Lawmakers: When Did Defense Nominee Know of Alleged Moscow Treaty Breach?

Global Security Newswire Staff
Feb. 21, 2014, 5:22 a.m.

An Obama nom­in­ee to a seni­or Pentagon post will have to an­swer ques­tions next week on his know­ledge of al­leged Rus­si­an vi­ol­a­tions of an arms con­trol pact.

Bri­an McK­eon has been nom­in­ated to the po­s­i­tion of prin­cip­al deputy un­der­sec­ret­ary of De­fense for policy. In the buildup to next week’s Sen­ate con­firm­a­tion hear­ing, two Re­pub­lic­an law­makers have writ­ten to the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, de­mand­ing to know wheth­er the cur­rent Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Coun­cil chief of staff was aware back in 2010 that Rus­sia was sus­pec­ted of vi­ol­at­ing a nuc­le­ar-forces re­duc­tion pact, the Daily Beast re­por­ted.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion re­cently ac­know­ledged hav­ing con­cerns that Rus­sia is in breach of the 1987 In­ter­me­di­ate-Range Nuc­le­ar Forces Treaty, though it has yet to form­ally ac­cuse Mo­scow of any vi­ol­a­tion. The ap­par­ent source of con­cern is Rus­si­an test­ing of a new ground-launched cruise mis­sile, dat­ing back to 2008. The agree­ment pro­hib­its Rus­sia and the United States from pro­du­cing, stock­pil­ing or test­ing any cruise or bal­list­ic mis­siles with ranges between 300 and 3,400 miles.

In their let­ter, Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee mem­bers Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) and Ro­ger Wick­er (R-Miss.) de­man­ded to know wheth­er McK­eon was aware of the al­leged treaty breach at the time when he was act­ing as a key White House rep­res­ent­at­ive on Cap­it­ol Hill dur­ing the push to se­cure Sen­ate rat­i­fic­a­tion of the New START treaty, ac­cord­ing to the news pub­lic­a­tion.

“Based on your role as Vice Pres­id­ent [Joe] Biden’s lead ne­go­ti­at­or on the New START treaty and as one of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s primary li­ais­ons with the Sen­ate dur­ing the New START rat­i­fic­a­tion pro­cess, we are in­ter­ested in what you knew about po­ten­tial vi­ol­a­tions of the INF treaty and what in­form­a­tion was shared with the Sen­ate,” the two sen­at­ors said.

Wick­er and Ayotte also want an­swers on why it took the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion so many years to up­date Con­gress on its con­cerns about pos­sible treaty trans­gres­sions by Mo­scow.

“If the ad­min­is­tra­tion knew about po­ten­tial vi­ol­a­tions dur­ing con­sid­er­a­tion of the treaty and did not fully in­form the Sen­ate of these vi­ol­a­tions while it de­bated New START, this would rep­res­ent a ser­i­ous ab­rog­a­tion of the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s re­spons­ib­il­it­ies,” states the let­ter, which was viewed by the Daily Beast.

A Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee aide told the news web­site that McK­eon’s pos­sible know­ledge of pur­por­ted Rus­si­an treaty vi­ol­a­tions could sty­mie his con­firm­a­tion.

“It is not yet clear wheth­er the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s fail­ure to in­form the Sen­ate dur­ing [New START] treaty con­sid­er­a­tion was be­cause of neg­li­gence or a de­lib­er­ate act of bad faith,” the com­mit­tee staffer said.

Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Coun­cil spokes­wo­man Caitlyn Hay­den op­ted not to re­spond to re­quests for com­ment on the GOP let­ter.

What We're Following See More »
IN ADDITION TO DNC AND DCCC
Clinton Campaign Also Hacked
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×