Budget Agreement Eases Pentagon’s Sequester Pain

Aerial photograph of the Pentagon in Arlington, Va., on Sept. 26, 2003.  DoD photo by Tech. Sgt. Andy Dunaway, U.S. Air Force. 
National Journal
Sara Sorcher and Stacy Kaper
Sara Sorcher Stacy Kaper
Dec. 10, 2013, 2:25 p.m.

The two-year budget agree­ment is a pos­it­ive de­vel­op­ment for de­fense watch­ers — mit­ig­at­ing about half the se­quester cuts ex­pec­ted to gouge the de­fense budget in fisc­al year 2014.

The agree­ment, an­nounced Tues­day night by Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray, D-Wash., and House Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­man Paul Ry­an, R-Wis., would provide $63 bil­lion in se­quester re­lief over two years, split evenly between de­fense and nondefense pro­grams. By some simple math, that leaves some $31.5 bil­lion in se­quester re­lief for de­fense over the two-year peri­od.

The Pentagon was fa­cing a roughly $52 bil­lion cut from its $527 bil­lion re­quest in fisc­al year 2014. Now, the budget agree­ment says de­fense dis­cre­tion­ary spend­ing would be set at $520.5 bil­lion that year. That fig­ure pre­sum­ably in­cludes the De­part­ment of En­ergy’s nuc­le­ar-weapons pro­grams, mean­ing the de­part­ment will likely be work­ing with closer to a half-tril­lion-dol­lars in fund­ing in fisc­al 2014 — and, to do so, it has front-loaded most of the new­found se­quester re­lief.

“This is a pos­it­ive out­come for the mil­it­ary and in par­tic­u­lar, for the de­fense in­dustry,” Lex­ing­ton In­sti­tute Chief Op­er­at­ing Of­ficer Loren Thompson told Na­tion­al Journ­al, “be­cause it means the pres­id­ent’s re­quest for the Pentagon would only be cut by about 5 per­cent, where the caps would have put it $52 bil­lion lower. What the se­quester re­lief does is, in ef­fect, re­duce the cut to the Pentagon’s base budget in half.”

While the agree­ment doesn’t stave off se­quest­ra­tion’s im­pact on de­fense com­pletely, Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee mem­ber Sen. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz., said “it softens it.” He con­firmed that the se­quester re­lief is “much more” in the first year of the two-year deal.

The im­plic­a­tion of this un­even dis­tri­bu­tion in se­quester re­lief means that fisc­al year 2015 will see less ex­tra money to play around with from this deal.

Thompson, however, cau­tions, “We shouldn’t as­sume any of these agree­ments mean much bey­ond the year in which they are passed — the 2014 num­ber is the one that really mat­ters. Who knows what will hap­pen bey­ond the elec­tion?”

What We're Following See More »
Trump Finance Guru Has History of Contributing to Dems
7 minutes ago

"Like Donald Trump himself, the Trump campaign’s new national finance chairman has a long history of contributing to Democrats—including Hillary Clinton. Private investor Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s new campaign fundraising guru, has contributed more than $120,000" to candidates since 1995, about half of which has gone to Democrats.

Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
16 hours ago

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
18 hours ago

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
18 hours ago
Romney to Skip Convention
19 hours ago

An aide to Mitt Romney confirmed to the Washington Post that the 2102 GOP nominee will not attend the Republican convention this year. He joins the two living Republican presidents, George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush, as well as 2008 nominee John McCain in skipping the event. Even among living Republican nominees, that leaves only Bob Dole who could conceivably show up. Dole did say in January that he'd prefer Trump to Ted Cruz, but his age (92) could keep him from attending.