The Only Reason the U.S. Cares About Violence in Ukraine

Vladimir Putin.

Berkut riot police hang a Ukrainian flag from a street light on Independence Square on February 19, 2014 in Kiev, Ukraine.
National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros
Feb. 19, 2014, 10:11 a.m.

The deadly protests that have broken out in the streets of Kiev are no longer just a Ukrain­i­an is­sue. They might soon be an Amer­ic­an one, too.

As is the case in sev­er­al con­flicts across the world, Ukraine is just the next proxy battle between the United States and Rus­sia.

To un­der­stand the role the U.S. plays here, it’s first im­port­ant to un­der­stand both sides of the on­go­ing con­flict. For the last three months, pro­test­ers have de­fi­antly stood against a Ukrain­i­an gov­ern­ment that re­fuses to strengthen ties with the European Uni­on. Mean­while, op­pos­i­tion lead­ers have cap­it­al­ized on a grow­ing pro-West sen­ti­ment in the west­ern part of Ukraine that has para­lyzed the coun­try and brought a vi­ol­ent show­down that has gained the at­ten­tion of the world.

Ukrain­i­an Pres­id­ent Vikt­or Ya­nukovych rep­res­ents the mostly Rus­si­an-speak­ing east­ern and south­ern parts of the coun­try, and has been cozy with the Krem­lin on many eco­nom­ic and en­ergy is­sues. Protests began in Novem­ber after Ya­nukovych backed away from a trade deal with the European Uni­on. In­stead, the coun­try got a $15 bil­lion bail­out from Rus­sia. Ukraine, a former So­viet re­pub­lic, his­tor­ic­ally has been pro-Krem­lin.

Now, protests de­mand­ing a new elec­tion seem to be es­cal­at­ing to­ward a civil war that threatens to break the coun­try in two. On Tues­day, clashes between ri­ot po­lice and demon­strat­ors left 25 people dead and hun­dreds more in­jured.

As parts of the cap­it­al city of Kiev re­main in flames as the res­ult of Mo­lotov cock­tails, Deputy Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Ad­viser Ben Rhodes told re­port­ers Wed­nes­day that the U.S. is co­ordin­at­ing with the E.U. on a path for­ward.

“We have made it clear we would con­sider tak­ing ac­tion against in­di­vidu­als who are re­spons­ible for acts of vi­ol­ence with­in Ukraine,” Rhodes said. “We have a tool kit for do­ing that that in­cludes sanc­tions.”

Sanc­tions likely in­volve freez­ing the as­sets of Ukrain­i­an lead­ers, while also re­strict­ing travel. Vice Pres­id­ent Joe Biden is also work­ing the phones. On Tues­day, he called Ya­nukovych to ex­press “grave con­cern” over the crisis and con­demned the vi­ol­ence, one of sev­er­al calls Biden has made re­cently. On Wed­nes­day, Pres­id­ent Obama, speak­ing in Mex­ico to re­port­ers, said, “The United States con­demns in the strongest terms the vi­ol­ence that’s tak­ing place.”

But sanc­tions are not a done deal just yet. While sanc­tions are on the table, the threat might be dropped if the Ukrain­i­an gov­ern­ment backs down — re­leases pris­on­ers, pulls back from protest en­camp­ments, and opens a dia­logue with op­pos­i­tion lead­ers. So far, the of­fi­cial re­ac­tion from the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion comes off as one con­cerned with the demo­crat­ic pro­cess and the hu­man­it­ari­an vi­ol­a­tions. But there’s a deep­er mo­tiv­a­tion afoot.

Leave it to hawk­ish Re­pub­lic­ans in the Sen­ate not to mince words about the situ­ation. A turnover of power in the coun­try — or at the very least the weak­en­ing of Ukrain­i­an lead­er­ship — would deal a ma­jor blow to Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin, some Re­pub­lic­ans say.

Sen. John Mc­Cain, in an in­ter­view with CNN on Tues­day, didn’t skirt the is­sue. “Watch out for Vladi­mir Putin be­cause he will try to make mis­chief be­cause he be­lieves that Ukraine is part of Rus­sia,” the Ari­zona Re­pub­lic­an said.

Sen. Marco Ru­bio in a state­ment went down the same path, say­ing in part, “Ukraine’s fu­ture lies in Europe, not Vladi­mir Putin’s Rus­sia.”

The Rus­si­ans are also fully aware that what hap­pens in Ukraine af­fects their stand­ing in the re­gion too. Putin has been on the phone with Ya­nukovych in the last few days. Rus­si­an For­eign Min­is­ter Sergei Lav­rov also blatantly blamed the West for the vi­ol­ence. “I can­not leave without men­tion­ing the re­spons­ib­il­ity that lies with the West en­cour­aging the op­pos­i­tion to act out­side of the law,” he said Wed­nes­day.

Obama and mem­bers of his ad­min­is­tra­tion won’t men­tion Rus­sia and Putin in the same breath as the Ukrain­i­an con­flict. But it’s clear that Mo­scow is one of the biggest reas­ons why it’s a pri­or­ity for the U.S.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4743) }}

What We're Following See More »
Hill Dems Mull Dropping Wasserman Schultz
5 minutes ago

Concerned that she's become too divisive, "Democrats on Capitol Hill are discussing whether Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should step down as Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman before the party’s national convention in July. ... Wasserman Schultz has had an increasingly acrimonious relationship with the party’s other presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, and his supporters, who argue she has tilted the scales in Clinton’s favor." The money quote, from a Democratic senator who backs Clinton: “There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on." Meanwhile, Newsweek takes a look at why no one seems to like Wasserman Schultz.

House Votes Today on Bill to Strip Budget Autonomy from DC
5 minutes ago

"The U.S. House of Representatives plans to vote Wednesday on a Republican bill that would block the District of Columbia from spending locally raised tax revenue without congressional approval, prompting President Obama to pledge to veto it. In issuing the veto threat on Tuesday, the Obama White House made one of the strongest statements to date in support of the District’s attempt to win financial independence from Congress."

Warren Goes After Trump Yet Again
11 hours ago

When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage. 

Kasich Tells His Delegates to Remain Pledged to Him
16 hours ago

Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."

Sanders Wants a Recount in Kentucky
17 hours ago

Bernie Sanders "signed a letter Tuesday morning requesting a full and complete check and recanvass of the election results in Kentucky ... where he trails Hillary Clinton by less than one-half of 1 percent of the vote. The Sanders campaign said it has asked the Kentucky secretary of state to have election officials review electronic voting machines and absentee ballots from last week's primary in each of the state's 120 counties.