Conspiracy Theorists’ Favorite Lab Is Moving to Kansas

The biological research facility at Plum Island, thought by some to have propagated Lyme disease, is relocating at a cost of more than $1 billion.

There have been many stories told about the facility on Plum Island over the years. Now, it is moving to Kansas.
National Journal
Billy House
Jan. 29, 2014, 11:42 a.m.

The stor­ies about Plum Is­land, an un­re­mark­able 3-mile strip off the coast of Long Is­land that has long played home to the Plum Is­land An­im­al Dis­ease Cen­ter, are the stuff of com­ic books and hor­ror movies.

Dur­ing the cold war, folks said it was home to a secret bio­lo­gic­al weapons pro­gram in­volving a former Nazi sci­ent­ist. Years later, it was blamed for the spread of Lyme dis­ease (which was named for a town in nearby Con­necti­c­ut). The lat­ter claim was so per­sist­ent that the De­part­ment of Home­land Se­cur­ity still re­futes it on its web­site.

Plum Is­land has also been the set­ting for a nov­el and the sub­ject of the TV show Con­spir­acy The­ory With Jesse Ven­tura, and it even got a shout-out from fic­tion­al bo­gey­man Han­ni­bal Lecter in The Si­lence of the Lambs. “Sounds charm­ing,” he said of the place.

Now, the gov­ern­ment is spend­ing more than $1 bil­lion to move the lab, which stud­ies swine flu, foot-and-mouth dis­ease, and oth­er live­stock ail­ments, from New York to Man­hat­tan, Kan. — and the talk is start­ing again.

The pro­ject, which re­ceived $404 mil­lion in the latest ap­pro­pri­ations bill, has al­tern­ately been de­scribed as a vi­tal gov­ern­ment pri­or­ity, an “ear­mark­ish” piece of pork, an eco­nom­ic boost to the loc­als, and a bio­lo­gic­al danger to a rur­al com­munity, de­pend­ing on who is do­ing the talk­ing. It’s a ster­ling re­mind­er that there is more than one way to view a gov­ern­ment ex­pendit­ure.

As elec­ted of­fi­cials from Kan­sas tell it, mov­ing what is now called the Na­tion­al Bio and Agro-De­fense Fa­cil­ity from the 843-acre, off-lim­its cam­pus on Plum Is­land to a site ad­ja­cent to Kan­sas State Uni­versity rep­res­ents a huge eco­nom­ic vic­tory.

“This in­vest­ment means Kan­sas will be­come a re­search epi­cen­ter, and the con­struc­tion of this mod­ern, world-class fa­cil­ity will ul­ti­mately cre­ate jobs for Kansans in the fields of en­gin­eer­ing, sci­ence and tech­no­logy,” crowed Sen. Jerry Mor­an in a re­lease after the fund­ing was ap­pro­pri­ated.

A re­port in 2012 es­tim­ated that the new lab will have roughly 326 per­man­ent em­ploy­ees and sup­port some 757 con­struc­tion jobs, and that the fa­cil­ity is ex­pec­ted to have a $3.5 bil­lion eco­nom­ic im­pact on Kan­sas in the first 20 years alone. The state has also com­mit­ted to this pro­ject by con­trib­ut­ing $202 mil­lion.

“Many mem­bers of the Kan­sas Con­gres­sion­al del­eg­a­tion have worked tire­lessly on this for many years,” Kan­sas Gov. Sam Brown­back said in a re­lease.

But not every­one is smil­ing.

For those who op­pose the re­lo­ca­tion, news of the fund­ing rep­res­en­ted the in­ev­it­ab­il­ity that one of the world’s largest “germ labs,” as they de­scribe it, will be loc­ated in their com­munity, in the heart of cattle and ag­ri­cul­tur­al land.

Bill Dor­sett, of the group No NBAF in Kan­sas, said Monday that the fund­ing was not ne­ces­sar­ily a sur­prise, but it was a “dis­ap­point­ment.” He said he and oth­er op­pon­ents still con­tend re­search on deadly an­im­al patho­gens should re­main in isol­a­tion, prefer­ably on an is­land off the main­land — like the one the lab sat upon for roughly 60 years.

An­oth­er act­iv­ist, Thomas Man­ney, a pro­fess­or emer­it­us from KSU’s de­part­ment of phys­ics and di­vi­sion of bio­logy, raised con­cerns that the loc­a­tion of the lab will put it in­side “tor­nado al­ley.”

“Around here, the uni­versity sci­ent­ists and ad­min­is­trat­ors are gen­er­ally viewed in very high re­gard, so when they tell poli­cy­makers and the press that it is safe and im­port­ant, they are per­suas­ive,” Man­ney said. But he ad­ded, “Pub­lic ex­pres­sion of dis­sent by sci­ent­ists who are will­ing to speak out has been ef­fect­ively dis­cour­aged by the uni­versity. Most have not been will­ing.”

In­deed, the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion ac­know­ledged in 2008 there have been ac­ci­dents at the fa­cil­ity, in­clud­ing one in 1978 in­volving the re­lease of highly con­ta­gious foot-and-mouth dis­ease in­to cattle-hold­ing pens on Plum Is­land. As a res­ult, the lab in­sti­tuted more strin­gent bio-con­tain­ment meas­ures.

The lab is also a po­ten­tial ter­ror­ism tar­get. Plum Is­land was on a list of tar­gets found when a Mas­sachu­setts In­sti­tute of Tech­no­logy gradu­ate work­ing as a sci­ent­ist for al-Qaida was cap­tured in Afgh­anistan in 2008.

Yet when the gov­ern­ment an­nounced that a new state-of the-art fa­cil­ity would be built to re­place the aging lab on Plum Is­land, many loc­ales jumped to com­pete. Kan­sas was se­lec­ted after a three-year pro­cess that began in 2006 with 29 sites com­pet­ing.

Today, the lab is de­pic­ted by gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials as a vi­tal cog in the na­tion’s war on bi­o­ter­ror, and Home­land Se­cur­ity says the re­lo­ca­tion pro­cess in­cluded as­sess­ments of the en­vir­on­ment­al and se­cur­ity risks in­volved.

“The main labor­at­ory will boast safety and se­cur­ity fea­tures re­com­men­ded by the Na­tion­al Academies of Sci­ences,” Mor­an said in his re­lease. “It will in­clude spe­cial­ized air and wa­ter de­con­tam­in­a­tion sys­tems, new tech­no­lo­gies for hand­ling sol­id waste onsite, and struc­tur­al com­pon­ents to strengthen the labor­at­ory against haz­ard­ous weath­er con­di­tions.”

Back in Wash­ing­ton, it wasn’t the germs that caused some to be con­cerned. It was the money. Steve El­lis, vice pres­id­ent of Tax­pay­ers for Com­mon Sense, cited the $404 mil­lion for the pro­ject as an “ear­mark­ish and ear­mark-esque” pro­vi­sion in the ap­pro­pri­ations bill.

But Gar­rette Sil­ver­man, a spokes­wo­man for Mor­an, coun­ters that the pro­ject “is about as far from an ear­mark as you can get.” It is a DHS pri­or­ity, she said, and has been sup­por­ted by two ad­min­is­tra­tions as vi­tal to ad­dress­ing bio­lo­gic­al threats.

“Kan­sas was un­an­im­ously se­lec­ted on its mer­its as the best loc­a­tion for NBAF by a se­lect pan­el of sci­ent­ists and ex­perts from DHS and the U.S. De­part­ment of Ag­ri­cul­ture,” she said.

For now, the fisc­al fights in Wash­ing­ton may have slowed the pace of ac­tu­al con­struc­tion. Pres­id­ent Obama ori­gin­ally pro­posed spend­ing $714 mil­lion in 2014, but only $404 mil­lion was ap­pro­pri­ated. That plus earli­er fed­er­al ex­pendit­ures and state money amount to about two thirds of the total cost of the pro­ject. An of­fi­cial ground­break­ing has already been held, and com­ple­tion is ex­pec­ted in 2018.

Whatever the ar­gu­ments, the lab is head­ing to Kan­sas.

What We're Following See More »
“CLINTON MUST BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT”
Bernie Sanders Seeks to Unite the Party
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Instead of his usual stump speech, Bernie Sanders tonight threw his support behind Hillary Clinton, providing a clear contrast between Clinton and GOP nominee Donald Trump on the many issues he used to discuss in his campaign stump speeches. Sanders spoke glowingly about the presumptive Democratic nominee, lauding her work as first lady and as a strong advocate for women and the poor. “We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor,” he said. “Hillary Clinton will make a great president, and I am proud to stand with her tonight."

“MUST NEVER BE PRESIDENT”
Elizabeth Warren Goes After Donald Trump
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.

FLOTUS OFFERS STRONG ENDORSEMENT OF CLINTON
Michelle Obama: “I Trust” Hillary Clinton
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"In this election, and every election, it's about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives," Michelle Obama said. "There is only one person who I trust with that responsibility … and that is our friend Hillary Clinton." In a personal and emotional speech, Michelle Obama spoke about the effect that angry oppositional rhetoric had on her children and how she chose to raise them. "When they go low, we go high," Obama said she told her children about dealing with bullies. Obama stayed mostly positive, but still offered a firm rebuke of Donald Trump, despite never once uttering his name. "The issues a president faces cannot be boiled down to 140 characters," she said.

SANDERS BACKER CONFRONTS STUBBORN SANDERS SUPPORTERS
Sarah Silverman to Bernie or Bust: “You’re Being Ridiculous”
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Many Bernie Sanders delegates have spent much of the first day of the Democratic National Convention resisting unity, booing at mentions of Hillary Clinton and often chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" Well, one of the most outspoken Bernie Sanders supporters just told them to take a seat. "To the Bernie-or-bust people: You're being ridiculous," said comedian Sarah Silverman in a brief appearance at the Convention, minutes after saying that she would proudly support Hillary Clinton for president.

‘INEXCUSABLE REMARKS’
DNC Formally Apologizes to Bernie Sanders
15 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Democratic National Committee issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders today, after leaked emails showed staffers trying to sabotage his presidential bid. "On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email," DNC officials said in the statement. "These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not—and will not—tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates."

Source:
×