U.S. Auditor Faults Agency for Nuclear-Project Cost Estimates

Construction of the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration's Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility is seen in this 2010 aerial photograph. Congressional auditors on Thursday faulted the Energy Department agency for not having a good handle on why costs have risen so much for the South Carolina project.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
Feb. 20, 2014, 9:30 a.m.

A U.S. Con­gress watch­dog is fault­ing the En­ergy De­part­ment for not hav­ing a clear idea why costs have ris­en so much on a key non­pro­lif­er­a­tion pro­gram.

The de­part­ment’s semi­autonom­ous Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion fore­casts a roughly $3 bil­lion in­crease in the cost to its ef­forts to dis­pose of sur­plus weapons-grade plutoni­um by trans­form­ing it in­to atom­ic re­act­or fuel known as mixed ox­ide. Con­gress’ Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice in a new re­port re­leased on Thursday said the agency had erred by not ana­lyz­ing the “root causes” be­hind the cost in­crease.

The con­gres­sion­al aud­it­ors noted the nuc­le­ar weapons agency his­tor­ic­ally has “dif­fi­culty in com­plet­ing pro­jects with­in cost and sched­ule,” which has con­trib­uted to a num­ber of these ini­ti­at­ives fa­cing “high risk of fraud, waste, ab­use, and mis­man­age­ment.”

The Mixed Ox­ide Fuel Fab­ric­a­tion Fa­cil­ity un­der con­struc­tion at the Sa­van­nah River Site in South Car­o­lina has seen its pro­jec­ted price tag rise from $4.9 bil­lion to $7.7 bil­lion. Sev­er­al gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials and in­dustry in­siders re­cently told the Cen­ter for Pub­lic In­teg­rity the fi­nal cost of build­ing and op­er­at­ing the plant could reach as high as $30 bil­lion. That pro­jec­ted ex­pense re­portedly has led the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to con­sider look­ing for an­oth­er op­tion for dis­pos­ing of the 34 tons of plutoni­um that the MOX fa­cil­ity was in­ten­ded to handle.

One ma­jor reas­on for the rising pro­ject costs is that the En­ergy De­part­ment in 2007 ap­proved cost and sched­ule es­tim­ates when the over­all designs were only 58 per­cent com­plete, ac­cord­ing to the GAO re­port. Be­cause of this early move, agency of­fi­cials are now re­port­ing that the ex­pense of key com­pon­ents for the plant are on av­er­age 60 per­cent high­er than was earli­er es­tim­ated.

The re­port con­cluded there was not a clear un­der­stand­ing as to why the En­ergy De­part­ment ap­proved the cost es­tim­ates when the design work was far from be­ing com­plete. Hav­ing that know­ledge could help NNSA of­fi­cials in the fu­ture avoid­ing re­peat­ing the mis­takes made with the mixed-ox­ide pro­gram, the aud­it­ors said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
25 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
25 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
25 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
25 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×