With U.S. involvement in Afghanistan after this year still unclear, the administration is looking for other ways to launch drones into Pakistan, officials said.
Officials told the Los Angeles Times that the administration is looking at other bases in Central Asia, but noted that moving out of Afghanistan will hinder the CIA’s ability to launch timely strikes in Pakistan’s mountainous border region.
“There is an enormous amount of human intelligence collected that supports the strikes, and those bases are a key part of it,” one official said.
The United States has yet to get a bilateral security agreement with Afghanistan, and without it all U.S. forces will pull out of the country by the end of the year. Afghan President Hamid Karzai said the pact could be signed after the country’s elections this spring.
Military planes currently accompany the CIA’s drones in Afghanistan, and officials said if the U.S. bases in Afghanistan close they could move the drones to northern countries, but didn’t specific which.
It’s not the first time officials have acknowledged contingency planning in its ability to launch drone strikes against terrorist organizations in Pakistan.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said earlier this month that he didn’t want to “get into the specifics of what our plans are on intelligence and drone strikes,” noting that “you’re constantly updating and changing … where you posture those assets, where the threats are most significant, where do you have allies that are willing to work with you.”
But the administration has scaled back its use of drones in recent years. Pakistan was the target of 28 drones strikes in 2013, down from a high of 117 in 2010.
What We're Following See More »
Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz "will not have a major speaking role or preside over daily convention proceedings this week," and is under increasing pressure to resign. The DNC Rules Committee on Saturday named Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcia Fudge as "permanent chair of the convention." At issue: internal DNC emails leaked by Wikileaks that show how "the DNC favored Clinton during the primary and tried to take down Bernie Sanders by questioning his religion."
- A Rasmussen Reports poll shows Donald Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton, 43%-42%, the fourth week in a row he's led the poll (one of the few poll in which he's led consistently of late).
- A Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Clinton leading 40%-36%. In a four-way race, she maintains her four-point lead, 39%-35%, with Gary Johnson and Jill Stein pulling 7% and 3%, respectively.
- And the LA Times/USC daily tracking poll shows a dead heat, with Trump ahead by about half a percentage point.
In an election between two candidates around 70 years of age, millennials strongly prefer one over the other. Hillary Clinton has a 47%-30% edge among votes 18 to 29. She also leads 46%-36% among voters aged 30 to 44.
According to an online tracking poll released by New Latino Voice, Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump among Latino voters, attracting support from 81 percent of Latino voters, to just 12 percent support for Trump. The results of this poll are consistent with those from a series of other surveys conducted by various organizations. With Pew Research predicting the 2016 electorate will be 12 percent Hispanic, which would be the highest ever, Trump could be in serious trouble if he can't close the gap.