The Republican Presidential Contender Everyone’s Overlooking

Ohio Gov. John Kasich is serious about running for president, and he’d be a formidable candidate.

US Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney (2nd L) waves alongside Ohio Republican Senator Rob Portman (L) and Ohio Governor John Kasich (R) during a campaign stop at Tom's Ice Cream Bowl in Zanesville, Ohio, on August 14, 2012.
National Journal
Josh Kraushaar
Jan. 29, 2014, midnight

For a party that’s ac­cus­tomed to nom­in­at­ing the next-in-line pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate, 2016 prom­ises to be a very un­usu­al year for the Re­pub­lic­an Party. For the first time in dec­ades, the GOP has no clear front-run­ner or even an es­tab­lish­ment fa­vor­ite at this early stage.

New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie looked poised to fill that role, but his home-state scan­dals are en­dan­ger­ing any na­tion­al bid be­fore it even gets un­der­way. Jeb Bush would be an ob­vi­ous con­tender, but Re­pub­lic­an of­fi­cials are skep­tic­al he’d jump in­to the ring — all too cog­niz­ant of the bag­gage his last name brings. Wis­con­sin Gov. Scott Walk­er might be able to tran­scend the gap between the tea party and the es­tab­lish­ment, but he still faces a chal­len­ging reelec­tion back home. Sen. Marco Ru­bio of Flor­ida lost some cachet after his high-pro­file ad­vocacy of im­mig­ra­tion re­form foundered.

But there’s one can­did­ate who isn’t gen­er­at­ing much buzz and whose résumé com­pares fa­vor­ably with any of the top-tier can­did­ates. He’s a battle­ground-state gov­ernor who’s look­ing in strong po­s­i­tion to win a second term. He de­feated one of the more pop­u­lar Demo­crat­ic gov­ernors in the coun­try, who happened to be a ma­jor Clin­ton ally. He’s from the Mid­w­est, likely to be the crit­ic­al re­gion in the 2016 pres­id­en­tial elec­tion. He entered of­fice as a prom­in­ent fisc­al con­ser­vat­ive but com­prom­ised on Medi­caid ex­pan­sion. And most im­port­ant, Re­pub­lic­an of­fi­cials fa­mil­i­ar with his think­ing say he’s ser­i­ously con­sid­er­ing a pres­id­en­tial cam­paign.

Enter Ohio Gov. John Kasich, the swing-state ex­ec­ut­ive who’s cur­rently polling at mi­cro­scop­ic levels na­tion­ally but who could have an out­sized im­pact on the 2016 race.

“The pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee is likely to be a gov­ernor, and, frankly, Kasich is as well situ­ated as any­body. This is a guy who can con­nect with a crowd, he can emote, he’s got blue-col­lar roots, and he iden­ti­fies with av­er­age folks. He’s cer­tainly no Rom­ney,” said former NR­CC Chair­man Tom Dav­is, who served with Kasich in Con­gress. “In my opin­ion, he’s the total pack­age. And I think he’s in­ter­ested.”

By all ac­counts, Kasich shouldn’t be con­sidered a sleep­er. As gov­ernor, he’s presided over a Rust Belt renais­sance, with the state’s un­em­ploy­ment rate drop­ping from one of the highest in the coun­try in 2009 (10.6 per­cent) to around the na­tion­al av­er­age (7.2 per­cent) last month. In 2013, Kasich signed a siz­able tax cut thanks to the state’s new­found budget sur­plus. Kasich was among the first Re­pub­lic­ans to tout the party’s need to reach out to the dis­ad­vant­aged, and he lived up to his rhet­or­ic by passing pris­on-sen­ten­cing re­form with sup­port from Afric­an-Amer­ic­an le­gis­lat­ors.

He ran for pres­id­ent be­fore in 2000, par­lay­ing his role passing four bal­anced budgets with Bill Clin­ton as a main selling point of the cam­paign. In ef­fect, he was Paul Ry­an be­fore Ry­an was elec­ted to Con­gress. But he barely made a dent in a year when George W. Bush se­cured early sup­port from party lead­ers.

“Mitt Rom­ney’s biggest prob­lem was the per­cep­tion he didn’t care — that’s a Re­pub­lic­an Achilles’ heel al­most built in­to the party,” said former Bush press sec­ret­ary Ari Fleis­cher. “It would be con­struct­ive to have a can­did­ate who could di­min­ish that gap be­cause they’re cut from a dif­fer­ent cloth, they have a proven track re­cord of help­ing the poor and middle-class, and their policies show it. For people like John Kasich, he feels it as a so­cial call­ing. That has the po­ten­tial to be at­tract­ive so long as it’s matched with con­ser­vat­ive ideo­logy.”

In­deed, Kasich’s gov­ern­ing mes­sage in Ohio sounds aw­fully sim­il­ar to the “com­pas­sion­ate con­ser­vat­ive” brand that Bush him­self em­ployed so suc­cess­fully in 2000. Last Au­gust, Kasich told The Wall Street Journ­al: “I have a chance to show what it means to be suc­cess­ful eco­nom­ic­ally, but also to have a com­pas­sion­ate side, a caring side, to help lift people up.”

Kasich’s nar­row gubernat­ori­al vic­tory in 2010 was also not­able for the co­ali­tion he built to vic­tory: He was one of the rare Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates who per­formed bet­ter with up­scale voters than the work­ing-class whites who make up the GOP’s base. Among col­lege-edu­cated whites, Kasich won a re­mark­able 63 per­cent of the vote, while non­col­lege whites backed him with 54 per­cent. Demo­crats at­tacked him for his wealth and his role as man­aging dir­ect­or for Leh­man Broth­ers be­fore the re­ces­sion, but the pop­u­list at­tacks back­fired among the state’s ma­na­geri­al class. Like Christie, Kasich could be well-po­si­tioned to win a second term by rack­ing up un­usu­ally high sup­port from tra­di­tion­ally Demo­crat­ic con­stitu­en­cies. A Novem­ber Quin­nipi­ac sur­vey showed his job-ap­prov­al rat­ing at a healthy 52 per­cent, with the gov­ernor win­ning top marks from 32 per­cent of Demo­crats, 33 per­cent of Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans, and 49 per­cent of young (18-29) voters. He’s main­tained his ap­peal with col­lege-edu­cated Ohioans, with 55 per­cent ap­prov­ing.

“He’s reached out to the Afric­an-Amer­ic­an com­munity, and has pro­moted a few is­sues the black com­munity cares about — like Medi­caid [ex­pan­sion] and the pris­on is­sue,” said Colum­bus may­or Mi­chael Cole­man, a Demo­crat. “The ques­tion be­comes are they go­ing to come out for his op­pon­ent. His op­pon­ent will have to work the black com­munity and show sup­port for is­sues that the black com­munity sup­ports.”

This year, Kasich will be fa­cing a well-re­garded Demo­crat­ic op­pon­ent — Cuyahoga County Ex­ec­ut­ive Ed FitzGer­ald — and he’s far from a shoo-in. But a re­sound­ing second-term vic­tory would be more im­press­ive than Christie’s land­slide win, giv­en that he’s fa­cing a chal­lenger who’s get­ting sup­port and fin­an­cial help from the na­tion­al party.

To be sure, Kasich has his vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies with the base. He’d be one of the few Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernors to em­brace Medi­caid ex­pan­sion in his home state, a stick­ing point for many con­ser­vat­ives. After un­suc­cess­fully try­ing to lim­it col­lect­ive-bar­gain­ing rights, he’s smoothed over re­la­tions with uni­ons. As a con­gress­man, he backed the Clin­ton as­sault-weapons ban in the 1990s, even though he now be­lieves it wasn’t very ef­fect­ive.

Some skep­tics view Kasich as too un­dis­cip­lined for the rig­or of a pres­id­en­tial cam­paign. There’s a boat­load of foot­age for op­pos­i­tion re­search­ers to pore through, from when he guest-hos­ted The O’Re­illy Factor and hos­ted his own week­end show on Fox News a dec­ade ago.

But he’s also got a tail­or-made nar­rat­ive for a pres­id­en­tial cam­paign: He’s an eco­nom­ic turn­around spe­cial­ist who helped bal­ance four budgets in Con­gress and turned around his state’s strug­gling fisc­al situ­ation in three years. Christie re­ceived out­sized na­tion­al at­ten­tion gov­ern­ing next to the me­dia cap­it­al of the world, but Ohio is a more pop­u­lous, elect­or­ally-sig­ni­fic­ant state.

“Kasich holds the co­ali­tion to­geth­er,” Dav­is said. “You take a look at the states in play, and Ohio is a must. No Re­pub­lic­an has been elec­ted pres­id­ent without win­ning Ohio.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4695) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×