Marines Crack Down on Fashionable Hairstyles

New regulations approved by the Corps’ top general ban several different hairdos and make achieving the perfect braid pretty difficult.

A U.S. Marine receives a haircut in Afghanistan in 2012.
National Journal
Marina Koren
Dec. 18, 2013, 11:43 a.m.

The Mar­ine Corps has an­nounced plans to roll out a uni­ver­sal cap for all Mar­ines, modeled after the cov­er cur­rently worn by male mem­bers, fol­low­ing some con­tro­versy over a uni­sex design. Not only that, it’s tight­en­ing its reg­u­la­tions on what ex­actly can be un­der­neath these brand-new caps.

Spe­cific­ally, no “fad­dish” or “ex­ag­ger­ated” hair­styles are al­lowed, ac­cord­ing to a Monday ad­min­is­trat­ive or­der ap­proved by the Corps’ top gen­er­al. “Mean­ing… what, ex­actly?” asks Gawker‘s Adam Wein­stein.

We’re not quite sure, so we’ll let you be the judge. The hair­dos banned while in uni­form in­clude:

LOCKS AND TWISTS (NOT IN­CLUD­ING FRENCH ROLLS/TWISTS), HAIR SCULPT­ING (EC­CENT­RIC DIR­EC­TION­AL FLOW, TWISTS, TEX­TURE OR SPIK­ING), BUNS OR BRAIDS WITH LOOSE HAIR EX­TEND­ING AT THE END….

“Ec­cent­ric” hair­styles are also a big no-no. The Mar­ines define ec­cent­ric as “de­part­ing from the es­tab­lished or tra­di­tion­al norm,” and fad­dish as “a trans­it­ory fash­ion ad­op­ted with wide en­thu­si­asm,” ac­cord­ing to the Mar­ine Corps Times.

The note goes on to de­scribe in great de­tail the prop­er braid pro­tocol for ser­vice­wo­men:

BRAIDS … WHEN WORN, MUL­TIPLE BRAIDS SHALL BE OF UNI­FORM DI­MEN­SION, SMALL IN DIA­MET­ER (AP­PROX. 1/8 TO 1/4 INCH), SHOW NO MORE THAN 1/8 OF AN INCH OF SCALP BETWEEN THE BRAIDS AND MUST BE TIGHTLY IN­TER­WOVEN TO PRESENT A NEAT, PRO­FES­SION­AL, WELL GROOMED AP­PEAR­ANCE.

FOR­EIGN MA­TER­I­AL (I.E., BEADS, DEC­OR­AT­IVE ITEMS) SHALL NOT BE BRAIDED IN­TO THE HAIR. BRAIDS MUST CON­TIN­UE TO THE END OF THE NAT­UR­AL HAIR AND CAN BE WORN LOOSE FROM THAT POINT. WHEN WORN LOOSE, BRAIDS WILL COM­PLY WITH ME­DI­UM OR LONG HAIR LENGTH GUIDELINES, OR BE SE­CURED TO THE HEAD IN ONE DIR­EC­TION, IN STRAIGHT LINES (FORE AND AFT WHEN WEAR­ING A BUN). THE HAIR FORM­ING THE BUN MAY BE UN­BRAIDED. BUNS AND ENDS SHALL BE NEATLY AND IN­CON­SPICU­OUSLY FASTENED OR PINNED.

These re­com­mend­a­tions came from the Mar­ine Corps Uni­form Board, which pre­vi­ously sur­veyed Mar­ines about their pre­ferred hat design. Strict rules about ap­pear­ance are stand­ard in the U.S. mil­it­ary. In Septem­ber, the U.S. Army ap­proved a change in its ap­pear­ance reg­u­la­tions that would ban tat­toos be­low the el­bow or knees.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4631) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×