Democrats Doubt Republicans Will Change Their Spots

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 16: U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) speaks during a news conference January 16, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. House Democrats held a news conference to announce new legislation to eliminate the federal debt ceiling.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
Dec. 12, 2013, 2:46 p.m.

Some gasped when House Speak­er John Boehner dressed down con­ser­vat­ive groups this week as hav­ing “lost all cred­ib­il­ity.” But Demo­crats were skep­tic­al that Boehner’s com­ments — and his will­ing­ness to al­low a quick vote on a budget deal that out­side groups hate — rep­res­ent a turn­ing point for Re­pub­lic­ans.

Con­gres­sion­al Pro­gress­ive Caucus Co­chair Keith El­lis­on, D-Minn., said Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship push­ing back against out­side con­ser­vat­ive groups is “a pos­it­ive sign, but I don’t think it’s any­thing more than a mo­ment­ary sign.”

“That’s be­cause these far-right groups are not go­ing to quit,” El­lis­on said. “They’re go­ing to re­cal­cu­late and come back at it ASAP, and one nev­er knows what these Re­pub­lic­ans in this Con­gress are go­ing to do the next time a big is­sue comes up. We’ve got the debt ceil­ing com­ing up.”

Demo­crats are cer­tainly pleased that they didn’t see Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship giv­ing in to pres­sure from out­side groups on the budget deal, but by and large, they don’t view how the budget deal came to­geth­er as the dawn of a brand-new day.

“I was en­cour­aged by what [Boehner] had to say, and we’ll see what hap­pens today,” House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi said be­fore the budget deal hit the House floor for a vote. As for wheth­er a new spir­it of bi­par­tis­an­ship is sweep­ing the Cap­it­ol, Pelosi said, “I don’t think it’s a one-off, and I don’t think it’s a turn­ing point.”

Sen. Chuck Schu­mer, the No. 3 Demo­crat in the Sen­ate, soun­ded the most op­tim­ist­ic that the budget deal rep­res­en­ted something lar­ger. He cited pas­sage of com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form, the farm bill, and oth­er le­gis­la­tion in the Sen­ate with a num­ber of Re­pub­lic­an sup­port­ers as a good sign, and he de­pic­ted bi­par­tis­an­ship as something akin to a vir­us that he hopes will spread through both cham­bers.

“The House has al­ways been the block, and now the House seems to be catch­ing the let’s-get-it-done fever that has in­fec­ted a good num­ber of Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans for the bet­ter,” Schu­mer said. “I hope that it’s a con­di­tion that re­mains with them for many, many months to come.”

The debt ceil­ing, which will have to be re­newed next year, will be an early test as to wheth­er a con­sid­er­able block of Re­pub­lic­ans will re­buke pres­sure from out­side con­ser­vat­ive groups, said House Budget Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Chris Van Hol­len of Mary­land. Many of his fel­low Demo­crats are ask­ing them­selves wheth­er the in­flu­ence of such groups has waned enough to al­low ba­sic budget­ary bills to get through without a fight.

“If our Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues go home and they don’t get a lot of push­back, maybe that will en­cour­age them to co­oper­ate more on oth­er is­sues. I will only be­lieve it when I see it,” Van Hol­len said. “I don’t see any evid­ence that they’re go­ing to stop their knee-jerk al­le­gi­ance to Grover Nor­quist’s plan. I don’t see that.”

Con­ser­vat­ive group Her­it­age Ac­tion an­nounced its op­pos­i­tion to the budget deal be­fore it was form­ally an­nounced — and un­sur­pris­ingly key-voted it a “no.”

Liber­tari­an-aligned Cato In­sti­tute is op­posed, and Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity called the deal not just “bad policy, it is bad polit­ics.”

Demo­crats, and par­tic­u­larly pro­gress­ives, aren’t thrilled with the fi­nal budget deal either, which helps ex­plain their lack of ela­tion over the Re­pub­lic­an polit­ics of it. The deal lacks an ex­ten­sion of long-term un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance, asks fed­er­al em­ploy­ees to pay in more to their pen­sions, and lacks oth­er Demo­crat­ic pri­or­it­ies. Left-lean­ing Demo­cracy for Amer­ica re­ferred to it not as a com­prom­ise, but as “a sel­lout.”

And both sides pre­dict this Con­gress will con­tin­ue with the same polit­ics as usu­al for the fore­see­able fu­ture.

Rep. Tim Huel­skamp, R-Kan., a tea-party-aligned mem­ber of­ten seen as a thorn in lead­er­ship’s side, said out­side groups, wheth­er lib­er­al or con­ser­vat­ive, should have con­sid­er­able in­flu­ence on Cap­it­ol Hill. And he sees re­per­cus­sions down the road for think­ing oth­er­wise.

“When those con­ser­vat­ive groups say there’s a prob­lem in Wash­ing­ton, they get tens of thou­sands of people to call in. It’s not fake,” he said. “For any Re­pub­lic­an to try and ig­nore them is dan­ger­ous to them elect­or­ally. That doesn’t both­er the speak­er — I think he’s go­ing to re­tire. But for plenty of oth­ers? They’re look­ing over their shoulders, be­cause these are ef­fect­ive groups.”

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
16 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
42 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×