Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) is threatening to sue the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for withholding information related to a now-defunct nuclear power plant that lawmakers and watchdog groups feared was a security risk.
Southern California Edison decided last year to permanently close the San Onofre nuclear power plant in Boxer’s home state after the senator raised concerns about damaged steam generators that activists said made the site vulnerable to sabotage. The lawmaker has demanded to get to the bottom of how defective technologies were permitted to be fielded from the outset.
NRC Chairwoman Allison Macfarlane in November denied Boxer’s claims that the agency was withholding information from the lawmaker. But Boxer pushed back during a Thursday hearing, saying the commission had yet to provide all the documents she requested.
“Maybe we have to go to court, maybe we have to sue you,” Boxer told Macfarlane and the four other presidentially appointed commissioners. “I will get this information even if I have to go to whistleblowers.”
Boxer chastised the commissioners, saying NRC officials had said “very sweetly” that they would provide all the information she requested, and then later presented a “phony legal argument” claiming they were not required to do so.
The concern regarding the plant involved replacement steam generators — a key part of reactors’ cooling systems — that had been installed at the San Onofre plant. A tube in one San Onofre reactor’s replacement steam generator had burst, while another was found to have hundreds of damaged tubes.
Activists argued that these flaws would make it easier for a terrorist to sabotage the plant and cause a meltdown, particularly if an attack resulted in breaking the reactor’s main steam line.
Boxer, who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said “we do not yet have all the answers to how that disastrous situation [at the San Onofre plant] occurred.” She said it was unclear why NRC officials permitted the flawed equipment to be installed in the first place and that the information she was seeking “will provide lessons-learned for the commission’s future safety decision-making activities.”
According to the senator, the commission introduced a new policy limiting the distribution of non-public information to members of Congress last year, prompting lawmakers to overturn the policy as part of appropriations legislation approved this month.
Boxer slammed the federal commission for not acting in a transparent manner generally, and complained that the agency also was not releasing information pertaining to how it justifies its travel budget. She expressed support for NRC officials visiting certain destinations — such as Japan, the site of the 2011 Fukushima disaster.
However, other destinations to which NRC officials had traveled “look fun to go to,” but it is unclear why they were necessary, she said.
Boxer said she would continue to press the issue at another hearing “real soon.” In the next session, she promised also to grill the commissioners regarding their decision to conduct cost-benefit analyses of various actions NRC staff had recommended that the U.S. industry be required to take to ensure their facilities don’t experience a Fukushima-type disaster.
The California senator argued the analyses were unnecessary, and that the wide scope of the devastation the Fukushima incident caused in Japan had provided enough justification for the preventative measures to be taken at U.S. facilities. She said the NRC studies had caused the agency to fall behind schedule in terms of implementing the recommendations.
In some cases, the commission has opted not to make certain requirements of the power industry on the grounds that the probability of events occuring that would require such protections was low.
However, Boxer said it would be improper for the agency to decide against implementing the recommendations on such a basis. She said the 2001 attacks on New York and Washington, along with recent catastrophic weather events, had shown that the unexpected can occur.
“You can all say it will never happen here but “¦ we are just not that powerful,” Boxer said. “We’re humble.”
What We're Following See More »
The Federal Open Market Committee today voted to leave interest rates alone, but "upgraded its assessment of the economy’s recent performance and said near-term risks to the outlook have diminished, effectively leaving the door open to raise rates later this year, possibly as early as September."
"Spurred by VP pick Mike Pence, a former congressman with close ties to many lawmakers, the Trump campaign in recent weeks has stepped up its courtship of wary Capitol Hill Republicans. And the efforts appear to be bearing fruit." Central to the charm offensive: invitations to more than a dozen "Senate and House members into his family’s private box for some power-schmoozing with him and his kids" during the Republican National Convention.
Donald Trump essentially encouraged more Russian espionage against Democrats in a press conference this morning. "Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” he said. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.” That prompted Brendan Buck, spokesman for House Speaker Paul Ryan to say: “Russia is a global menace led by a devious thug. Putin should stay out of this election.”
Investigations are never far from the Clintons, and here's another: At the behest of "dozens" of Republican lawmakers, the IRS is opening a fraud investigation into the Clinton Foundation."The move signals a shift from the IRS's announcement last year that it would not look into allegations of financial irregularities at the well-connected charity."
"Bickering commissioners, ineffective managers and lousy internal communication rank among the top reasons why the Federal Election Commission" has some of the worst morale in the federal government. That's the conclusion of an inspector general's report, which put "the most blame on the FEC’s six commissioners: three Democratic appointees and three Republican appointees who have regularly criticized one another and frequently (but not exclusively) deadlocked on high-profile political issues before them."