Poll: End Workplace Discrimination Against Gays

NEW YORK, NY - NOVEMBER 18: Members and supporters of the Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender (LGBT) community protest United States-based economic trading with Russian-oriented companies outside the New York Stock Exchange on November 18, 2013 in New York City. Russia passed anti-LGBT-friendly laws over the summer, including laws that effectively make any pro-LGBT statements or demonstrations illegal. (Photo by Andrew Burton/Getty Images)
National Journal
Alex Roarty
Dec. 10, 2013, 5:15 p.m.

A strong ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans say they sup­port the Em­ploy­ment Non-Dis­crim­in­a­tion Act, le­gis­la­tion that would ban most private busi­nesses from work­place dis­crim­in­a­tion based on sexu­al ori­ent­a­tion or gender iden­tity, ac­cord­ing to the latest United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll. A plur­al­ity of Re­pub­lic­ans dis­sent, the sur­vey found, but their ob­jec­tions fade if the meas­ure ap­plied only to sexu­al ori­ent­a­tion.

The num­bers un­der­score the de­gree to which pub­lic opin­ion has swung in fa­vor of ex­pand­ing gay rights, even if sup­port lags for trans­gender men and wo­men. And they demon­strate the pre­dic­a­ment fa­cing Re­pub­lic­ans, who more of­ten than not now find them­selves on the los­ing end of the cul­ture war. Like im­mig­ra­tion, some types of gun con­trol, and — in­creas­ingly — gay mar­riage, the GOP op­poses le­gis­la­tion that draws sup­port from a ma­jor­ity of the coun­try.

In Novem­ber, 10 Re­pub­lic­ans joined with Demo­crats to ap­prove ENDA in the Sen­ate. But the GOP-con­trolled House has shelved the le­gis­la­tion, and there’s little hope among its sup­port­ers that it will re­ceive a vote on the floor.

In the poll, re­spond­ents were told the Sen­ate had passed le­gis­la­tion that sup­port­ers “say is ne­ces­sary to en­sure that all work­ers are treated equally wheth­er they are het­ero­sexu­al or ho­mo­sexu­al,” while op­pon­ents “say it will lead to un­ne­ces­sary law­suits and im­pinge on re­li­gious free­dom.” They were then asked if they sup­por­ted the meas­ure and if it should in­clude trans­gender people.

Fifty-six per­cent of those sur­veyed said they would sup­port a meas­ure pro­tect­ing both groups; 28 per­cent op­pose it out­right. An­oth­er 9 per­cent fell in between. They sup­por­ted the le­gis­la­tion if it pro­tec­ted only gay men and wo­men and not trans­gender people.

That pat­tern held across most edu­ca­tion­al, gender, and ra­cial lines: Sup­port for in­clud­ing trans­gender pro­tec­tions lagged roughly 10 points be­hind those for sexu­al ori­ent­a­tion. Among Demo­crats, for ex­ample, 75 per­cent favored a meas­ure that in­cluded only sexu­al ori­ent­a­tion, while just 65 per­cent sup­por­ted one for gay and trans­gender people.

The gap will frus­trate trans­gender ad­voc­ates, but they should also find reas­on for op­tim­ism. They don’t have as much pub­lic sup­port as the gay-rights move­ment, whose high-pro­file fight over gay mar­riage is known to most every­one in the coun­try. But sup­port for trans­gender men and wo­men ap­pears to have grown just as it has for causes like gay mar­riage — so much so that after be­ing stripped from a 2007 ver­sion of the ENDA, trans­gender pro­tec­tions were in­cluded in the cur­rent it­in­er­a­tion that passed the Sen­ate on Nov. 7.

Re­pub­lic­ans, however, have less reas­on to smile. In ad­di­tion to an over­all ma­jor­ity, sup­port for ENDA cuts across most demo­graph­ic groups. And it even draws sig­ni­fic­ant sup­port from rank-and-file GOP voters, 43 per­cent of whom sup­port the le­gis­la­tion. A plur­al­ity — 49 per­cent — op­pose it, but the num­bers flip if only sexu­al ori­ent­a­tion is pro­tec­ted. In that case, 53 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans would back ENDA, while 40 per­cent wouldn’t.

The strong pub­lic sup­port comes nearly a year after the GOP vowed to broaden its ap­peal by, in part, dis­tan­cing it­self from cri­ti­cism that its agenda is dis­crim­in­at­ory. Few voters will pick their can­did­ate based on sup­port or op­pos­i­tion to a re­l­at­ively minor is­sue like ENDA, but it — along with the party’s much high­er-pro­file con­tin­ued op­pos­i­tion to gay mar­riage — squeezes its abil­ity to at­tract grow­ing parts of the Amer­ic­an elect­or­ate like young people, minor­it­ies, and white pro­fes­sion­als. United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll show­ing that a ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans sup­port le­gis­la­tion to bar em­ploy­ers from treat­ing work­ers dif­fer­ently due to their sexu­al ori­ent­a­tion.

It’s why some Re­pub­lic­an op­er­at­ives are adam­ant the party needs to em­brace the le­gis­la­tion. “Sup­port for ENDA should be a no-brain­er: An over­whelm­ing num­ber of Amer­ic­ans be­lieve Con­gress should pass this bill,” said Alex Lun­dry, a strategist who has worked to per­suade his party to sup­port the le­gis­la­tion and gay mar­riage. “Re­gard­less of where Re­pub­lic­ans are on gay mar­riage, there is ma­jor­ity agree­ment among the party’s voters that no one be dis­crim­in­ated against in the work­place.”

More edu­ca­tion pre­dis­poses people to sup­port the bill. Fifty-one per­cent of blue-col­lar whites back a meas­ure pro­tect­ing trans­gendered and gay people, 12 points lower than the 63 per­cent of white-col­lar whites who do. Among non­whites, the split is 60-35.

And like gay rights, the le­gis­la­tion does pro­duce a pro­nounced gen­er­a­tion­al dif­fer­ence. Sup­port is over­whelm­ing among 18-to-29-year-olds, at 67-29 per­cent. That’s a 44-point shift from seni­or cit­izens, a plur­al­ity of whom — 48 per­cent — op­pose it. Forty-two per­cent of seni­ors back le­gis­la­tion that of­fers pro­tec­tions for gay and trans­gendered people.

In­ter­views for the United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll were con­duc­ted by land­line and cell phones with a na­tion­ally rep­res­ent­at­ive sample of 1,002 adults by Prin­ceton Sur­vey Re­search As­so­ci­ates In­ter­na­tion­al from Dec. 5-8. The mar­gin of er­ror for the poll was plus or minus 3.7 per­cent­age points.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×