Congress Shies Away From Telling Obama What to Do on Iran

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) talks to reporters as he arrives at a closed door briefing June 4, 2014 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Officials from the Obama Administration were on the Hill to brief Senate members on the release of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. 
National Journal
Clara Ritger
July 24, 2014, 4 p.m.

It’s not usu­ally hard to get law­makers to agree to tough lan­guage on Ir­an, par­tic­u­larly when AIPAC is on board.

But a let­ter out­lining the con­di­tions Ir­an must meet in or­der for Con­gress to be will­ing to provide sanc­tions re­lief ap­pears to have gone too far.

Demo­crat­ic Sen. Robert Men­en­dez and Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham were seek­ing sig­na­tures by Ju­ly 16 for the let­ter, backed by the Amer­ic­an Is­rael Pub­lic Af­fairs Com­mit­tee, that was first dis­trib­uted Ju­ly 11, ac­cord­ing to Re­u­ters.

Two weeks later””and one week after the six-na­tion ne­go­ti­at­ing group an­nounced it had ex­ten­ded the nuc­le­ar talks with Ir­an to Nov. 24””the let­ter still has not been sent to Pres­id­ent Obama.

Some sen­at­ors are wary that af­fix­ing their sig­na­ture to the doc­u­ment would frus­trate the nuc­le­ar talks and would mean that they must con­demn any deal that does not meet all of the enu­mer­ated cri­ter­ia. Among those are a 20-year, in­trus­ive in­spec­tions re­gime that would al­low the mem­bers of the P5+1 to in­de­pend­ently veri­fy Ir­a­ni­an com­pli­ance and the re­quire­ment that Ir­an dis­close the full ex­tent of its nuc­le­ar pro­gram be­fore re­ceiv­ing sanc­tions re­lief from Con­gress. The let­ter also states that Con­gress ex­pects to phase in the sanc­tions re­lief be­cause it does not trust Ir­an to re­spect the terms of the deal.

The let­ter mir­rors one sent in March by Men­en­dez of New Jer­sey and Gra­ham of South Car­o­lina, along with 81 of their col­leagues, ex­cept that the Ju­ly let­ter ex­pli­citly states con­di­tions of a deal, with the threat that “Our will­ing­ness to con­sider le­gis­la­tion to provide sanc­tions re­lief will be based on res­ol­u­tion of all of these is­sues in the con­text of a fi­nal agree­ment with Ir­an.”

Gra­ham said that sign­ing his name means he would vote down a deal that did not meet the cri­ter­ia ex­pressed in the let­ter.

Earli­er this week, he es­tim­ated that they had gathered 20 sig­na­tures. Gra­ham said they aim to send it to the pres­id­ent when they hit 30, and that he be­lieved it could be sent Thursday.

“We’re not try­ing to get 100,” Gra­ham said. “This let­ter’s tough­er and we’re try­ing to get the com­mit­tees of primary jur­is­dic­tion to send a sig­nal to the White House.”

But lead­ers on both sides of the aisle in the rel­ev­ant com­mit­tees””Bank­ing, For­eign Re­la­tions, and Armed Ser­vices””re­fuse to sign on.

“I don’t want to do any­thing to un­der­mine the ne­go­ti­ations,” said Demo­crat­ic Sen. Carl Lev­in of Michigan, the chair of the Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee. “I think it’s a mis­take to put in stone what I would vote against un­less cer­tain cri­ter­ia were met.”

For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Bob Cork­er, a Ten­ness­ee Re­pub­lic­an, also has not signed the let­ter. Nor has Armed Ser­vices rank­ing mem­ber James In­hofe, an Ok­lahoma Re­pub­lic­an, though he did send his own let­ter us­ing stronger lan­guage about the ne­go­ti­ations.

“There’s not a good deal be­cause if Ir­an agrees to something, they will break their word,” In­hofe said when asked what he would like to see in a Novem­ber deal. “It’s a waste of time.”

Bank­ing Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Mike Crapo, an Idaho Re­pub­lic­an who signed the March let­ter, signed onto the latest let­ter. But Bank­ing Chair­man Tim John­son, a Demo­crat from South Dakota, said he’s nev­er seen it.

Oth­er key Demo­crats are dis­tan­cing them­selves from the let­ter, in­clud­ing Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hamp­shire.

“I have not signed onto that let­ter,” said Shaheen, a mem­ber of the Armed Ser­vices and For­eign Re­la­tions com­mit­tees who did sign the March let­ter. “I think this let­ter is more pre­script­ive. I’m not go­ing to spec­u­late on what should be in the deal with Ir­an.”

Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Is­land also signed on in March but hasn’t signed the Ju­ly let­ter. Reed serves on the Bank­ing and Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tees.

“I think the let­ter makes some good points,” Reed said, “but I think that any ne­go­ti­ation has to be a give and take and you have to al­low the ne­go­ti­at­ors to reach a po­s­i­tion and then eval­u­ate if it is ef­fect­ive.”

But even Re­pub­lic­ans who agreed to the March let­ter, such as Sen. Jeff Ses­sions of Alabama, thought the latest let­ter went too far. Ses­sions, a mem­ber of the Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, said he wanted to give the pres­id­ent the chance to present and ar­gue for his deal.

“I don’t want to gra­tu­it­ously con­demn or throw out sug­ges­tions as to what the right solu­tion should be,” Ses­sions said. “I think the pres­id­ent should ne­go­ti­ate something and I think he should run it by Con­gress.”

What We're Following See More »
‘LOTS OF MEETINGS’
Hill Dems Mull Dropping Wasserman Schultz
15 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

Concerned that she's become too divisive, "Democrats on Capitol Hill are discussing whether Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should step down as Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman before the party’s national convention in July. ... Wasserman Schultz has had an increasingly acrimonious relationship with the party’s other presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, and his supporters, who argue she has tilted the scales in Clinton’s favor." The money quote, from a Democratic senator who backs Clinton: “There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on." Meanwhile, Newsweek takes a look at why no one seems to like Wasserman Schultz.

Source:
PRESIDENT PLEDGES VETO
House Votes Today on Bill to Strip Budget Autonomy from DC
15 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"The U.S. House of Representatives plans to vote Wednesday on a Republican bill that would block the District of Columbia from spending locally raised tax revenue without congressional approval, prompting President Obama to pledge to veto it. In issuing the veto threat on Tuesday, the Obama White House made one of the strongest statements to date in support of the District’s attempt to win financial independence from Congress."

Source:
HE ‘WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT’
Warren Goes After Trump Yet Again
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage. 

LEVERAGE
Kasich Tells His Delegates to Remain Pledged to Him
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."

Source:
LOST BY HALF A PERCENTAGE POINT
Sanders Wants a Recount in Kentucky
18 hours ago
THE LATEST

Bernie Sanders "signed a letter Tuesday morning requesting a full and complete check and recanvass of the election results in Kentucky ... where he trails Hillary Clinton by less than one-half of 1 percent of the vote. The Sanders campaign said it has asked the Kentucky secretary of state to have election officials review electronic voting machines and absentee ballots from last week's primary in each of the state's 120 counties.

Source:
×