The political turbulence in recent days between Rep. Jeb Hensarling and Majority Leader Eric Cantor over a flood-insurance bill may offer a window on early jockeying for top positions in the House GOP when Speaker John Boehner departs.
Boehner has expressed no intention of leaving anytime soon, but he will step aside someday. Cantor and Hensarling are both talked about as potential successors, and disagreements between them can raise political questions.
Cantor, the No. 2 House Republican, is widely seen as the odds-on favorite to replace Boehner, with broad support across the conference.
“That means Cantor and his staff — they look around and wonder about challengers,” a senior House lawmaker said Wednesday. “They see three or four guys, and Hensarling’s right there at the top.”
On the flood bill, some in the House Republican Conference said they were disappointed that Cantor bypassed the normal committee process to push through a deal with Democrats. Hensarling, a Texan who chairs the Financial Services Committee, would normally control the makings of such a bill. Yet in the end, Hensarling and 85 other Republicans — including 11 other House committee chairs — voted against the measure Cantor worked out.
“Obviously, he tried to not have that happen,” Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp said of Hensarling, adding, “If it were a Ways and Means issue, I wouldn’t be happy.”
Neither Cantor nor Hensarling responded to requests to discuss their working relationship and the future of conference leadership. And others simply don’t see any importance in the disagreement over the flood-insurance bill. “That’s ridiculous,” one senior leadership aide said Wednesday. “It is obviously ridiculous.”
Hensarling has experience in House GOP leadership, but he chose to leave the No. 4-ranked conference chairmanship to chair Financial Services in 2013. While much speculation has centered on Hensarling as a potential rival to Cantor for speaker, some lawmakers and senior aides say he is more likely to fill another leadership post.
Many say a conservative who could get more tea-party buy-in will have to be brought into the current power structure — meaning the top three posts in the conference — once Boehner leaves. Hensarling, as well as Reps. Tom Price and Steve Scalise, are those mentioned most often.
What is known for sure is that other issues coming before Hensarling’s committee could divide the two men, and parts of the conference. One will be whether to recharter the Export-Import Bank. The bank supports loans to overseas companies to help them buy U.S. exports. Hensarling voted against reauthorization in 2012, while Cantor was instrumental in fashioning a package that got that earlier reauthorization through.
Some Republicans say that is the difference between Hensarling and Cantor: the question of principles versus pragmatism.
Hensarling, a former Republican Study Committee chair, is viewed as being committed to his hawkish fiscal principles and someone who will not compromise his stature as a conservative. It was Hensarling who got rave reviews from groups like the Club for Growth on the flood-insurance bill. “House Republican leadership wants to stick taxpayers with a bill for higher subsidies to beachfront properties, but Congressman Hensarling took a principled stand,” said former Rep. Chris Chocola, the group’s president, in a statement.
But there are other views. One senior House leadership aide said that while Hensarling will stick to positions as a matter of principle, the point of being a committee chairman — and a member of Republican leadership — is to get legislation passed that can address problems.
In the case of the flood-insurance bill, many House Republicans were under pressure from constituents in flood-prone areas who were experiencing skyrocketing premiums, the unintended consequence of reforms to a federal insurance program. Whip counts showed that some Republicans, in the absence of a House Republican bill, were ready to vote for a Senate measure that most Republicans saw as inferior.
Given the standstill in Hensarling’s committee, Cantor stepped in, chaired a handful of meetings that Hensarling and other committee members participated in, and arrived at a deal with Democrats. “I think Eric was being practical,” said Rep. Tom Cole, an Oklahoma Republican.
“I think that both are very principled guys,” Cole said. “But obviously the majority leader is trying to move product and keep his troops together. And Jeb, I think, has always been the fiscal hawk first.”
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."