The Navy is investigating alleged cheating among staff members at its nuclear training school in Charleston, S.C., officials said Tuesday.
The alleged cheating was on a written proficiency exam at one of the Navy’s nuclear-training commands, said Adm. Jonathan Greenert, chief of naval operations. The written exam is one several tests a staff member must take to qualify, including passing an oral academic board and a practical exam.
“To say that I’m disappointed would be an understatement,” Greenert said, adding that the other elements required to qualify “appear to be valid” based on current information.
All personnel implicated in the cheating have been temporarily removed, said Adm. John Richardson, the director of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program, adding that all personnel are being retested.
Officials were alerted Monday of the alleged cheating. In addition to the investigation that is underway, Richardson said that a five-person team “will review past assessments to make sure we did not have a broader problem with this command.”
It’s unclear how many are currently implicated in the alleged cheating, and officials were hesitant to pin down a number. Richardson estimated that in total it involved less than 1 percent of the 16,000 involved in the Navy’s nuclear program.
He added that “less than 20” is a “ballpark figure,” but officials later categorized the number of those potentially involved could be between 16 and 160.
Staff members went through the qualification as students, and officials estimated that it was likely their third time to qualify.
“We see no evidence of compromises toward the students, at this point,” Richardson said.
The Navy is the second branch of the military to have issues with cheating in recent months. Ninety-two members of an Air Force nuclear-missile crew at a base in Montana are being tied to a growing cheating scandal, Air Force officials said last week.
What We're Following See More »
Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.
Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."
Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."
Hillary Clinton may have the Democratic nomination sewn up, but Bernie Sanders apparently isn't buying it. Buoyed by a poll showing them in a "virtual tie," Sanders is "holding three rallies on the final day before the state primary and hoping to pull off a win after a tough week of election losses and campaign layoffs."
As unbound delegates pledged to Ted Cruz watch him "struggle to tread water in a primary increasingly dominated by Trump, many of them, wary of a bitter convention battle that could rend the party at its seams, are rethinking their commitment to the Texas senator."