Think Globally, Act Locally

No “¦ seriously. Because when it comes to climate change, Washington won’t help.

The smoke stacks at American Electric Power's (AEP) Mountaineer coal power plant in New Haven, West Virginia, October 30, 2009. In cooperation with AEP, the French company Alstom unveiled the world's largest carbon capture facility at a coal plant, so called 'clean coal,' which will store around 100,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide a year 2.1 kilometers (7,200 feet) underground. 
National Journal
Major Garrett
May 6, 2014, 8 a.m.

You’ve heard the phrase a mil­lion times. It’s be­come an en­vir­on­ment­al ear­worm.

Now, nearly 100 years after Patrick Geddes pub­lished Cit­ies in Evol­u­tion, the book many as­sert gave rise to the concept of “Think Glob­ally, Act Loc­ally,” that phrase now may have ac­tu­al, prac­tic­al mean­ing.

Among the most in­ter­est­ing parts of the Na­tion­al Cli­mate As­sess­ment is its em­phas­is on what loc­al and state gov­ern­ments can do to ad­apt to cli­mate change and min­im­ize its po­ten­tial rav­ages.

Con­sider this sec­tion: “Build­ing codes and land­scap­ing or­din­ances could be up­dated to im­prove en­ergy ef­fi­ciency, con­serve wa­ter sup­plies, pro­tect against in­sects that spread dis­ease (such as dengue fever), re­duce sus­cept­ib­il­ity to heat stress, and im­prove pro­tec­tion against ex­treme events.” The last time I checked, neither Con­gress nor the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment de­term­ined build­ing codes or re­worked or­din­ance on loc­al wa­ter sup­plies or en­ergy ef­fi­ciency.

The re­port also em­phas­izes the need for “flex­ib­il­ity and re­si­li­ence in the face of on­go­ing and fu­ture im­pacts.” As any­one who has been through a cata­stroph­ic weath­er event can tell you, FEMA can help, but what cit­ies and states must do in the im­me­di­ate af­ter­math is be flex­ible and re­si­li­ent. Neither are pri­or­it­ies in Wash­ing­ton just now. Not on cli­mate change or any­thing else.

“The re­port does an ex­cel­lent job of mak­ing the point that cli­mate change is hap­pen­ing now,” Jerry Me­lillo, lead au­thor of the Na­tion­al Cli­mate As­sess­ment, told me. “It is not an is­sue you can think about 20 or 30 years in­to the fu­ture. All Amer­ic­ans in some way — either dir­ectly or in­dir­ectly — are cur­rently be­ing af­fected by cli­mate change.”

The re­port pays, as it must, prop­er de­fer­ence to “in­ter­na­tion­al treat­ies” and new “fed­er­al” laws and “na­tion­al strategies.” But it is worth not­ing that this re­port — the most com­pre­hens­ive of its kind — places no stress on new policy re­com­mend­a­tions or laws. It does sug­gest cit­ies and states get ahead of the game by judging the risks of cli­mate change and act­ing ac­cord­ingly.

Again, from the re­port: “Us­ing sci­entif­ic in­form­a­tion to pre­pare for cli­mate changes in ad­vance can provide eco­nom­ic op­por­tun­it­ies and pro­act­ively man­aging the risks can re­duce im­pacts and costs over time.”

It doesn’t ex­actly scream, “Hey, you’re on your own!” But it comes close.

Pres­id­ent Obama has not touched cli­mate-change le­gis­la­tion since the Sen­ate re­fused to con­sider a House-passed bill in 2010 that in­creased car­bon taxes. And Obama’s not go­ing to push for any new le­gis­la­tion to raise car­bon taxes now.

“We’ve made clear that we are not pur­su­ing that and have not and have no plans to,” White House press sec­ret­ary Jay Car­ney said Tues­day. “So I sup­pose that would make its vi­va­cious­ness a little lim­ited here.”

You’ve heard of death by a thou­sand cuts? Cli­mate-change le­gis­la­tion died from lim­ited vi­va­cious­ness. Talk about an in­vis­ible killer. Obama did, after months of elec­tion-year dither­ing, im­pose new reg­u­la­tions on fu­ture coal-fired power plants. The En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency is pre­par­ing long-awaited lim­its on car­bon-based emis­sions from ex­ist­ing coal-fired power plants. The Su­preme Court re­cently up­held the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s power to im­pose these new reg­u­la­tions un­der the Clean Air Act.

But that does not mean the in­dustry will not fight the reg­u­la­tions in court or that con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans, deeply skep­tic­al of cli­mate sci­ence and a fed­er­al reg­u­lat­ory re­sponse, will not seek to delay or de­rail the new pol­lu­tion lim­its. Re­pub­lic­ans call the reg­u­la­tions job killers. They also con­sider them in­ef­fect­ive in a glob­al­ized eco­nomy where coun­tries like China, In­dia, and Brazil con­tin­ue to belch out enorm­ous amounts of car­bon-based pol­lu­tion.

In this, sur­pris­ingly, Me­lillo at least par­tially agrees.

“The solu­tion to the cli­mate-change prob­lem is glob­al,” Me­lillo said. “We have to do what we can to make Amer­ica se­cure and sus­tain­able, but in or­der to ad­dress the root cause of the prob­lem, the emis­sion of green­house gases, coun­tries like In­dia, China, Brazil — they have to do their share as well.”

The pro­spects of glob­al ac­tion to re­duce car­bon-based pol­lu­tion are as slim if not slim­mer than con­gres­sion­al ac­tion. In the hier­archy of needs, de­vel­op­ing eco­nom­ies like China, In­dia, and Brazil have, at least so far, placed in­dus­tri­al and man­u­fac­tur­ing growth over pol­lu­tion con­trol. That may change in the years to come, but the Na­tion­al Cli­mate As­sess­ment placed new em­phas­is on what states and cit­ies can do to pro­tect them­selves and their res­id­ents.

As states and cit­ies be­come more nimble and re­spons­ive labor­at­or­ies of demo­cracy, reg­u­la­tion, and tax­a­tion, per­haps the time has come for the cli­mate-change de­bate to be­come much smal­ler, more loc­al, and less at­tuned to gran­di­ose aims.

And that might mean the death of the ear­worm but the re­birth of polit­ic­ally vi­able en­vir­on­ment­al­ism.

The au­thor is Na­tion­al Journ­al cor­res­pond­ent-at-large and chief White House cor­res­pond­ent for CBS News. He is also a dis­tin­guished fel­low at the George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity School of Me­dia and Pub­lic Af­fairs.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×