Sen. Rand Paul wants to revoke the administration’s ability to re-invade Iraq at will, and he’s getting tacit support from a seemingly unlikely ally — the White House.
Paul will introduce legislation on Tuesday to repeal the Authorization of the Use of Military Force in Iraq. But it marks one of the few times the White House and the Kentucky Republican — who is known for his strong anti-interventionist streak — agree on a defense issue. They’ve sparred over the past year on the administration’s use of drone strikes, the handling of Syria, and the National Security Agency’s intelligence-gathering programs.
“The Administration supports the repeal of the Iraq AUMF since it is no longer used for any U.S. Government activities,” said Caitlin Hayden, a spokesperson for the White House National Security Council, in a statement to Foreign Policy, which received an advanced copy of the legislation. “We understand that some in Congress are considering legislation related to the Iraq AUMF, and we will certainly examine these proposals as they come forward.”
An administration official noted that repealing the Iraq AUMF was not a priority for the administration because it would be largely symbolic. Paul’s push comes more than two years after the administration announced the end to the Iraq War in late 2011.
But the White House’s hands-off approach to Paul’s legislation could help him gain Democratic supporters. A similar proposal by Paul in 2011 failed by a 30-67 vote.
If Paul’s proposal is successful, the administration could strike back against terrorist activity in Iraq because of the resurgance in al-Qaida-linked violence. Under the AUMF signed by President George W. Bush in 2001 the military can take action nearly anywhere al-Qaida or an al-Qaida-linked group is located.
What We're Following See More »
Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”
"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.
"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."
"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.