A senior U.N. official this week suggested that Syria’s government is not entirely to blame for delays in an operation to destroy its chemical weapons.
The Middle Eastern nation’s security situation “impacts nearly every dimension” of an operation to remove and eliminate hundreds of tons of warfare chemicals from its violence-plagued territory, according to Angela Kane, U.N. high representative for disarmament affairs.
She spoke shortly before international authorities on Friday reportedly proposed giving President Bashar Assad’s regime until the end of next month to finish shipping out the stocks, a process it was earlier scheduled to complete more than two weeks ago. That proposal and an alternative timeline from Damascus appeared to leave the disarmament mission’s overseers with little hope of meeting their goal of fully destroying the Syrian chemical arsenal by the end of June.
Kane, though, noted that Damascus “completed initial actions before the established deadlines” for the operation, such as eliminating its chemical-arms preparation gear and offering data on its chemical-weapons inventory.
Still, the U.N. official stressed that the Syrian government ultimately remains “exclusively” responsible for making sure its chemical weapons are completely destroyed. Assad’s government admitted holding the stockpile and pledged to give it up last year, after a large-scale nerve gas release killed hundreds of people in a Damascus suburb controlled by its opponents.
The United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons have done “everything possible to facilitate the elimination of Syria’s chemical weapons,” she asserted in remarks prepared for delivery in New York earlier this week.
Kane provided little detail on specific security challenges faced by disarmament personnel. However, she said the obstacles partially mirror dangers faced by international investigators who last year confirmed at least five chemical strikes in the country.
Reaching one location could require those inspectors to negotiate with “up to 40 different groups, moving from checkpoint to checkpoint,” she said.
The U.N. official added that Assad’s government “does not control [significant parts] of its territory, including locations where chemical weapons were allegedly used or where chemical weapons facilities are located.”
Damascus has denied using its chemical arms in combat, and has placed blame for chemical strikes on rebel forces.
What We're Following See More »
Two powerful House members—Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA) and Veterans Affairs Committee Chair Jeff Miller (R-FL)—are throwing their support behind Donald Trump.
There are not "ongoing, direct conversations between" the Bernie Sanders camp and the Hillary Clinton camp regarding "the platform or rules changes," but Sanders "is already making his opening arguments" about those issues on the stump. Sanders is putting "complaints about closed primaries" atop his stump speeches lately, and figures to start a "conversation about the role of superdelegates in the nominating process." He said, “Our goal, whether we win or we do not win, is to transform the Democratic Party."
Well, this is unsubtle. Former Speaker John Boehner called Ted Cruz "lucifer in the flesh," adding that he "never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life." Boehner has endorsed John Kasich, but he said he'd vote for Donald Trump over Cruz. He also praised Bernie Sanders, calling him the most honest politician in the race, and predicted that Joe Biden may yet have a role to play in the Democratic contest, especially if Hillary Clinton runs into legal trouble over her emails.