Republicans Look to Help Obama Clean House at Veterans Affairs

Legislation introduced Tuesday would make firing a senior civil-service employee at the VA nearly as easy as firing a congressional staffer.

National Journal
Jordain Carney
Feb. 12, 2014, 7:04 a.m.

The Vet­er­ans Af­fairs sec­ret­ary could dir­ectly fire or de­mote a seni­or ca­reer civil-ser­vice of­fi­cial un­der le­gis­la­tion pro­posed by Rep. Jeff Miller on Tues­day.

Miller, R-Fla., in­tro­duced the VA Man­age­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Act of 2014, aimed at re­du­cing the “con­sid­er­able amounts of red tape” cur­rently needed.

The le­gis­la­tion would make the pro­cess for fir­ing a high-rank­ing civil ser­vant largely the same as fir­ing con­gres­sion­al staffers — who are con­sidered at-will em­ploy­ees — tak­ing away the no­ti­fic­a­tion and ap­peals rights cur­rently offered.

Miller said he pressed for­ward with the le­gis­la­tion be­cause of what he views as a “wide­spread and sys­tem­ic lack of ac­count­ab­il­ity” at the VA, in­clud­ing “pre­vent­able” vet­er­ans deaths at VA fa­cil­it­ies and a “well-doc­u­mented re­luct­ance to en­sure its lead­ers are held ac­count­able.” Miller said his bill would give VA Sec­ret­ary Eric Shin­seki the au­thor­ity needed to fix what Miller views as a long-stand­ing lead­er­ship is­sue in the de­part­ment.

A re­cent re­port found that 82 vet­er­ans have died, are dy­ing, or have been ser­i­ously in­jured be­cause of delay in treat­ment or dia­gnos­is con­nec­ted with colono­scop­ies and en­do­scop­ies. But it’s un­clear if any­one in­volved at the VA was rep­rim­anded, de­moted, or fired for the delays.

And it’s not the first time Miller has pressed the De­part­ment of Vet­er­ans Af­fairs and the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion. Miller has cri­ti­cized the VA for giv­ing bo­nuses without a clear tie to per­form­ance. And a pro­vi­sion in Miller’s vet­er­ans’ tu­ition le­gis­la­tion that passed the House earli­er this month would ban bo­nuses for high-rank­ing VA civil ser­vants through fisc­al year 2018.

There is one stip­u­la­tion though: With­in 30 days of re­mov­ing an of­fi­cial the sec­ret­ary would have to no­ti­fy mem­bers of the Vet­er­ans Af­fairs com­mit­tees of the re­mov­al and the reas­on­ing be­hind it.

“This le­gis­la­tion would give VA lead­ers a tool to ad­dress a prob­lem that con­tin­ues to get worse by the day. VA’s wide­spread and sys­tem­ic lack of ac­count­ab­il­ity is ex­acer­bat­ing all of its most press­ing prob­lems, in­clud­ing the de­part­ment’s stub­born dis­ab­il­ity-be­ne­fits back­log and a mount­ing toll of at least 31 re­cent pre­vent­able vet­er­an deaths at VA med­ic­al cen­ters across the coun­try,” Miller said in a state­ment.

Sen. Marco Ru­bio in­tro­duced sim­il­ar le­gis­la­tion in the Sen­ate on Tues­day.

The vet­er­ans le­gis­la­tion isn’t a com­plete sur­prise. Miller said last month be­fore Pres­id­ent Obama’s State of the Uni­on ad­dress that if “Obama and VA lead­ers re­fuse to in­still a cul­ture of ac­count­ab­il­ity and trans­par­ency at VA, Con­gress will be forced to take le­gis­lat­ive ac­tion.”

MOST READ
What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×