U.S. forces need to stay in Afghanistan after the end of the year to defend the coalition’s recent progress, a top Defense Department official said Tuesday evening.
“Afghanistan has moved forward quite a bit.”¦ The Afghanistan security forces are in charge. They are providing security for the nation,” Gen. Raymond Odierno, the Army chief of staff, said Tuesday evening at a Council on Foreign Relations event. “What they are not ready to do — their institutions are not yet mature enough to sustain this over the long time.”
Odierno recently returned from Afghanistan, but he said he didn’t meet with Afghan President Hamid Karzai while he was there. U.S. and NATO officials have led a public campaign to get the Afghan president to sign a bilateral security agreement for U.S. military involvement in the country after 2014.
Defense Department officials are recommending that the United States leave 10,000 troops in Afghanistan after this year — approximately the number the United States offered to leave in Iraq.
But Odierno echoed comments made at a congressional hearing Tuesday morning, saying that the two countries face different challenges. Iraq, he said, had a better economy but was at a greater threat for sectarian violence.
“The bigger threat to [Afghanistan] is that the Taliban would come back and try to take the government back,” he said.
Odierno’s comments come as a bipartisan group of senators introduced legislation last week pressing for Congress to be able to vote on whether the United States should keep troops in Afghanistan after 2014.
The Army official also touched on the U.S. shift to the Asia-Pacific, reiterating that despite criticism from members of Congress and other governments, the military is serious about the rebalance.
“I think that they’re watching very carefully, and they’re watching to see what we do,” he said.
What We're Following See More »
Newt Gringrich is actively positioning himself as a possible VP nominee for Donald Trump, according to National Review. After a New York Times piece mentioned him as a possible running mate, he said, "It is an honor to be mentioned. We need a new Contract with America to outline a 100-day plan to take back Washington from the lobbyists, bureaucrats, unions, and leftists. After helping in 1980 with Reagan and 1995 as speaker I know we have to move boldly and decisively before the election results wear off and the establishment starts fighting us. That is my focus." Meanwhile, Trump told CNN he'd be "interested in vetting" John Kasich as well.
"House Democrats are stepping up pressure on Republicans to advance legislation addressing Puerto Rico’s worsening debt crisis by issuing a report arguing that austerity cuts can’t be sustained and have made the island more vulnerable to the mosquito-borne Zika virus." Democrats on the House Natural Resources Committee released a report yesterday that argued "further sharp reductions in government spending can’t be a part of a legislative solution"—especially with a rainy season boosting the mosquito population and stressing an island health system already struggling to deal with the Zika virus.
"ISIS has the capability to stage a Paris-style attack in the U.S. using local cells to strike in multiple locations and inflict dozens of casualties, according to the Obama administration's top U.S. intelligence official." Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told CNN's Peter Bergen that such a scenario is "something we worry about a lot in the United States, that they could conjure up a raid like they did in Paris or Brussels."
"Donald J. Trump said on Wednesday that he expected to reveal his vice presidential pick sometime in July—before the Republican National Convention in Cleveland—but added that he would soon announce a committee to handle the selection process, which would include Dr. Ben Carson." He said he's inclined to name a traditional political figure, unlike himself.
"Groups have flocked to the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs to ask for last-minute changes" to the Department of Labor's new overtime rules, which would require that businesses pay overtime to any salaried employee making more than $50,440 per year, up from the current $23,660. Business interests, as well as some nonprofits, say the move could lead to mass change in workers' statuses, from salaried to hourly. "The White House office held 22 meetings on the proposal in April, according to its calendar, and groups say more meetings are planned this week." Last month, National Journal's Alex Brown reported on how the change might affect Washington.