Senator Threatens to Sue Nuclear Agency Over Withheld Documents

Barbara Boxer (D-CA) chairs a meeting of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on January 14, 2009.
National Journal
Douglas P. Guarino
Jan. 30, 2014, 10:03 a.m.

Sen­at­or Bar­bara Box­er (D-Cal­if.) is threat­en­ing to sue the U.S. Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion for with­hold­ing in­form­a­tion re­lated to a now-de­funct nuc­le­ar power plant that law­makers and watch­dog groups feared was a se­cur­ity risk.

South­ern Cali­for­nia Edis­on de­cided last year to per­man­ently close the San Ono­fre nuc­le­ar power plant in Box­er’s home state after the sen­at­or raised con­cerns about dam­aged steam gen­er­at­ors that act­iv­ists said made the site vul­ner­able to sab­ot­age. The law­maker has de­man­ded to get to the bot­tom of how de­fect­ive tech­no­lo­gies were per­mit­ted to be fielded from the out­set.

NRC Chair­wo­man Al­lis­on Mac­far­lane in Novem­ber denied Box­er’s claims that the agency was with­hold­ing in­form­a­tion from the law­maker. But Box­er pushed back dur­ing a Thursday hear­ing, say­ing the com­mis­sion had yet to provide all the doc­u­ments she re­ques­ted.

“Maybe we have to go to court, maybe we have to sue you,” Box­er told Mac­far­lane and the four oth­er pres­id­en­tially ap­poin­ted com­mis­sion­ers. “I will get this in­form­a­tion even if I have to go to whis­tleblowers.”

Box­er chas­tised the com­mis­sion­ers, say­ing NRC of­fi­cials had said “very sweetly” that they would provide all the in­form­a­tion she re­ques­ted, and then later presen­ted a “phony leg­al ar­gu­ment” claim­ing they were not re­quired to do so.

The con­cern re­gard­ing the plant in­volved re­place­ment steam gen­er­at­ors — a key part of re­act­ors’ cool­ing sys­tems — that had been in­stalled at the San Ono­fre plant. A tube in one San Ono­fre re­act­or’s re­place­ment steam gen­er­at­or had burst, while an­oth­er was found to have hun­dreds of dam­aged tubes.

Act­iv­ists ar­gued that these flaws would make it easi­er for a ter­ror­ist to sab­ot­age the plant and cause a melt­down, par­tic­u­larly if an at­tack res­ul­ted in break­ing the re­act­or’s main steam line.

Box­er, who chairs the Sen­ate En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Com­mit­tee, said “we do not yet have all the an­swers to how that dis­astrous situ­ation [at the San Ono­fre plant] oc­curred.” She said it was un­clear why NRC of­fi­cials per­mit­ted the flawed equip­ment to be in­stalled in the first place and that the in­form­a­tion she was seek­ing “will provide les­sons-learned for the com­mis­sion’s fu­ture safety de­cision-mak­ing activ­it­ies.”

Ac­cord­ing to the sen­at­or, the com­mis­sion in­tro­duced a new policy lim­it­ing the dis­tri­bu­tion of non-pub­lic in­form­a­tion to mem­bers of Con­gress last year, prompt­ing law­makers to over­turn the policy as part of ap­pro­pri­ations le­gis­la­tion ap­proved this month.

Box­er slammed the fed­er­al com­mis­sion for not act­ing in a trans­par­ent man­ner gen­er­ally, and com­plained that the agency also was not re­leas­ing in­form­a­tion per­tain­ing to how it jus­ti­fies its travel budget. She ex­pressed sup­port for NRC of­fi­cials vis­it­ing cer­tain des­tin­a­tions — such as Ja­pan, the site of the 2011 Fukushi­ma dis­aster.

However, oth­er des­tin­a­tions to which NRC of­fi­cials had traveled “look fun to go to,” but it is un­clear why they were ne­ces­sary, she said.

Box­er said she would con­tin­ue to press the is­sue at an­oth­er hear­ing “real soon.” In the next ses­sion, she prom­ised also to grill the com­mis­sion­ers re­gard­ing their de­cision to con­duct cost-be­ne­fit ana­lyses of vari­ous ac­tions NRC staff had re­com­men­ded that the U.S. in­dustry be re­quired to take to en­sure their fa­cil­it­ies don’t ex­per­i­ence a Fukushi­ma-type dis­aster.

The Cali­for­nia sen­at­or ar­gued the ana­lyses were un­ne­ces­sary, and that the wide scope of the dev­ast­a­tion the Fukushi­ma in­cid­ent caused in Ja­pan had provided enough jus­ti­fic­a­tion for the pre­vent­at­ive meas­ures to be taken at U.S. fa­cil­it­ies. She said the NRC stud­ies had caused the agency to fall be­hind sched­ule in terms of im­ple­ment­ing the re­com­mend­a­tions.

In some cases, the com­mis­sion has op­ted not to make cer­tain re­quire­ments of the power in­dustry on the grounds that the prob­ab­il­ity of events oc­cur­ing that would re­quire such pro­tec­tions was low.

However, Box­er said it would be im­prop­er for the agency to de­cide against im­ple­ment­ing the re­com­mend­a­tions on such a basis. She said the 2001 at­tacks on New York and Wash­ing­ton, along with re­cent cata­stroph­ic weath­er events, had shown that the un­ex­pec­ted can oc­cur.

“You can all say it will nev­er hap­pen here but “¦ we are just not that power­ful,” Box­er said. “We’re humble.”

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
8 hours ago
THE LATEST
×