A senior U.N. official this week suggested that Syria’s government is not entirely to blame for delays in an operation to destroy its chemical weapons.
The Middle Eastern nation’s security situation “impacts nearly every dimension” of an operation to remove and eliminate hundreds of tons of warfare chemicals from its violence-plagued territory, according to Angela Kane, U.N. high representative for disarmament affairs.
She spoke shortly before international authorities on Friday reportedly proposed giving President Bashar Assad’s regime until the end of next month to finish shipping out the stocks, a process it was earlier scheduled to complete more than two weeks ago. That proposal and an alternative timeline from Damascus appeared to leave the disarmament mission’s overseers with little hope of meeting their goal of fully destroying the Syrian chemical arsenal by the end of June.
Kane, though, noted that Damascus “completed initial actions before the established deadlines” for the operation, such as eliminating its chemical-arms preparation gear and offering data on its chemical-weapons inventory.
Still, the U.N. official stressed that the Syrian government ultimately remains “exclusively” responsible for making sure its chemical weapons are completely destroyed. Assad’s government admitted holding the stockpile and pledged to give it up last year, after a large-scale nerve gas release killed hundreds of people in a Damascus suburb controlled by its opponents.
The United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons have done “everything possible to facilitate the elimination of Syria’s chemical weapons,” she asserted in remarks prepared for delivery in New York earlier this week.
Kane provided little detail on specific security challenges faced by disarmament personnel. However, she said the obstacles partially mirror dangers faced by international investigators who last year confirmed at least five chemical strikes in the country.
Reaching one location could require those inspectors to negotiate with “up to 40 different groups, moving from checkpoint to checkpoint,” she said.
The U.N. official added that Assad’s government “does not control [significant parts] of its territory, including locations where chemical weapons were allegedly used or where chemical weapons facilities are located.”
Damascus has denied using its chemical arms in combat, and has placed blame for chemical strikes on rebel forces.
- 1 Hillary Clinton Will Win the Nomination, But Then What?
- 2 Would Obama’s Paid Sick Leave Proposal Actually Work? Look to San Francisco.
- 3 Do Republicans Believe in Global Warming? Not if They’re in the Tea Party
- 4 In the Iowa caucuses, look for results that surprise you
- 5 Paul Ryan Would Be the Most Conservative House Speaker in Recent History
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.