Fallout From the ‘Me Generation’ Fuels Crisis in Congress

“It’s all about me” is the mantra, and America — along with its politics — is the lesser for it.

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 27: U.S. Rep. John Dingell (D-MI) participates in a news conference and rally to mark the 46th anniversary of the passage of Medicare in the U.S. Capitol Visitors Center July 27, 2011 in Washington, DC. The longest currently-serving member of Congress, Dingell wielded the gavel during that historic session of the House of Representatives in 1965.
National Journal
Charlie Cook
Dec. 16, 2013, 4:09 p.m.

You hear myri­ad ex­plan­a­tions for why the Amer­ic­an polit­ic­al pro­cess — par­tic­u­larly Wash­ing­ton and, most spe­cific­ally, Con­gress — has be­come barely func­tion­al, if that.

The loss of com­munity caused by law­makers’ ef­fect­ively ad­opt­ing a three-day work week is one reas­on. Un­like the old days, when most con­gres­sion­al fam­il­ies lived in the Wash­ing­ton area for most of the year — usu­ally spend­ing the school year here — mem­bers and spouses no longer get to know each oth­er so­cially. Mem­bers used to see each oth­er reg­u­larly at PTA meet­ings, soc­cer matches, and back­yard bar­be­cues, provid­ing op­por­tun­it­ies for those of dif­fer­ent parties and ideo­lo­gies to mingle in non­com­bat­ive set­tings.

In the old days, many mem­bers fre­quently traveled abroad on con­gres­sion­al del­eg­a­tion trips to see U.S. mil­it­ary in­stall­a­tions and meet with for­eign of­fi­cials. These trips not only ex­pan­ded their know­ledge and ho­ri­zons but also offered chances for mem­bers to get to know one an­oth­er bet­ter. Back when House mem­bers were re­im­bursed for only a few trips back to their dis­tricts, some mem­bers — in­clud­ing two young House mem­bers from Illinois, Bob Michel and Danny Ros­ten­kowski — would car­pool with an­oth­er mem­ber or two back and forth. Michel, a Re­pub­lic­an, would be­come the House minor­ity lead­er; Rosty, a Demo­crat, would later chair the Ways and Means Com­mit­tee.

The in­creas­ingly bit­ter nature of today’s polit­ic­al cam­paigns, with of­ten vi­cious neg­at­ive ads, causes newly elec­ted or reelec­ted mem­bers to hate not just their elec­tion op­pon­ent, but also any­one wear­ing the same colored jer­sey: guilt by as­so­ci­ation. Op­pos­i­tion re­search, which was lim­ited to search­ing through the stacks of pub­lic lib­rar­ies 40 years ago, has now ef­fect­ively giv­en way to private in­vest­ig­at­ors. For ex­ample, a pair of re­tired FBI agents re­cently was de­tailed to vis­it one state cap­it­al to dig up dirt on a po­ten­tial Sen­ate can­did­ate.

The heightened par­tis­an and ideo­lo­gic­al en­vir­on­ment cer­tainly af­fects the polit­ic­al sys­tem’s abil­ity to func­tion as in­ten­ded.

But maybe we all have changed. Think about the Amer­ic­ans, can­did­ates, and elec­ted of­fi­cials whose life ex­per­i­ences and out­look were shaped dur­ing the Great De­pres­sion and World War II. The coun­try went through a shared ex­per­i­ence of roughly 15 years of hard­ship and of­ten depriva­tion. Then came the war; vir­tu­ally every Amer­ic­an fam­ily was called to sac­ri­fice, many through mil­it­ary ser­vice, with most fam­il­ies con­trib­ut­ing fath­ers or sons, some­times wives and daugh­ters. Oth­ers helped the war ef­fort through their work in factor­ies; even chil­dren col­lec­ted tin cans and rub­ber tires for re­cyc­ling. It was a time when all were asked to do their part for the war ef­fort. Fam­il­ies were is­sued ra­tion books for meat, gas­ol­ine, and tires. This was not so­cial­ist­ic or com­mun­ist­ic, but rather a col­lect­ive and uni­fy­ing ac­tion, a shared sac­ri­fice, with each do­ing his or her part for the com­mon good. Tom Brokaw dubbed these Amer­ic­ans the “Greatest Gen­er­a­tion,” and few quibble with that char­ac­ter­iz­a­tion. Every­one learned to work to­geth­er and forge com­prom­ises, be­cause that’s what was ne­ces­sary in those times.

Then came my gen­er­a­tion, the baby boomers, fol­lowed by Gen­er­a­tions X and Y (it is too soon to blame the mil­len­ni­al gen­er­a­tion for any­thing yet), and the fo­cus shif­ted from the col­lect­ive good to the in­di­vidu­al be­ne­fit. For my own and sub­sequent gen­er­a­tions, “It’s all about me” be­came an ac­cur­ate descriptor, along with “Do your own thing,” “Go your own way,” and “If it feels good, do it.”

Every kid gets a trophy, and in­stead of eight or 10 ra­dio sta­tions with all teen­agers listen­ing to the same Top 40 rock sta­tion, every­one has his or her own playl­ist. If you are a lib­er­al, you watch, listen, or read cer­tain cable net­works, web­sites, and magazines. If you are con­ser­vat­ive, you have a dif­fer­ent set of me­dia sources, with talk ra­dio ad­ded for good meas­ure. When our na­tion has to go to war, few are asked to sac­ri­fice. Many don’t even know we still have troops in harm’s way, be­cause they don’t know any­one who is serving or has served in the mil­it­ary.

A vis­it to the World War II and Vi­et­nam War me­mori­als demon­strates the dif­fer­ences between the Greatest Gen­er­a­tion and those that fol­lowed. The former fo­cuses on the battles that our sol­diers, sail­ors, and air­men fought, the lat­ter on the in­di­vidu­als who gave up their lives — one em­phas­izes the col­lect­ive, the oth­er the in­di­vidu­al. Even though it seems that the vet­er­ans of Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan have been treated much bet­ter than those re­turn­ing from Korea and Vi­et­nam — who were of­ten either ig­nored or spat upon — the col­lect­ive sen­ti­ment of the phrase, “All gave some, but some gave all” doesn’t really seem to res­on­ate any­more.

Sept. 11, 2001, was ini­tially an in­cred­ibly uni­fy­ing event, but soon the con­tro­versy over wheth­er to at­tack Ir­aq re­drew the old ideo­lo­gic­al bound­ary lines. A dozen years later, many of today’s voters and elec­ted of­fi­cials — in both parties and at both ends of the ideo­lo­gic­al spec­trum — seem to have lost that sense of unity, sac­ri­fice, and, yes, com­prom­ise. This loss clearly shows in our polit­ics. “It’s all about me” is the man­tra, even if my ac­tions hurt the com­mon good. Maybe the cur­rent chaot­ic, and some­times al­most an­arch­ic, be­ha­vi­or of our lead­ers is par­tially a res­ult of the life ex­per­i­ences of the past sev­er­al gen­er­a­tions. The men­tal­ity of post-Greatest Gen­er­a­tion Amer­ic­ans flows from the way they (my gen­er­a­tion in­cluded) have been raised. And Amer­ica is the less­er for it.

The ven­er­able Rep. John Din­gell of Michigan, who served in the Army dur­ing World War II, is the last re­main­ing Greatest Gen­er­a­tion mem­ber serving in Con­gress. Din­gell is someone from the old school if there ever was one, and hear­ing him talk about the change in con­gres­sion­al polit­ics is a grim re­mind­er of how things have de­teri­or­ated.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4627) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×