck test­i­fied be­fore an un­usu­ally packed Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee about the Demo­crat­ic Re­pub­lic of the Congo, high­light­ing his work with the East­ern Congo Ini­ti­at­ive, a non­profit ad­vocacy or­gan­iz­a­tion he foun­ded.

Less than a minute in­to the hear­ing, Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bob Men­en­dez thanked Af­fleck, or as he and oth­er sen­at­ors pro­nounced it “Aff-lack,” for “clearly draw­ing so much at­ten­tion” to the is­sue, say­ing Af­fleck will be “long re­membered as a ser­i­ous, thought­ful act­iv­ist.”

And Re­pub­lic­an Sen. John Mc­Cain of Ari­zona, whose wife, Cindy Mc­Cain, works with Af­fleck, had a run­ning banter with the act­or, at one point in­ter­rupt­ing fel­low Re­pub­lic­an Sen. James Risch, who was com­pli­ment­ing Af­fleck on his self­less­ness, say­ing dryly, “I can as­sure you, it’s also par­tially about him.”

“That’s funny. I’ve al­ways con­sidered Sen­at­or Mc­Cain the real celebrity. That’s one thing he and I have in com­mon,” Af­fleck shot back, gar­ner­ing laughter from com­mit­tee mem­bers and at­tendees.

Af­fleck is by no means the first celebrity to ap­pear be­fore Con­gress — George Clooney had staffers trail­ing him through Dirk­sen two years ago — in what is es­sen­tially a mu­tu­ally be­ne­fi­cial situ­ation. Celebrit­ies get to tout pet pro­jects and causes, while lend­ing a mega­phone to con­gres­sion­al is­sues that would of­ten be over­looked oth­er­wise.

And des­pite the, at times, light­hearted in­ter­ac­tions — Sen. Ed­ward Mar­key of Mas­sachu­setts called him a “ho­met­own hero” be­cause of his Bo­ston roots — Af­fleck and oth­er speak­ers, in­clud­ing Rus­sell Fein­gold, a former sen­at­or and cur­rent spe­cial en­voy to the Great Lakes re­gion of Africa and the DRC, delved in­to what could be done to help the Afric­an coun­try that has dealt with dis­ease and nearly con­stant vi­ol­ence as groups fought over nat­ur­al re­sources, in­clud­ing gold and cop­per.

Fein­gold called on the United States to boost its fin­an­cial sup­port of the Congo’s elec­tions, which are ex­pec­ted to place between now and 2016.

Al­though Af­fleck began his testi­mony to a shower of cam­era-shut­ter clicks and some humble­ness — not­ing that “to state the ob­vi­ous,” he is “not a Congo ex­pert” — he did have a hand­ful of sug­ges­tions for Con­gress and the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.

His pro­pos­als ranged from main­tain­ing sup­port for Fein­gold and Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry, whom Af­fleck met with earli­er in the day, to call­ing on the U.S. Agency for In­ter­na­tion­al De­vel­op­ment to up its eco­nom­ic de­vel­op­ment in the coun­try.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
History Already Being Less Kind to Hastert’s Leadership
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."

Source:
‘STARTING FROM ZERO’
Trump Ill Prepared for General Election
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."

Source:
27TH AMENDMENT
Congress Can’t Seem Not to Pay Itself
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Far Away from Cleveland is the California GOP Staying?
5 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."

ATTORNEY MAY RELEASE THEM ANYWAY
SCOTUS Will Not Allow ‘DC Madam’ Phone Records to Be Released
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."

Source:
×