U.S. Nuclear-Arms Cost Estimate Jumps Up $27 Billion

Technicians perform maintenance on a W-76 nuclear warhead. An 18-year cost estimate for U.S. nuclear-arms operations has jumped up more than $27 billion, the congressional Government Accountability Office said.
National Journal
Diane Barnes
See more stories about...
Diane Barnes
Dec. 13, 2013, 6:02 a.m.

An 18-year spend­ing out­look for U.S. nuc­le­ar arms has shot up by $27.1 bil­lion, and costs could rise fur­ther still, con­gres­sion­al aud­it­ors said this week.

In­vest­ig­at­ors found the in­crease by com­par­ing the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s latest cost es­tim­ate for main­tain­ing and up­dat­ing U.S. nuc­le­ar weapons over a set peri­od — fisc­al years 2014 through 2031 — to the U.S. es­tim­ate from two years ago for the same time­frame, ac­cord­ing to a Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice re­port re­leased Wed­nes­day.

The Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion blamed the up­tick from in part on a change in its cal­cu­la­tion meth­od. The agency — a semi­autonom­ous arm of the En­ergy De­part­ment — noted that its pro­jec­tion from fisc­al 2012 re­lied on out-of-date data based on the now-de­funct Re­li­able Re­place­ment War­head pro­gram, aud­it­ors wrote in the as­sess­ment.

GAO aud­it­ors said a sched­ule ad­just­ment also con­trib­uted to the cost jump, which boos­ted an­ti­cip­ated stock­pile ex­pendit­ures for the 18-year peri­od from $46 bil­lion to $73.1 bil­lion. The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion moved up plans to be­gin mod­ern­iz­ing nuc­le­ar war­heads for the Air Launched Cruise Mis­sile sev­en years soon­er — in 2024 in­stead of 2031 — bring­ing more of the as­so­ci­ated costs in­to the time range un­der scru­tiny.

The es­tim­ate for over­all NNSA spend­ing dur­ing the same peri­od in­creased by just $19 bil­lion, ac­cord­ing to GAO aud­it­ors. They vari­ation, they wrote, is due to de­creases in the agency’s pro­jec­ted spend­ing on oth­er agency activ­it­ies, such as main­ten­ance of the nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al’s sup­port­ing in­fra­struc­ture.

They noted, though, that the agency’s es­tim­ate leaves out “most of the budget es­tim­ates” for two pricey ini­ti­at­ives: con­struct­ing a new en­riched-urani­um pro­cessing plant in Ten­ness­ee, and sus­tain­ing plutoni­um cap­ab­il­it­ies long tied to a pro­posed fa­cil­ity that now faces can­cel­la­tion.

“NNSA plans to con­struct these fa­cil­it­ies or al­tern­at­ives to the fa­cil­it­ies and, as a res­ult, NNSA’s budget es­tim­ates for the in­fra­struc­ture area are not fully aligned with its mod­ern­iz­a­tion plans and likely un­der­es­tim­ate the amount of fund­ing that will be needed in fu­ture years.

The re­port notes sev­er­al factors that could fur­ther shift NNSA cost es­tim­ates in com­ing years, in­clud­ing the agency’s fail­ure to ac­count in its pro­jec­tions to date for budget cuts man­dated un­der the 2011 Budget Con­trol Act. Those “se­quest­ra­tion” re­duc­tions would crimp nuc­le­ar-weapons spend­ing if they re­main in place, the doc­u­ment says.

Its au­thors noted two oth­er vari­ables that could in­crease spend­ing: a pos­sible rise in ex­penses from con­tract­or re­tire­ment funds, and “cost sav­ings” built in­to budget es­tim­ates without full as­sess­ments of how to achieve them.

This art­icle was pub­lished in Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire, which is pro­duced in­de­pend­ently by Na­tion­al Journ­al Group un­der con­tract with the Nuc­le­ar Threat Ini­ti­at­ive. NTI is a non­profit, non­par­tis­an group work­ing to re­duce glob­al threats from nuc­le­ar, bio­lo­gic­al, and chem­ic­al weapons.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×