Google to Obama: Leave Us Out of Your Spying Fight

Silicon Valley doesn’t want people to confuse NSA prying with private data mining.

Caption:MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA - JANUARY 30: A sign is posted on the exterior of Google headquarters on January 30, 2014 in Mountain View, California. Google reported a 17 percent rise in fourth quarter earnings with profits of $3.38 billion, or $9.90 a share compared to $2.9 billion, or $8.62 per share one year ago.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
April 8, 2014, 2:59 p.m.

Google is get­ting nervous.

On the one hand, the In­ter­net be­hemoth wants the pub­lic to know it’s out­raged by U.S. sur­veil­lance pro­grams and is ag­gress­ively lob­by­ing for new rules to keep its cus­tom­ers’ data safe from the gov­ern­ment’s pry­ing eyes.

But as pub­lic at­ten­tion turns to data pri­vacy, Google, Face­book, Ya­hoo, and oth­er tech gi­ants want to be sure that their own data-gath­er­ing prac­tices don’t get lumped in with the fed­er­al spy­ing pro­grams that are the tar­get of pop­u­lar ire.

At the top of their worry list: The White House is hold­ing the two up side-by-side. In Pres­id­ent Obama’s speech in Janu­ary out­lining Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency re­forms, he also ordered a John Podesta-led re­view of “big data,” the col­lec­tion and stor­age of massive amounts of per­son­al in­form­a­tion — in­clud­ing by private com­pan­ies.

The im­pli­cit mes­sage from the White House is that while the pub­lic has raised le­git­im­ate pri­vacy con­cerns about NSA spy­ing, sim­il­ar data-min­ing prac­tices by private com­pan­ies shouldn’t es­cape scru­tiny.

So when White House of­fi­cials in­vited out­side in­put from the pub­lic on the “big data” re­view, the tech world’s loudest voices were more than happy to of­fer an ear­ful. The com­pan­ies’ oft-re­peated mes­sage to the ad­min­is­tra­tion: Don’t con­flate your spy­ing prac­tices with our data-pri­vacy plans.

“We urge the ad­min­is­tra­tion to be cog­niz­ant that gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance and com­mer­cial pri­vacy are sep­ar­ate and dis­tinct is­sues,” the In­ter­net As­so­ci­ation, a lob­by­ing group that rep­res­ents Google, Face­book, Ya­hoo, and oth­ers, wrote in a com­ment. “Giv­en that In­ter­net com­pan­ies aim to provide trans­par­ency, choice, and con­trol to con­sumers, ef­forts to con­flate these is­sues are coun­ter­pro­duct­ive, par­tic­u­larly giv­en how little trans­par­ency cit­izens cur­rently have when it comes to gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance.”

BSA — a soft­ware lob­by­ing group that in­cludes Apple, Mi­crosoft, and IBM — urged the White House to make all ef­forts to “avoid con­flat­ing gov­ern­ment and com­mer­cial in­terests in data.”

One tech­no­logy-in­dustry lob­by­ist said there is wide­spread frus­tra­tion with the White House for con­duct­ing the big-data and NSA re­views in par­al­lel.

“Com­pan­ies have very spe­cif­ic re­la­tion­ships with their users, and they tell them what they’re do­ing with their data,” the tech lob­by­ist said, adding that it is an “apples and or­anges” com­par­is­on to NSA sur­veil­lance.

The White House did not re­spond to a re­quest for com­ment.

Tech com­pan­ies are lob­by­ing against NSA spy­ing be­cause they worry it could un­der­mine trust in their ser­vices. But they de­pend on the abil­ity to har­vest data about users to tar­get ad­vert­ising and to provide oth­er ser­vices.

The White House has ac­know­ledged — and the tech com­pan­ies have em­phas­ized — that massive data­bases can power in­nov­at­ive new ser­vices that be­ne­fit con­sumers. The in­dustry points to ser­vices that more ef­fect­ively scan emails for spam, help drivers avoid traffic, and pre­dict the weath­er. Data are also help­ing sci­ent­ists study dis­eases and de­vel­op more-ef­fect­ive treat­ments.

Gautam Hans, an at­tor­ney for the Cen­ter for Demo­cracy and Tech­no­logy, a con­sumer-ad­vocacy group, agreed that the con­cerns about gov­ern­ment and private uses of data are dif­fer­ent. But he ar­gued that Con­gress should en­act more lim­it­a­tions on how private com­pan­ies can col­lect and handle private in­form­a­tion.

“In the big-data con­text, much of it is sens­it­ive in­form­a­tion like health data or loc­a­tion data, so private com­pan­ies all need to re­cog­nize that pri­vacy and se­cur­ity are im­port­ant, and these are not min­im­al con­cerns,” he said.

Al­though the tech com­pan­ies are nervous about hav­ing the spot­light on them, the chances for new on­line-pri­vacy reg­u­la­tions still ap­pear slim. The White House an­nounced a “Con­sumer Pri­vacy Bill of Rights” in 2012, but the is­sue has gone nowhere on Cap­it­ol Hill.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4875) }}

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.