Kirsten Gillibrand Is Near Yet So Far on Assault Bill

The New York Democrat has majority support in the Senate — but not enough yet to get past a filibuster.

WASHINGTON, DC -: Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., is still asking for votes for her military sexual assault reform. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Feb. 27, 2014, 1:24 p.m.

Sen. Kirsten Gil­librand is look­ing for sen­at­ors who would al­low her mil­it­ary sexu­al-as­sault bill to pass even if they don’t vote for it dir­ectly.

The New York Demo­crat’s con­tro­ver­sial bill — which would take away com­mand­ers’ power to de­cide which sexu­al-as­sault cases are pro­sec­uted — has been gran­ted a vote by lead­ers of both parties and could come to the floor as soon as next week.

Gil­librand has 55 pub­licly de­clared sup­port­ers for her le­gis­la­tion, and if she could con­vince 60 mem­bers to vote yes on a pro­ced­ur­al vote to take up her bill, it could pass with a simple ma­jor­ity us­ing the votes she already has racked up.

A vic­tory for Gil­librand has been con­sidered a long shot and re­mains a chal­lenge, but there is a strategy in sight and she has already de­fied ex­pect­a­tions. She has man­aged to at­tract the sup­port from a ma­jor­ity of the Sen­ate, des­pite the Pentagon’s vo­ci­fer­ous ob­jec­tions and amid the op­pos­i­tion of Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee lead­ers.

Gil­librand’s bill has an un­usu­al co­ali­tion of some of the most mod­er­ate Re­pub­lic­ans like Sen. Susan Collins of Maine and some of the tea-party stars like Sens. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz. She has a ma­jor­ity of Demo­crats but is miss­ing the sup­port of some cru­cial Armed Ser­vices mem­bers such as Chair­man Carl Lev­in of Michigan and the com­mit­tee’s heir ap­par­ent, Jack Reed of Rhode Is­land.

One of the most out­spoken op­pon­ents of Gil­librand is fel­low Demo­crat Claire Mc­Caskill, who has been fight­ing Gil­librand’s le­gis­la­tion with a non­con­tro­ver­sial al­tern­at­ive that would al­low sexu­al-as­sault vic­tims to provide in­put in­to their pro­sec­u­tions and im­prove the ac­count­ab­il­ity of the com­mand­er, among oth­er pro­vi­sions.

Mc­Caskill is more seni­or than Gil­librand on Armed Ser­vices and has a long his­tory of work­ing to com­bat sexu­al as­sault, in­clud­ing dur­ing her pre­vi­ous ca­reer as a pro­sec­utor in Mis­souri spe­cial­iz­ing in such crimes. She has been us­ing her clout to lobby col­leagues hard to op­pose the Gil­librand bill.

Both the Gil­librand and Mc­Caskill bills have been prom­ised votes after be­ing stalled in the Sen­ate for months. Un­der the terms of an agree­ment reached between Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id and Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, they will re­ceive an ex­ped­ited de­bate and are ex­pec­ted to be up for votes some­time in March be­fore the next re­cess.

Gil­librand’s strategy is par­tic­u­larly tough since Mc­Caskill’s bill — which en­joys little if any op­pos­i­tion — would re­ceive its own pro­ced­ur­al vote, so there’s no way for Gil­librand to piggy­back off of the oth­er bill’s pop­ular­ity.

Gil­librand, who clearly has a ves­ted in­terest in chan­nel­ing mo­mentum, says she is con­fid­ent she can suc­ceed in find­ing 60 votes for clo­ture to pass her bill. “Yes, I think it will,” she said.

Some­times mem­bers are will­ing to vote yes to pro­ceed to a bill they don’t want to vote for, which Iowa Re­pub­lic­an Chuck Grass­ley says “is a way of hav­ing your cake and eat­ing it too.”

But those are usu­ally pretty rare cir­cum­stances on meas­ures mem­bers be­lieve must pass but do not want to at­tach their name to.

A re­cent ex­ample is the Sen­ate’s vote on the debt ceil­ing. Earli­er this month, 12 Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors joined Demo­crats on a cru­cial pro­ced­ur­al vote of 67-31 that en­sured the debt ceil­ing was raised, even though sen­at­ors ap­proved that meas­ure on a party line vote of only 55-43. But that vote held the na­tion’s bor­row­ing au­thor­ity in the bal­ance and its fail­ure could have caused mar­ket may­hem.

The strategy would not be an easy one to pull off, but even some Re­pub­lic­an op­pon­ents say it is feas­ible.

“It’s pos­sible be­cause she’s really worked hard on it, so I’d say maybe,” said GOP Sen. John Ho­even of North Dakota, who does not sup­port her bill. “But if not, the reas­on would be people want to have some time to see how some of the pro­vi­sions that were just en­acted work…. It’s too soon.”

It’s not clear that Gil­librand can make such a dy­nam­ic work to her ad­vant­age be­cause many mem­bers equate the vote on the pro­ced­ure with de­cid­ing a bill’s fate.

“Usu­ally mem­bers treat the clo­ture vote as the vote,” said Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Mike Crapo of Idaho.

Un­sur­pris­ingly, most mem­bers rate Gil­librand’s odds of suc­cess in line with their own in­terests, with sup­port­ers say­ing it is con­ceiv­able it could pass and op­pon­ents shoot­ing it down.

“I doubt it,” said Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Jeff Ses­sions of Alabama, who is op­posed to the bill. “The mil­it­ary fully un­der­stands the ser­i­ous­ness of the is­sue and is mak­ing many changes.”¦ The whole cul­ture of the mil­it­ary is that the com­mand­er is re­spons­ible for his unit, and when you bring in people out­side to be in­volved in dis­cip­line and lead­er­ship, you’ve eroded a clas­sic­al mil­it­ary prin­ciple that’s fun­da­ment­al.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4424) }}

What We're Following See More »
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
21 hours ago

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
2 days ago

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
2 days ago

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
2 days ago
California: It’s Not Over Yet
2 days ago

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.