Pork Is Back on the Table in Mississippi

Republican primary battles have Cochran and Taylor touting their support for now-banned earmarks.

WASHINGTON - JUNE 09: Committee Chairman U.S. Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI) (L) and Vice Chairman Senator Thad Cochran (R-MS) (R) discuss the proposed 2010 Defense Department budget at a hearing of the Defense Subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations Committee on Capitol Hill on June 9, 2009 in Washington, DC. U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and U.S. Navy Admiral Michael Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the actions taken there in the next year and a half will show if progress is being made in Afghanistan.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
April 28, 2014, 5:44 p.m.

A fight over ear­marks isn’t un­usu­al in a Re­pub­lic­an primary. Two GOP con­tests in Mis­sis­sippi, however, are flip­ping the usu­al terms of the de­bate.

A pair of Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates — Sen. Thad Co­chran and former Demo­crat­ic con­gress­man-turned-GOP chal­lenger Gene Taylor — are em­bra­cing the now-banned prac­tice some­times labeled pork-bar­rel spend­ing, us­ing it not only to bol­ster their own cam­paigns but to cudgel their foes.

If that seems strange, it should: The Re­pub­lic­an Party has all but driv­en sup­port­ers of ear­marks from its ranks, con­vinced that they’re the hall­mark of politi­cians who don’t ad­here to con­ser­vat­ive prin­ciples.

But Co­chran and Taylor are ar­guing that ear­marks of­fer an es­sen­tial sup­ply of money to cash-strapped Mis­sis­sippi — with each cit­ing the dev­ast­a­tion wrought on the Gulf Coast by Hur­ricane Kat­rina as a prime ex­ample. On the cam­paign trail and in ads, they’re call­ing out their op­pon­ents’ po­s­i­tions by name.

One such ad, pro­duced by a su­per PAC back­ing the long-term in­cum­bent Co­chran, blasts his op­pon­ent, GOP state Sen. Chris McDaniel, for equi­voc­at­ing in an in­ter­view earli­er this year over wheth­er he would have sup­por­ted a fisc­al re­lief bill for the re­gion after the 2005 hur­ricane.

“Chris McDaniel: We just can’t count on him,” a nar­rat­or in­tones, after au­dio of the state sen­at­or’s in­ter­view plays.

The be­gin­ning of the spot touted Co­chran’s own ef­forts to sup­port the le­gis­la­tion and bring money back to the state, set­ting up an­oth­er clear con­trast between the two can­did­ates. (They also have a sub­stan­tial age dif­fer­ence; Co­chran is 76 and McDaniel is 41.)

Taylor, mean­while, has been out­spoken in his cam­paign against Rep. Steven Palazzo, cri­ti­ciz­ing the two-term Re­pub­lic­an in­cum­bent for op­pos­ing a re­lief bill in 2013 for vic­tims of Hur­ricane Sandy. Like Co­chran, Taylor touts his own ef­forts to work with the state’s del­eg­a­tion to pass a re­lief bill after Hur­ricane Kat­rina.

“He ba­sic­ally stuck his fin­ger in their eye,” Taylor said dur­ing the open­ing event of his cam­paign rol­lout in late March, ac­cord­ing to The Mis­sis­sippi Press. “It’s un­be­liev­able that after all we’ve been through, after ask­ing for Kat­rina aid him­self, he would say no to Hur­ricane Sandy vic­tims.”

Co­chran and Taylor come from very dif­fer­ent back­grounds: The six-term sen­at­or and mas­ter ap­pro­pri­at­or has been a pil­lar of the Re­pub­lic­an Party in Mis­sis­sippi since the 1970s, while Taylor last held of­fice as a Demo­crat un­til Palazzo beat him dur­ing the 2010 Re­pub­lic­an wave. He of­fi­cially switched parties only this year.

But both rep­res­ent the old-guard polit­ic­al es­tab­lish­ment, a throw­back to a time when de­liv­er­ing pork-bar­rel spend­ing to con­stitu­ents was viewed not only as a pos­it­ive but as a ne­ces­sary func­tion of the job. The cal­cu­la­tion is that even as Re­pub­lic­an polit­ics has be­come less tol­er­ant of ideo­lo­gic­al de­vi­ations in re­cent years, Mis­sis­sippi con­ser­vat­ives will still look fondly enough back on how things used to be done that they’ll send both men back to Wash­ing­ton.

To be sure, their op­pon­ents wel­come the fight. They’re con­fid­ent that voters will ul­ti­mately pro­cess the elec­tion not as a choice between the good old days of the past and an un­cer­tain fu­ture, but as a de­cision between au­then­t­ic con­ser­vat­ives and mod­er­ate squishes.

“What we’ve proven, time and time again, is that once voters real­ize that sen­at­ors like Thad Co­chran traded fund­ing for things like a lob­ster in­sti­tute in Maine or a “˜bridge to nowhere’ in Alaska in ex­change for pa­ro­chi­al pro­jects back home, they quickly be­gin to blame both the ear­marks and the people who voted for them for our $17 tril­lion in debt,” said Barney Keller, spokes­man for the con­ser­vat­ive Club for Growth.

Con­ser­vat­ive groups have lined up be­hind McDaniel’s quest to un­seat Co­chran, mak­ing him ar­gu­ably the single biggest tar­get with­in the GOP es­tab­lish­ment this year. They’ve sought to make Co­chran part of the past, a sym­bol of a dys­func­tion­al polit­ic­al sys­tem that has failed the coun­try.

That’s where Co­chran’s con­tin­ued sup­port of ear­marks could re­turn to haunt him — not be­cause of the an­ger it eli­cits among voters, but be­cause it could as­so­ci­ate him with a past many con­ser­vat­ives don’t re­gard kindly.

“Thad Co­chran doesn’t have a primary fight purely be­cause of ear­marks. He’s vul­ner­able be­cause over five dec­ades in Wash­ing­ton he’s be­come part of the prob­lem and the reas­on we have $17 tril­lion in debt,” Keller said. “Ear­marks are part of the story, but those, com­bined with his sup­port for bail­outs, tax hikes, and his sup­port for Obama’s debt-lim­it in­creases, tell the tale of a sen­at­or far too lib­er­al for a con­ser­vat­ive state like Mis­sis­sippi.”

Any sug­ges­tion the Mis­sis­sippi duo sig­nals a new em­brace of ear­marks among Re­pub­lic­ans seems doubt­ful. In most Re­pub­lic­an primar­ies across the coun­try, can­did­ates would soon­er dis­cuss re­peal­ing the 16th Amend­ment or ab­ol­ish­ing the De­part­ment of Edu­ca­tion than bring­ing back ear­marks.

But in Mis­sis­sippi — for now — they’re mak­ing a comeback. It’s up to voters to de­cide wheth­er the prac­tice should be re­vived.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×