Hagel, Ukrainian Counterpart Reestablish Contact in Wake of Peace Deal

Officials said earlier this week that U.S. phone calls to top security officials weren’t being answered.

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel listens to a speaker before testifying on Syria to the House Armed Services Committee on September 10, 2013.
National Journal
Jordain Carney
Feb. 21, 2014, 1:59 p.m.

Ukrain­i­an De­fense Min­is­ter Pavlo Lebedev prom­ised De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel on Fri­day that the coun­try’s mil­it­ary won’t be used against pro­test­ers — a key con­cern for U.S. of­fi­cials as ten­sions es­cal­ated over the past week.

The phone call came after U.S. State and De­fense de­part­ment of­fi­cials said earli­er this week that they had been un­able to reach seni­or se­cur­ity-force lead­ers, in­clud­ing Lebedev. Rear Adm. John Kirby, the Pentagon press sec­ret­ary, said Thursday that Hagel had been try­ing to con­tact Lebedev dir­ectly.

A seni­or State De­part­ment of­fi­cial said Wed­nes­day that they were “par­tic­u­larly con­cerned “¦ by the chan­ging of the guard” at the mil­it­ary bar­racks.

But Lebedev said the de­ploy­ment of the coun­try’s armed forces “has been fo­cused on pro­tect­ing de­fense fa­cil­it­ies and equip­ment, and that his forces would not use arms against the Ukrain­i­an people,” ac­cord­ing to a readout from Kirby.

The con­ver­sa­tion fol­lows an an­nounce­ment from Ukrain­i­an Pres­id­ent Vikt­or Ya­nukovych that a peace agree­ment has been reached with op­pos­i­tion forces. The peace deal in­cludes a res­tor­a­tion of the 2004 con­sti­tu­tion, which the par­lia­ment has already en­acted; the form­a­tion of a na­tion­al unity gov­ern­ment; and con­sti­tu­tion­al re­forms, in­clud­ing a new con­sti­tu­tion, to be com­pleted by Septem­ber, the State De­part­ment of­fi­cial said.

Though the deal marks a sharp turn from the vi­ol­ence this week that left ap­prox­im­ately 77 people dead, the of­fi­cial ad­ded that it “is a very, very fra­gile agree­ment des­pite the pro­cess.” The two sides had called for a truce on Wed­nes­day, but that was quickly dis­rup­ted by an­oth­er wave of fight­ing.

Pres­id­ent Obama also spoke with Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin on Fri­day. Ac­cord­ing to the of­fi­cial, a bulk of the call was on the Ukraine and was “con­struct­ive,” with both sides agree­ing that the deal needs to be im­ple­men­ted quickly and pledging to stay en­gaged.

White House spokes­man Jay Car­ney praised the deal, say­ing, “We sup­port the ef­forts of all those who ne­go­ti­ated this agree­ment, com­mend the cour­ageous op­pos­i­tion lead­ers who re­cog­nized the need for com­prom­ise, and of­fer the sup­port of the United States in its im­ple­ment­a­tion.”

But Car­ney warned that the United States re­mains “pre­pared to im­pose ad­di­tion­al sanc­tions as ne­ces­sary.”

A bi­par­tis­an group of sen­at­ors called earli­er this week for sanc­tions against Ukra­ni­an of­fi­cials tied to the re­cent crack­down, and For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Bob Cork­er said Fri­day that the United States “should have sanc­tions ready in case there is re­newed vi­ol­ence or Ya­nukovych’s gov­ern­ment fails to pro­ceed in good faith.”

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion on Wed­nes­day blocked ap­prox­im­ately 20 Ukrain­i­an of­fi­cials, who it says are tied to the gov­ern­ment’s re­cent crack­down, from ob­tain­ing a visa to travel to the United States.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×