British Nuclear-Arms Revamp Seen Losing Labor Party Support

Global Security Newswire Staff
Feb. 3, 2014, 9:49 a.m.

Plans to re­place the Brit­ish sub­mar­ine-based nuc­le­ar de­terrent could be los­ing fa­vor among rank-and-file Labor Party law­makers, the Guard­i­an re­ports.

Brit­ish De­fense Sec­ret­ary Philip Ham­mond re­portedly called on de­fense min­is­ters to seek in­creased uni­on pres­sure on Labor le­gis­lat­ors to sup­port the po­ten­tial re­place­ment of all four Van­guard-class sub­mar­ines that carry Tri­dent bal­list­ic mis­siles, the news­pa­per re­por­ted on Sunday. The “like-for-like” mod­ern­iz­a­tion plan has faced res­ist­ance from the Lib­er­al Demo­crats, which led an ex­plor­a­tion of al­tern­at­ives as the ju­ni­or mem­ber in a co­ali­tion gov­ern­ment headed by Ham­mond’s Con­ser­vat­ive Party.

“The [Con­ser­vat­ives] don’t want Labor hav­ing a wobble on this,” one gov­ern­ment in­sider told the Guard­i­an.

A Labor spokes­man said the party re­mains an ad­voc­ate of full Tri­dent mod­ern­iz­a­tion.

Ham­mond, though, pressed for ship-con­struc­tion uni­ons to in­form Labor politi­cians of their back­ing for the re­new­al plan after he re­ceived in­dic­a­tions that cer­tain party mem­bers were seek­ing a more im­par­tial po­s­i­tion.

The de­fense sec­ret­ary re­com­men­ded seek­ing a strong stance in fa­vor of full re­place­ment from Keep our Fu­ture Afloat, a group tied to a key Labor Party fin­an­cial sup­port­er. A fi­nal de­cision on mov­ing for­ward with mod­ern­iz­a­tion is ex­pec­ted after the 2015 gen­er­al elec­tion.

A Con­ser­vat­ive in­sider said: “We are con­fid­ent that Labor is com­mit­ted to re­pla­cing the de­terrent … un­like the Lib­er­al Demo­crats who want some part-time de­terrent with dummy mis­siles, provid­ing Bri­tain with no se­cur­ity.”

One-time Labor Party De­fense Sec­ret­ary Des Browne, though, said the mod­ern­iz­a­tion plan faces grow­ing doubts from “from all parties and in both houses” of Par­lia­ment.

“In an age of aus­ter­ity where pub­lic spend­ing is re­du­cing, they are much more skep­tic­al,” Browne said. “If any­thing, I am sur­prised that it has taken min­is­ters un­til now to wake up to this change. Few­er politi­cians ac­cept the ar­gu­ments for con­tinu­ous at-sea de­terrence without ques­tion than ever did be­fore.”

What We're Following See More »
‘NO BASIS IN LAW’
Eleven States Sue Administration Over Transgender Bathroom Access
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

The great restroom war of 2016 continues apace, as eleven states have sued the Obama administration in federal court, claiming its federal guidance on how schools should accommodate transgender students "has no basis in law." "The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on behalf of Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The lawsuit argues that the federal government has worked to turn workplaces and schools 'into laboratories for a massive social experiment.'"

Source:
NEXT STOP: THE FLOOR
Puerto Rico Debt Bill Passes House Committee
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

By a 29-10 vote, the House Natural Resources Committee today passed the bill to allow Puerto Rico to restructure its $70 billion in debt. The legislation "would establish an oversight board to help the commonwealth restructure its un-payable debt and craft an economic recovery plan."

Source:
WITHIN 15 DAYS OF NOMINATION
Wyden Bill Would Make Nominees’ Tax Disclosures Mandatory
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Though every major party nominee since 1976 has released his tax returns while running for president, the practice has never been required by law. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) wants to change that. The senior Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, which handles tax issues, introduced a bill on Wednesday that would force presidential candidates to release their most recent tax returns. The Presidential Tax Transparency Act, as the bill is called, would require candidates to make their latest three years of tax returns public no later than 15 days after becoming the nominee."

Source:
CONTRARY TO REPORTS
Ryan Not Endorsing Trump Just Yet
4 hours ago
THE LATEST
SHORT ON LACTATION STATIONS, CHANGING TABLES
U.S. Capitol Doesn’t Meet Standards for New Moms
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The U.S. Capitol does not meet the federal government’s own standards for accommodations for new mothers," according to an investigation by NBC Channel 4. "Though the U.S. General Services Administration, a government agency which oversees the management of federal government buildings, requires a minimum number of lactation stations and changing tables, Congress is exempt from the rules and fails to meet those standards." The Capitol grounds have 12 lactations stations, far short of the 42 that would be required given the number of female workers there.

Source:
×