Why Is Turkey Harboring Terrorists?

Turkey’s connections to Hamas and al-Qaida have been a strain on U.S.-Turkish relations.

Turkish protesters confront police forces during riots in a restaurant district of Ankara June 5, 2013.
National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros
Feb. 6, 2014, midnight

Tur­key is ar­gu­ably Amer­ica’s most im­port­ant ally on is­sues in the Middle East — it’s a strong NATO mem­ber, it rep­res­ents the in­terests of the United States in sev­er­al area con­flicts, and it’s a ma­jor part­ner in glob­al coun­terter­ror­ism ef­forts. But for a coun­try that so pub­licly at­tacks vi­ol­ent ex­trem­ism, it has also in sev­er­al in­stances har­bored and as­sisted ter­ror­ists with­in its own bor­ders.

Sus­pec­ted con­nec­tions to lead­ers of the ter­ror­ist or­gan­iz­a­tion Hamas and re­la­tion­ships with fin­an­ci­ers of al-Qaida have put strains on the re­la­tion­ship between the U.S. and Tur­key, and threaten fu­ture co­oper­a­tion on se­cur­ity is­sues.

There are two ma­jor ex­amples of ex­trem­ist act­ors giv­en pro­tec­tion and ac­cess to lead­ers in Tur­key. The first is Saleh al-Arouri, the founder of Hamas’s armed wing in the West Bank, known as the Qas­sam Bri­gades. He lives in Tur­key and has, ac­cord­ing to re­ports, been in­volved in the fin­ance and lo­gist­ics for mil­it­ant op­er­a­tions in the re­gion.

The second is Saudi busi­ness­man Yasin al-Qadi, who ac­cord­ing to the U.S. gov­ern­ment, is an al-Qaida fin­an­ci­er. Turk­ish Prime Min­is­ter Re­cep Tayyip Er­dogan’s pro­tect­ive de­tail es­cor­ted him after he entered the coun­try re­cently without a pass­port or visa. (Er­dogan pre­vi­ously said, “I be­lieve in him as I be­lieve in my­self.”) He also sup­posedly met with Er­dogan’s son in Janu­ary. The Treas­ury De­part­ment has lis­ted him as a “spe­cially des­ig­nated glob­al ter­ror­ist” since 2001.

These con­nec­tions with Tur­key and its lead­ers, in­clud­ing Er­dogan, have some for­eign policy ana­lysts con­cerned.

“It looks like you’ve got a guy that’s off the rails there,” said Jonath­an Schan­zer, the vice pres­id­ent of re­search at the Found­a­tion for De­fense of Demo­cra­cies. “It’s an im­port­ant ally for the United States. They have been man­aging our Syr­ia policy. They were man­aging our Ar­ab Spring policy. We’ve got a prob­lem that’s be­com­ing in­creas­ingly dif­fi­cult to ig­nore.”

What makes this situ­ation worse is that Tur­key co­chairs a glob­al coun­terter­ror­ism ef­fort with the United States to go after ex­trem­ism at its root. To have a coun­try so pub­licly in­ves­ted in coun­terter­ror­ism but also har­bor­ing ex­trem­ist act­ors goes against the core of the ef­fort, es­pe­cially giv­en the part­ner­ship with the U.S.

“We’ve got a prob­lem that’s be­com­ing in­creas­ingly dif­fi­cult to ig­nore.”

This ef­fort, called the Glob­al Coun­terter­ror­ism For­um, was an­nounced by the State De­part­ment in Septem­ber and con­sists of 29 coun­tries and the European Uni­on. The group goes after rad­ic­al­iz­a­tion by pro­mot­ing loc­al or­gan­iz­a­tions and pro­jects that tar­get at-risk people in coun­tries where ex­trem­ism is com­mon. It uses funds raised by both gov­ern­ment and non­gov­ern­ment­al or­gan­iz­a­tions around the world, with a goal of rais­ing more than $200 mil­lion over the next 10 years. Of­fi­cials hope for the ef­fort to be fully op­er­a­tion­al by the middle of this year.

The State De­part­ment did not re­spond to spe­cif­ic Turk­ish ter­ror con­nec­tions, but re­af­firmed its long­stand­ing part­ner­ship with Tur­key, cit­ing its coun­terter­ror­ism as­sist­ance to the Turk­ish na­tion­al po­lice.

Tur­key has un­doubtedly be­come one of the most stra­tegic al­lies of the U.S. in that part of the world in re­cent years, serving as a cush­ion and in­ter­me­di­ary with the volat­ile Middle East. The coun­try can be seen, though, as play­ing two sides. It has, in­deed, been a mod­el for com­bat­ing rad­ic­al­ism in the re­gion and an ex­ample of how mod­ern Is­lam, cap­it­al­ism, and demo­cracy can work to­geth­er. And Tur­key has em­braced these roles.

Pres­id­ent Obama praised the part­ner­ship between the U.S. and Tur­key in May when the Turk­ish prime min­is­ter vis­ited the White House. The two men have spoken fre­quently about the un­stable situ­ations in Egypt, Syr­ia, and oth­er na­tions. In the af­ter­math of the Sept. 11, 2001, at­tacks, Tur­key and the U.S. co­oper­ated ef­fect­ively against ter­ror­ism.

But the re­la­tion­ships with people con­nec­ted to Hamas and al-Qaida is such a prob­lem, ar­gues Schan­zer, that it might even qual­i­fy Tur­key as a state spon­sor of ter­ror­ism. Now, there are only four coun­tries cur­rently on that list: Cuba, Ir­an, Su­dan, and Syr­ia. All four na­tions provide sup­port for acts of ter­ror­ism, both do­mest­ic­ally and in­ter­na­tion­ally. For ex­ample, Ir­an has pre­vi­ously sent people to Ar­gen­tina to blow up syn­agogues in Jew­ish com­munity cen­ters, among oth­er in­stances.

Such a des­ig­na­tion from the U.S. gov­ern­ment would be quite drastic and is highly un­likely to hap­pen, con­sid­er­ing that it threatens an al­li­ance that has, ac­cord­ing to U.S. of­fi­cials, helped many Amer­ic­an ef­forts in the re­gion. Tur­key is crit­ic­al in over­throw­ing the As­sad re­gime in Syr­ia and con­tain­ing Ir­an. A ter­ror des­ig­na­tion, which hasn’t been giv­en since 1993, would mean sanc­tions and polit­ic­al isol­a­tion.

However, that is not say­ing Amer­ic­an of­fi­cials have not dir­ectly gone to Turk­ish of­fi­cials and ex­pressed their con­cern in this area. They have done so to “the highest levels,” ac­cord­ing to former U.S. Am­bas­sad­or to Tur­key James Jef­frey, who served from 2008 to 2010.

Dur­ing his ten­ure, the U.S. asked Tur­key on sev­er­al in­stances to de­tain people as­so­ci­ated with al-Qaida who were trav­el­ing through Tur­key. And on many of those oc­ca­sions, the Turks did not act di­li­gently enough and failed to de­liv­er.

“This does cause prob­lems with the United States,” said Jef­frey, who is cur­rently serving as a dis­tin­guished vis­it­ing fel­low at the Wash­ing­ton In­sti­tute for Near East Policy. “We deal with this all the time all over the Middle East”¦. You just keep on go­ing back and ask­ing them.”

These in­cid­ents have either been de­lib­er­ate on the part of the Turk­ish gov­ern­ment, giv­ing ex­trem­ist act­ors a pass, or have of­ten been just be­cause of the por­ous leg­al sys­tem in the coun­try. When ter­ror­ists slip through, the U.S. will con­tact Tur­key, and ex­press its dis­ap­point­ment to the chag­rin of the Turks.

Pre­vi­ously, the Treas­ury De­part­ment has also called out Tur­key for let­ting al-Qaida fund­ing travel through the coun­try in­to Syr­ia, which sup­ports mil­it­ants fight­ing against the As­sad re­gime. But Tur­key has also gone after al-Qaida in its coun­try. Just in Janu­ary, Turk­ish law en­force­ment raided the of­fices of a hu­man­it­ari­an NGO, claim­ing they had ties to al-Qaida and were fun­nel­ing weapons in­to Syr­ia.

“Gen­er­ally, Tur­key will close a blind eye to groups that use ter­ror if Tur­key sees their polit­ic­al goals as com­mend­able.”

Hamas has also been a del­ic­ate sub­ject between the two coun­tries. Dur­ing the Rose Garden press con­fer­ence, Er­dogan de­fi­antly main­tained that he would travel to the Ga­za Strip and the West Bank, des­pite ob­jec­tions from the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion. At the time of Er­dogan’s vis­it to the U.S., the State De­part­ment re­peated its claim that Hamas is a “for­eign ter­ror­ist or­gan­iz­a­tion.”

Tur­key, though, sup­ports Hamas polit­ic­ally as a le­git­im­ate, demo­crat­ic­ally elec­ted or­gan­iz­a­tion, which in their eyes will help lib­er­ate Palestine. Tur­key does re­cog­nize Is­rael and main­tains dip­lo­mat­ic re­la­tions, des­pite ma­jor policy ten­sions. They’d point out that Hamas lead­ers travel to coun­tries around the world. Tur­key just so hap­pens to be one of them.

So, while the U.S., like Is­rael, might view Hamas as a ter­ror­ist group, “Gen­er­ally, Tur­key will close a blind eye to groups that use ter­ror if Tur­key sees their polit­ic­al goals as com­mend­able,” Jef­frey said.

But it is not like Tur­key doesn’t deal with ter­ror­ism in­side its own bor­ders. To the con­trary, just be­fore Er­dogan’s vis­it to Wash­ing­ton, two car bombs killed dozens of people in his coun­try. And for dec­ades un­til last year, PKK mil­it­ants car­ried out at­tacks against Turks on be­half of minor­ity Kur­ds in the coun­try.

However, for a part­ner­ship as crit­ic­al as the one between the U.S. and Tur­key, the trouble­some Hamas and al-Qaida con­nec­tions con­tin­ue to serve as a point of ten­sion. Ter­ror­ism is a part of the mo­sa­ic of the Middle East, and some­times it’s used as a polit­ic­al tool by some coun­tries. In this in­stance, that coun­try is Tur­key.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×