E.U. Iran-Talks Lead: Any Breakthrough Could Push Talks Past Six Months

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Feb. 3, 2014, 8:42 a.m.

A key European Uni­on dip­lo­mat­ic co­ordin­at­or sug­ges­ted that en­voys might need more than half a year to reach a fi­nal nuc­le­ar deal with Ir­an.

The fig­ure, E.U. for­eign policy chief Cath­er­ine Ashton, dis­cussed the pos­sib­il­ity of a drawn-out dip­lo­mat­ic pro­cess in an in­ter­view on Sunday, the Wall Street Journ­al re­ports.

Her re­marks came as some Ir­a­ni­an and West­ern gov­ern­ment in­siders ex­pressed hope that ne­go­ti­at­ors would re­solve years-old con­cerns over Ir­an’s atom­ic activ­it­ies with­in the six-month dur­a­tion of an in­ter­im ac­cord that took ef­fect on Jan. 20. Ex­perts have said com­plic­a­tions could arise from ex­tend­ing the ini­tial pact, in which Tehran agreed to re­strict some of its nuc­le­ar activ­it­ies in re­turn for sanc­tions re­lief pledged by the five per­man­ent U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil mem­ber na­tions and Ger­many.

“Every­one will say to you, and rightly so, this is ex­tremely dif­fi­cult,” said Ashton, who has com­mu­nic­ated with Tehran on be­half of the “P-5+1” na­tions. “We have no guar­an­tees in this and we will take the time that is ne­ces­sary to get this to be the right agree­ment.”

Mul­ti­lat­er­al dis­cus­sions on a com­pre­hens­ive ar­range­ment are sched­uled to start on Feb. 18 in Vi­enna, Re­u­ters quoted her as say­ing on Fri­day. Wash­ing­ton and its al­lies want a fi­nal plan to clear up in­ter­na­tion­al sus­pi­cions that Ir­an is pur­su­ing a nuc­le­ar-weapons cap­ab­il­ity un­der the guise of a peace­ful atom­ic pro­gram.

A num­ber of West­ern gov­ern­ment sources an­onym­ously voiced skep­ti­cism that the sides could fi­nal­ize such a deal by the middle of 2014, the Journ­al re­por­ted. Ac­cord­ing to some en­voys, pre­par­ing a pre­lim­in­ary text as a found­a­tion for the talks could be a months-long pro­cess in it­self.

Ir­an’s top dip­lo­mat is­sued dif­fer­ing as­sess­ments of the pos­sible dur­a­tion of the dis­cus­sions.

Speak­ing on Monday to the Ger­man Coun­cil on For­eign Re­la­tions, Ir­a­ni­an For­eign Min­is­ter Mo­hammad Javad Za­rif said that “with good will we can reach an agree­ment with­in six [months],” Re­u­ters re­por­ted.

On Sunday, though, Za­rif said “it would be fool­ish for us to only bar­gain for six months,” ac­cord­ing to the news agency.

The Ir­a­ni­an for­eign min­is­ter said he held one-on-one meet­ings with U.S. Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry and oth­er top of­fi­cials from the six ne­go­ti­at­ing powers at the Mu­nich Se­cur­ity Con­fer­ence this past week­end.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×