‘Supporting the Troops’ Without Supporting Any Troops: A How-To Guide

Members of Congress are vowing to reverse recent military pension cuts, but they’re tying the legislation to unrelated proposals with little chance of passing.

In this photo taken Saturday, Aug. 21, 2010, U.S. Army soldiers from 4th Battalion, 9th Infantry Regiment stand in formation during the casing ceremony for 4th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, the last American combat brigade to serve in Iraq, at Camp Virginia, Kuwait. The number of U.S. troops in Iraq has fallen below 50,000 for the first time since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion and ahead of the end-of-the-month deadline mandated by President Barack Obama, the American military said in a statement Tuesday. The number is a watershed _ American forces will no longer conduct combat operations in the country but are instead to train Iraqi troops and help with counter terrorism operations, if asked for by the Iraqis. (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo)
National Journal
Jordain Carney
Jan. 23, 2014, midnight

Ever since sign­ing off on a Decem­ber budget deal that that rolled back $6 bil­lion in vet­er­ans pen­sions, law­makers have pro­fessed great sin­cer­ity in their ef­forts to re­store full pay­ments to the vet­er­ans.

And why wouldn’t they? No law­maker, ever, wants to be seen as break­ing faith with “the troops,” so when vet­er­ans were out­raged over $6 bil­lion in cuts to work­ing-age re­tired ser­vice mem­bers, law­makers scrambled to spon­sor bills that would put the fund­ing back in place.

So far, Con­gress’s om­ni­bus spend­ing bill re­moved the be­ne­fits re­duc­tion for vet­er­ans who re­tired for med­ic­al reas­ons, but that was a small part — less than one-tenth — of the total cuts.

And now, for all the hand-wringing over re­vers­ing the rest of the cost-of-liv­ing-ad­just­ment cuts, many of those meas­ures are at­tached to le­gis­la­tion that is go­ing pre­cisely nowhere — in large part be­cause of where they pro­pose to de­crease spend­ing to off­set the vet­er­ans’ cuts.

Take, for ex­ample, a pair of pro­pos­als from Sen. Jeanne Shaheen and Rep. Dan Maf­fei. The Demo­crat­ic duo has in­tro­duced sim­il­ar le­gis­la­tion in their re­spect­ive cham­bers that would swap the COLA cuts by clos­ing a tax loop­hole for off­shore cor­por­a­tions. Shaheen has said she is will­ing to work with mem­bers of both parties, but thus far of the 69 com­bined co­spon­sors for her and Maf­fei’s meas­ures, zero are Re­pub­lic­ans.

Across the aisle, Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Scott Des­Jar­lais of Ten­ness­ee is push­ing to re­store the be­ne­fits us­ing a fa­vor­ite GOP tar­get: the Af­ford­able Care Act. Des­Jar­lais wants to take money from the ACA’s Pre­ven­tion and Pub­lic Health Fund, which he calls “a slush fund.” The meas­ure is a non­starter in Harry Re­id’s Sen­ate.

Mean­while, Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick is re­com­mend­ing Con­gress pay for the pen­sion funds by in­creas­ing re­quire­ments to re­ceive the Re­fund­able Child Tax Cred­it, a move aimed at block­ing un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants from claim­ing the cred­it. Rep. Martha Roby called the pro­pos­al “a fix the Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence can rally around,” and Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Kelly Ayotte is push­ing a sim­il­ar meas­ure in the Sen­ate.

When le­gis­lat­ors in­tro­duce bills that pit be­ne­fits against the oth­er party’s policy pri­or­it­ies, it of­fers them a new av­en­ue to ac­cuse their rivals of “stand­ing with [in­sert polit­ic­ally un­pop­u­lar group here]” in­stead of sup­port­ing vet­er­ans. What it doesn’t of­fer, however, is any help to those vet­er­ans them­selves.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4671) }}

What We're Following See More »
WORDS AND PICTURES
White House Looks Back on bin Laden Mission
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
NO BATTLE OVER SEATTLE
SCOTUS Won’t Hear Appeal of Minimum-Wage Law
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a sweeping constitutional challenge to Seattle’s minimum wage law, in what could have been a test case for future legal attacks on similar measures across the country. In a one-line order, the justices declined to hear a case by the International Franchise Association and a group of Seattle franchisees, which had said in court papers that the city’s gradual wage increase to $15 discriminates against them in a way that violates the Constitution’s commerce clause."

Source:
DOWN TO THE WIRE
Sanders Looks to Right the Ship in Indiana
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Hillary Clinton may have the Democratic nomination sewn up, but Bernie Sanders apparently isn't buying it. Buoyed by a poll showing them in a "virtual tie," Sanders is "holding three rallies on the final day before the state primary and hoping to pull off a win after a tough week of election losses and campaign layoffs." 

Source:
CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION IN JUNE
DC to Release Draft Constitution as Part of Statehood Push
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The New Columbia Statehood Commission—composed of five District leaders including Mayor Muriel Bowser, D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, and D.C.'s congressional delegation—voted today to publicly release a draft of a new constitution for an eventual state next Friday, at the Lincoln Cottage." It's the first step in a statehood push this year that will include a constitutional convention in June and a referendum in November.

Source:
ALZHEIMER’S OUTCRY
Will Ferrell Bails on Reagan Movie
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

Amid outcry by President Reagan's children, actor Will Ferrell has pulled out of a movie that makes light of Reagan's Alzheimer's disease. A spokesperson for Ferrell said, “The ‘Reagan’ script is one of a number of scripts that had been submitted to Will Ferrell which he had considered. While it is by no means an ‘Alzheimer’s comedy’ as has been suggested, Mr. Ferrell is not pursuing this project."

Source:
×