Democrats Doubt Republicans Will Change Their Spots

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 16: U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) speaks during a news conference January 16, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. House Democrats held a news conference to announce new legislation to eliminate the federal debt ceiling.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
Dec. 12, 2013, 2:46 p.m.

Some gasped when House Speak­er John Boehner dressed down con­ser­vat­ive groups this week as hav­ing “lost all cred­ib­il­ity.” But Demo­crats were skep­tic­al that Boehner’s com­ments — and his will­ing­ness to al­low a quick vote on a budget deal that out­side groups hate — rep­res­ent a turn­ing point for Re­pub­lic­ans.

Con­gres­sion­al Pro­gress­ive Caucus Co­chair Keith El­lis­on, D-Minn., said Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship push­ing back against out­side con­ser­vat­ive groups is “a pos­it­ive sign, but I don’t think it’s any­thing more than a mo­ment­ary sign.”

“That’s be­cause these far-right groups are not go­ing to quit,” El­lis­on said. “They’re go­ing to re­cal­cu­late and come back at it ASAP, and one nev­er knows what these Re­pub­lic­ans in this Con­gress are go­ing to do the next time a big is­sue comes up. We’ve got the debt ceil­ing com­ing up.”

Demo­crats are cer­tainly pleased that they didn’t see Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship giv­ing in to pres­sure from out­side groups on the budget deal, but by and large, they don’t view how the budget deal came to­geth­er as the dawn of a brand-new day.

“I was en­cour­aged by what [Boehner] had to say, and we’ll see what hap­pens today,” House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi said be­fore the budget deal hit the House floor for a vote. As for wheth­er a new spir­it of bi­par­tis­an­ship is sweep­ing the Cap­it­ol, Pelosi said, “I don’t think it’s a one-off, and I don’t think it’s a turn­ing point.”

Sen. Chuck Schu­mer, the No. 3 Demo­crat in the Sen­ate, soun­ded the most op­tim­ist­ic that the budget deal rep­res­en­ted something lar­ger. He cited pas­sage of com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form, the farm bill, and oth­er le­gis­la­tion in the Sen­ate with a num­ber of Re­pub­lic­an sup­port­ers as a good sign, and he de­pic­ted bi­par­tis­an­ship as something akin to a vir­us that he hopes will spread through both cham­bers.

“The House has al­ways been the block, and now the House seems to be catch­ing the let’s-get-it-done fever that has in­fec­ted a good num­ber of Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans for the bet­ter,” Schu­mer said. “I hope that it’s a con­di­tion that re­mains with them for many, many months to come.”

The debt ceil­ing, which will have to be re­newed next year, will be an early test as to wheth­er a con­sid­er­able block of Re­pub­lic­ans will re­buke pres­sure from out­side con­ser­vat­ive groups, said House Budget Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Chris Van Hol­len of Mary­land. Many of his fel­low Demo­crats are ask­ing them­selves wheth­er the in­flu­ence of such groups has waned enough to al­low ba­sic budget­ary bills to get through without a fight.

“If our Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues go home and they don’t get a lot of push­back, maybe that will en­cour­age them to co­oper­ate more on oth­er is­sues. I will only be­lieve it when I see it,” Van Hol­len said. “I don’t see any evid­ence that they’re go­ing to stop their knee-jerk al­le­gi­ance to Grover Nor­quist’s plan. I don’t see that.”

Con­ser­vat­ive group Her­it­age Ac­tion an­nounced its op­pos­i­tion to the budget deal be­fore it was form­ally an­nounced — and un­sur­pris­ingly key-voted it a “no.”

Liber­tari­an-aligned Cato In­sti­tute is op­posed, and Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity called the deal not just “bad policy, it is bad polit­ics.”

Demo­crats, and par­tic­u­larly pro­gress­ives, aren’t thrilled with the fi­nal budget deal either, which helps ex­plain their lack of ela­tion over the Re­pub­lic­an polit­ics of it. The deal lacks an ex­ten­sion of long-term un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance, asks fed­er­al em­ploy­ees to pay in more to their pen­sions, and lacks oth­er Demo­crat­ic pri­or­it­ies. Left-lean­ing Demo­cracy for Amer­ica re­ferred to it not as a com­prom­ise, but as “a sel­lout.”

And both sides pre­dict this Con­gress will con­tin­ue with the same polit­ics as usu­al for the fore­see­able fu­ture.

Rep. Tim Huel­skamp, R-Kan., a tea-party-aligned mem­ber of­ten seen as a thorn in lead­er­ship’s side, said out­side groups, wheth­er lib­er­al or con­ser­vat­ive, should have con­sid­er­able in­flu­ence on Cap­it­ol Hill. And he sees re­per­cus­sions down the road for think­ing oth­er­wise.

“When those con­ser­vat­ive groups say there’s a prob­lem in Wash­ing­ton, they get tens of thou­sands of people to call in. It’s not fake,” he said. “For any Re­pub­lic­an to try and ig­nore them is dan­ger­ous to them elect­or­ally. That doesn’t both­er the speak­er — I think he’s go­ing to re­tire. But for plenty of oth­ers? They’re look­ing over their shoulders, be­cause these are ef­fect­ive groups.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
35 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×