NSA to Retain Military Leadership

The move rejects an upcoming report that suggests putting the agency under civilian control.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 30: U.S. Army Gen. Keith Alexander, director of the National Security Agency and commander of U.S. Cyber Command, speaks during a conference at the Ronald Reagan Building, October 30,2013 in Washington, DC. General Alexander spoke about Cybersecurity at a conference hosted by Bloomberg Government.  
National Journal
Jordain Carney
Dec. 13, 2013, 9:54 a.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion guar­an­teed that the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency will con­tin­ue to be led by a mil­it­ary of­fi­cial, de­fy­ing a grow­ing push to put the spy agency un­der the pur­view of a ci­vil­ian.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion guar­an­teed on­go­ing mil­it­ary su­per­vi­sion when it de­cided the NSA dir­ect­or will con­tin­ue to also lead Cy­ber Com­mand, which must be over­seen by a mil­it­ary of­ficer.

The de­cision, an­nounced Fri­day by White House’s Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Coun­cil spokes­wo­man Caitlin Hay­den, comes less than a day after of­fi­cials leaked news that a highly an­ti­cip­ated re­port would sug­gest a ci­vil­ian take over the NSA’s top spot. The re­port by the Re­view Group on In­tel­li­gence and Com­mu­nic­a­tions Tech­no­logy is ex­pec­ted to be form­ally sub­mit­ted to the White House by Sunday.

But the ad­min­is­tra­tion is mov­ing in the op­pos­ite dir­ec­tion.

“Fol­low­ing a thor­ough in­ter­agency re­view, the Ad­min­is­tra­tion has de­cided that keep­ing the po­s­i­tions of NSA Dir­ect­or and Cy­ber Com­mand Com­mand­er to­geth­er as one, dual-hat­ted po­s­i­tion is the most ef­fect­ive ap­proach to ac­com­plish­ing both agen­cies’ mis­sions,” Hay­den said.

There has been a grow­ing push for the NSA to be led by a ci­vil­ian, out of con­cerns that hav­ing one per­son with a dual role un­ne­ces­sar­ily con­cen­trated too much power. Keith Al­ex­an­der, a four-star gen­er­al who cur­rently holds both po­s­i­tions, is ex­pec­ted to step down this spring.

Hay­den noted that Al­ex­an­der’s re­tire­ment provided the ad­min­is­tra­tion with a “nat­ur­al time” to re­view the ex­ist­ing ar­range­ment. Al­ex­an­der has re­peatedly pushed for the roles to re­main linked after his de­par­ture.

“Without the dual-hat ar­range­ment, elab­or­ate pro­ced­ures would have to be put in place to en­sure that ef­fect­ive co­ordin­a­tion con­tin­ued and avoid cre­at­ing du­plic­at­ive cap­ab­il­it­ies in each or­gan­iz­a­tion,” Hay­den ad­ded.

Pres­id­ent Obama com­mis­sioned the re­view pan­el in Au­gust amid grow­ing con­cern about the agency’s in­tel­li­gence-gath­er­ing tac­tics. The NSA has been pil­lor­ied this year as leaked doc­u­ments from former con­tract­or Ed­ward Snowden have shed light on the agency’s in­tern­al work­ings.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×