British Nuclear-Arms Revamp Seen Losing Labor Party Support

Global Security Newswire Staff
Feb. 3, 2014, 9:49 a.m.

Plans to re­place the Brit­ish sub­mar­ine-based nuc­le­ar de­terrent could be los­ing fa­vor among rank-and-file Labor Party law­makers, the Guard­i­an re­ports.

Brit­ish De­fense Sec­ret­ary Philip Ham­mond re­portedly called on de­fense min­is­ters to seek in­creased uni­on pres­sure on Labor le­gis­lat­ors to sup­port the po­ten­tial re­place­ment of all four Van­guard-class sub­mar­ines that carry Tri­dent bal­list­ic mis­siles, the news­pa­per re­por­ted on Sunday. The “like-for-like” mod­ern­iz­a­tion plan has faced res­ist­ance from the Lib­er­al Demo­crats, which led an ex­plor­a­tion of al­tern­at­ives as the ju­ni­or mem­ber in a co­ali­tion gov­ern­ment headed by Ham­mond’s Con­ser­vat­ive Party.

“The [Con­ser­vat­ives] don’t want Labor hav­ing a wobble on this,” one gov­ern­ment in­sider told the Guard­i­an.

A Labor spokes­man said the party re­mains an ad­voc­ate of full Tri­dent mod­ern­iz­a­tion.

Ham­mond, though, pressed for ship-con­struc­tion uni­ons to in­form Labor politi­cians of their back­ing for the re­new­al plan after he re­ceived in­dic­a­tions that cer­tain party mem­bers were seek­ing a more im­par­tial po­s­i­tion.

The de­fense sec­ret­ary re­com­men­ded seek­ing a strong stance in fa­vor of full re­place­ment from Keep our Fu­ture Afloat, a group tied to a key Labor Party fin­an­cial sup­port­er. A fi­nal de­cision on mov­ing for­ward with mod­ern­iz­a­tion is ex­pec­ted after the 2015 gen­er­al elec­tion.

A Con­ser­vat­ive in­sider said: “We are con­fid­ent that Labor is com­mit­ted to re­pla­cing the de­terrent … un­like the Lib­er­al Demo­crats who want some part-time de­terrent with dummy mis­siles, provid­ing Bri­tain with no se­cur­ity.”

One-time Labor Party De­fense Sec­ret­ary Des Browne, though, said the mod­ern­iz­a­tion plan faces grow­ing doubts from “from all parties and in both houses” of Par­lia­ment.

“In an age of aus­ter­ity where pub­lic spend­ing is re­du­cing, they are much more skep­tic­al,” Browne said. “If any­thing, I am sur­prised that it has taken min­is­ters un­til now to wake up to this change. Few­er politi­cians ac­cept the ar­gu­ments for con­tinu­ous at-sea de­terrence without ques­tion than ever did be­fore.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×