Cliven Bundy Boxes GOP Into a Corner

And party leaders haven’t been doing enough to avoid connections to racist figures.

BUNKERVILLE, NV - APRIL 24: Rancher Cliven Bundy speaks during a news conference near his ranch on April 24, 2014 in Bunkerville, Nevada. The Bureau of Land Management and Bundy have been locked in a dispute for a couple of decades over grazing rights on public lands. (Photo by David Becker/Getty Images)
National Journal
James Oliphant
April 27, 2014, 7:44 a.m.

The Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee’s top spokes­man, Sean Spicer, took to CNN Fri­day to dis­tance his party from Nevada ranch­er Cliven Bundy and slam the me­dia for con­nect­ing the two. “The is­sue of Cliven Bundy has ab­so­lutely noth­ing to do with this party. Zero,” an in­dig­nant Spicer said.

Un­for­tu­nately for the GOP, it hasn’t been that easy to get off the hook.

The reas­ons why are less about wheth­er Re­pub­lic­an law­makers by and large agree with the pu­erile re­marks Bundy made to The New York Times; they don’t — and many were quick to con­demn them. And it isn’t even so much about the party’s lack of di­versity, both with­in the party and among its base.

Rather, it’s about some in the party’s un­ceas­ing will­ing­ness, now in year six, to em­brace any cause that can help drive a wedge between the elect­or­ate and Pres­id­ent Obama, re­gard­less of how sus­pect it might be. It’s about fa­vor­ing hot rhet­or­ic and red meat over reas­on and about the re­fus­al of the GOP’s lead­ers to stand up to some of its more rad­ic­al ele­ments.

More spe­cific­ally, it’s about the nar­rat­ive that Obama is power-mad, the en­for­cer of an ever-en­croach­ing fed­er­al gov­ern­ment that is a threat to life and liberty. (Not only is it an ex­ag­ger­a­tion, but it’s en­tirely at odds with the in­side-Wash­ing­ton view among some crit­ics that the pres­id­ent is lack­ing when it comes to us­ing the tools of of­fice.)

In that con­text, Bundy was made-to-or­der un­til he re­vealed him­self to be old-school in all the wrong ways. Two of the prime pur­vey­ors of the meme hap­pen to be two of the most prom­in­ent con­tenders for the 2016 pres­id­en­tial nom­in­a­tion, Sens. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz. They, along with Fox News host Sean Han­nity, voiced sym­pathy for the ranch­er, nev­er mind the fact that Bundy was an avowed law-break­er with a taste for armed in­sur­rec­tion whose be­lief that the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment has no au­thor­ity over him stirs the echoes of the ‘50s — the 1850s.

A key part of the Cruz-Paul-Han­nity nar­rat­ive is that Obama’s elec­tion has ushered in a peri­od of de­cline of Amer­ic­an val­ues, that the ba­sic so­cial or­der is at risk. As Ari­zona con­ser­vat­ive act­iv­ist Con­stantin Quer­ard told me last month in Phoenix, “We’re get­ting close to the pre­cip­ice. When you feel things slip­ping way, things be­come ur­gent.”

On Fri­day, Wayne LaPierre, the of­ten-apo­ca­lyptic head of the Na­tion­al Rifle As­so­ci­ation, said that very thing in ad­dress­ing the group’s an­nu­al con­ven­tion in In­di­ana­pol­is. “Gun rights, where we are right now in this coun­try, have be­come a meta­phor for a feel­ing it’s kind of all slip­ping away,” he told the crowd.

“Al­most every­where you look, something has gone wrong,” he con­tin­ued. “You feel it in your heart, you know it in your gut. Something has gone wrong. The core val­ues we be­lieve in, the things we care about most, are chan­ging.”

It would be easy to dis­miss LaPierre’s words as a simple fun­drais­ing pitch if not for the fact that Mitch Mc­Con­nell, po­ten­tially the next Sen­ate ma­jor­ity lead­er, fol­lowed him to the po­di­um and com­pared the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to a “ba­nana re­pub­lic.”

“They are try­ing to burn the rights of those they dis­agree with,” Mc­Con­nell said. “Wheth­er it is your right to bear arms or it is your right to speak up without fear of gov­ern­ment in­tim­id­a­tion.”

It isn’t that great a leap from Mc­Con­nell and LaPierre’s words to the cries of ” jack-booted thugs” dur­ing the Clin­ton ad­min­is­tra­tion, but Obama’s status as the na­tion’s first Afric­an-Amer­ic­an pres­id­ent and the demo­graph­ic shift he rep­res­ents provides new in­ter­pret­a­tions to as­ser­tions of “core val­ues” slip­ping away.

Mc­Con­nell him­self neatly en­cap­su­lates the push-pull with­in the party, an es­tab­lish­ment fig­ure try­ing to re­cast him­self as a Tea Party Hero in re­sponse to a primary threat, a one-time Sen­ate deal­maker turned com­mit­ted ob­struc­tion­ist.

Mc­Con­nell has had a front-row seat in which to wit­ness the rise of Paul and the strain of Re­pub­lic­an­ism he rep­res­ents — and he has rarely shown much will­ing­ness to take his fel­low Ken­tucki­an on. Just two months ago, at the Con­ser­vat­ive Polit­ic­al Ac­tion Con­fer­ence, Paul warned of Obama’s ex­ec­ut­ive-or­der push. “A tyranny will en­sue,” he said. Cruz, for his part, has likened the pres­id­ent to a ” cor­rupt dic­tat­or.” (Google “Obama­care” or “Com­mon Core” and “tyranny” is likely to be one of the first words to sur­face.)

None of this is new, of course. Obama’s elec­tion seemed to grant li­cense for Re­pub­lic­an politi­cians to re­define ac­cept­able dis­course — from Rep. Joe Wilson yelling “you lie” dur­ing a pres­id­en­tial ad­dress, to Sarah Pal­in de­fend­ing Ted Nu­gent, to Jim De­Mint giv­ing the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment no cred­it for end­ing slavery. And yes, Demo­crats have their rad­ic­al ele­ments too and their own over-the-top me­dia mo­ments.

But like it or not, Cruz and Paul are two of the most cha­ris­mat­ic per­so­nas the party has — and its es­tab­lish­ment wing can’t seem to find someone to rally be­hind to coun­ter­mand their in­flu­ence in ad­vance of 2016, which means their power is likely to grow, not shrink. And that means that GOP of­fi­cials such as Sean Spicer can’t be sur­prised when their ac­tions are viewed as the party’s own.

What We're Following See More »
A RARE KIND OF REBUKE
Leading Republicans Would Say ‘No Thanks’ If Asked to Be Trump’s VP
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Nikki Haley. Jeb Bush. Scott Walker. Lindsey Graham. John Kasich. The list is growing ever longer of Republicans who say they wouldn't even consider becoming Donald Trump's running mate. "The recoiling amounts to a rare rebuke for a front-runner: Politicians usually signal that they are not interested politely through back channels, or submit to the selection process, if only to burnish their national profiles."

Source:
NEW WSJ/NBC/MARIST POLL
Trump Decisively Ahead in Indiana
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump holds a 15-point lead over Ted Cruz in the potentially decisive May 3 presidential primary race in Indiana, according to results from a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist poll. Trump gets support from 49 percent of likely Republican primary voters — followed by Cruz at 34 percent and John Kasich at 13 percent. If that margin in Indiana holds on Tuesday, Trump would be on a glide path towards obtaining the 1,237 delegates he needs to win the Republican nomination on a first ballot at the GOP convention in July."

Source:
TAKING A ‘GAP YEAR’ IN BETWEEN
Obamas’ Eldest Daughter Will Attend Harvard
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a statement released on Sunday, President and Mrs. Obama revealed that their oldest daughter, Malia, will attend Harvard University in the fall of 2017 as a member of the Class of 2021. She will take a year off before beginning school.

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
×