What We Lost, When We Lost Fallujah

“Had we known what it would look like now,” says one veteran, “we wouldn’t have done it.”

A member of the Iraqi Civil defense Corps (ICDC) prays at a joint checkpoint with US soldiers at the entrance of the restive city of Fallujah 05 May 2004.
National Journal
Sara Sorcher
Jan. 8, 2014, 9:03 a.m.

Mi­chael Shupp knows what it cost to take Fal­lu­jah.

The former Mar­ine Corps col­on­el com­manded the re­gi­ment­al com­bat team that dis­lodged in­sur­gents from the Ir­aqi city in late 2004. U.S. and Ir­aqi troops went door-to-door, build­ing-to-build­ing hunt­ing in­sur­gents and clear­ing weapons caches to win a crit­ic­al vic­tory. In the pro­cess, more than 100 U.S. sol­diers were killed in what be­came the blood­i­est battle battle of the Ir­aq war. Shupp re­mem­bers watch­ing an Ir­aqi gen­er­al cry as he looked at a wall of the mil­it­ary headquar­ters filled with pho­tos of co­ali­tion troops who were killed fight­ing in­sur­gents — Amer­ic­an and Ir­aqi alike.

But Shupp also re­mem­bers what it meant to take Fal­lu­jah.

He re­mem­bers walk­ing the city’s streets with an Ir­aqi flag he vel­croed to the sleeve of his uni­form. Loc­al Ir­aqis, chil­dren to grown men, would ap­proach him to touch it and say, “Shukran” — Ar­ab­ic for “Thank-you.”

The fight for Fal­lu­jah cap­tiv­ated the Amer­ic­an pub­lic. It was there — and in the rest of the volat­ile but crit­ic­al An­bar province — where the in­sur­gency brewed after the in­va­sion of Ir­aq to over­throw former dic­tat­or Sad­dam Hus­sein, and was later crushed by U.S. sol­diers from the “surge” in 2008.

And so Shupp knows what it means to have lost Fal­lu­jah.

He was home in An­na­pol­is, Md., this week­end when he re­ceived a flood of mes­sages from Mar­ines he fought with — from young en­lis­ted guys to seni­or of­ficers — bring­ing what he calls “heart­break­ing news”: Qaida-linked mil­it­ants had taken con­trol of Fal­lu­jah and parts of Ra­madi, both in An­bar province, where roughly one-third of the total 4,486 Amer­ic­an troops who were killed in that war died. The flags now fly­ing over Fal­lu­jah’s build­ings are black, sym­bols of mil­it­ant con­trol.

Now, like many who fought in Fal­lu­jah, Shupp is won­der­ing how the new Ir­aqi gov­ern­ment lost a city that was won at so steep a cost, and fears have crept in that their sac­ri­fice was in vain.

“I was proud of our Mar­ines, the sac­ri­fice they made, that the fight­ing was fin­ished in the city and they re­stored peace and or­der to it,” he said. “Now, I’m frus­trated. Maybe the Ir­aqis are not liv­ing up to those sac­ri­fices.”

It’s not just the former seni­or lead­ers who are up­set. Rich Weir is a former Mar­ine scout sniper who served there in the winter of 2008. His job was to hide from mil­it­ants in aban­doned build­ings or sand dunes and, de­pend­ing on the mis­sion, re­port back on their activ­it­ies or take out tar­gets. “Everything we did there,” Weir, 26, said, “it seems like it’s all fall­ing apart.”

And Fal­lu­jah vet­er­ans worry about their Ir­aqi com­rades with whom they had grown close but left be­hind as the U.S. wound down its mil­it­ary ef­fort.

Ma­jor Tony Bar­rett, 45, ar­rived in Fal­lu­jah at the end of 2007 as an in­tel­li­gence and tri­bal-en­gage­ment of­ficer. He re­calls a to vis­it one of the tri­bal lead­ers, a staunch op­pon­ent of al-Qaida who told him that the U.S. ef­fort has suc­ceeded in driv­ing away the in­sur­gents. “He said, ‘Yes, Broth­er Tony. They all left.’” But that lead­er has since been killed, and Bar­rett was dis­gus­ted to think of who is con­trolling the area now, and fear­ful for the people who live there.

“[They] are think­ing, ‘These guys are back? You’ve got to be kid­ding me — I’m a vic­tim of this again?’ ” said Bar­rett, now re­tired. “It’s al­most like spit­ting in the face of all the men who gave their lives fight­ing for that city.”

But the city is more than a sym­bol for those who fought. Its fall to mil­it­ants is a dark omen for the new Ir­aqi gov­ern­ment in its ini­tial years of se­cur­ing the coun­try without the help of U.S. troops.

Mil­it­ants have gained strength in re­cent years as Sunni dis­con­tent with the Shiite-led gov­ern­ment grows, and the un­rest spills over from the civil war in neigh­bor­ing Syr­ia. Mil­it­ants seized con­trol of Fal­lu­jah and parts of Ra­madi not long after the ar­rest of a Sunni politi­cian. Ir­aqi se­cur­ity forces cleared a protest camp where Sun­nis had been demon­strat­ing, and the fight­ing cre­ated a se­cur­ity va­cu­um.

The stakes are high: As Prime Min­is­ter Nuri Kamal al-Ma­liki called on res­id­ents of the city to push out mil­it­ants to avoid a siege by his se­cur­ity forces, it’s already clear that a broad mil­it­ary op­er­a­tion could be ugly. It runs the risk of caus­ing many ci­vil­ian cas­u­al­ties, be­cause the loc­al forces do not have the right in­tel­li­gence cap­ab­il­it­ies to launch a pre­cise op­er­a­tion, says Ahmed Ali, seni­or Ir­aq ana­lyst at the In­sti­tute for the Study of War. The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion prom­ised to ex­ped­ite the de­liv­er­ies of mis­siles and sur­veil­lance drones to Bagh­dad, but still, the vi­ol­ence could spread in­to oth­er areas where oth­er Ir­aqi Sun­nis — already feel­ing mar­gin­al­ized by Ma­liki’s Shiite-led gov­ern­ment — could re­act vi­ol­ently.

Yet Doug Ol­li­vant, former dir­ect­or for Ir­aq at the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Coun­cil dur­ing both the Bush and Obama ad­min­is­tra­tions (and a re­tired Army of­ficer) says it’s pos­sible this is a first step to­ward im­prov­ing the situ­ation on the ground in Ir­aq. “The Ir­aqi army has a tar­get; now they know where al-Qaida lives. For so long, they have not been able to find them, and now “¦ that they’re out in the open, the army can mass thou­sands of people on them. It may be ugly, but they’re there.”

Law­makers are re­open­ing the ar­gu­ment over how Pres­id­ent Obama should have handled the U.S. with­draw­al, and fight­ing over wheth­er the fall of Fal­lu­jah is an in­dict­ment of his chosen course.

The White House ar­gues that the pul­lout of Amer­ic­an troops is not to blame for the re­cent sec­tari­an strife in the coun­try, ar­guing there was vi­ol­ence even when 150,000 U.S. troops on the ground.

But Obama’s con­gres­sion­al crit­ics dis­agree. Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Duncan Hunter of Cali­for­nia says he went to a brew­ery in San Diego with some Mar­ine bud­dies who fought with him in Fal­lu­jah, and he says all agreed the fail­ure lies with the pres­id­ent for not strik­ing an agree­ment to leave some troops in the coun­try bey­ond 2011.

“We did our job. We did what we were asked to do, and we won,” Hunter says. “Every single man and wo­man who fought in Ir­aq, es­pe­cially in those cit­ies, feels a kick in the gut for all they did, be­cause this pres­id­ent de­cided to squander their sac­ri­fice.”

Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Adam Kin­zinger of Illinois, an­oth­er Ir­aq vet­er­an, shares this view: “When we left, we ba­sic­ally took away our abil­ity to hold the Ir­aqi gov­ern­ment ac­count­able, to have in­flu­ence.” But now, there are few op­tions for Wash­ing­ton. “Once you pull troops out of a coun­try, it’s very un­real­ist­ic to put any back in, and we shouldn’t do it.”

Mean­while, Fal­lu­jah’s vet­er­ans are mourn­ing what has been lost, as well as re­as­sess­ing their hopes for Fal­lu­jah and Ir­aq.

“We all had a feel­ing of ac­com­plish­ment in rid­ding the city of in­sur­gents and re­turn­ing the city back to the res­id­ents of Fal­lu­jah on the eve of the first Ir­aqi na­tion­al elec­tion in Janu­ary 2005,” says re­tired Lt. Gen. Richard Naton­ski, who com­manded the 1st Mar­ine Di­vi­sion dur­ing the 2004 ground as­sault in Fal­lu­jah. “I am saddened the city and res­id­ents that so many Amer­ic­an, Brit­ish, and Ir­aqi forces sac­ri­ficed so greatly to pro­tect are once again suf­fer­ing un­der a sim­il­ar group that ter­ror­ized the city in 2004.”

Naton­ski says he had been cer­tain — both after the 2004 vic­tory and even when the re­main­ing Amer­ic­an troops pulled out of the coun­try in 2011 — that the city would re­main se­cure. “My con­fid­ence, he says, nev­er waned.” Na­tion­al tele­vi­sion news in­formed him about the city’s cur­rent fate.

Bar­rett says he wor­ries about what the mil­it­ants’ re­cent vic­tory will mean for the work done to re­build the city, as he is sure the ba­sic in­fra­struc­ture the co­ali­tion tried so hard to pro­tect — wa­ter, elec­tri­city, se­cur­ity — is be­ing threatened.

“Al-Qaida is kind of like a can­cer that keeps in­filt­rat­ing these tribes,” Bar­rett said. “It’s just like go­ing back to the dark days.”

And for Weir — who is now a law stu­dent in in Berke­ley, Cal­if. — the fall of Fal­lu­jah is an­oth­er sign that the U.S. fell short of its ini­tial hopes to re­build and se­cure the coun­try.

“We didn’t get out of [Ir­aq] what we wanted to,” Weir said. “Had we known what it would look like now, we wouldn’t have done it.”

What We're Following See More »
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."