The Uncontroversial Policies at the Heart of the Border Crisis

Behind the surge in unaccompanied minors at the U.S. border is a series of laws crafted over a decade.

Anti-immigration activists protest outside of the U.S. Border Patrol Murrieta Station on July 7, 2014 in Murrieta, California. 
National Journal
Fawn Johnson
July 8, 2014, 12:29 a.m.

The situ­ation at the U.S.-Mex­ico bor­der has bal­looned, polit­ic­ally and lo­gist­ic­ally. Pres­id­ent Obama has de­clared it an emer­gency and is ask­ing Con­gress for $3.7 bil­lion to handle the care, pro­cessing, and ad­ju­dic­a­tion of tens of thou­sands of Cent­ral Amer­ic­an un­ac­com­pan­ied minors who have been ap­pre­hen­ded at the bor­der in the last few months. This week, the Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee will hear from the sec­ret­ar­ies of State, Health and Hu­man Ser­vices, and the De­part­ment of Home­land Se­cur­ity to in­quire about the pres­id­ent’s re­quest.

The pres­id­ent asked Con­gress on Tues­day for the ex­tra funds to bol­ster the bor­der se­cur­ity per­son­nel in the Rio Grande Val­ley and pay for pro­cessing and trans­port­a­tion of un­doc­u­mented mi­grants who must be as­sessed be­fore they are re­leased in­to the cus­tody of a fam­ily mem­ber or sent back to their home coun­tries. That means ad­di­tion­al im­mig­ra­tion judges, pro­sec­utors, and at­tor­neys to en­sure the pro­cess goes smoothly and quickly.

How did we get here? The in­flux of un­doc­u­mented teens from Guatem­ala, El Sal­vador, and Hon­dur­as over the last six months can­not be defin­it­ively tied to any policy change in­side the United States, al­though sev­er­al crit­ics have tried to make that con­nec­tion. Obama’s de­ferred-ac­tion pro­gram for un­doc­u­mented young adults brought here years ago as chil­dren is al­most two years old. Even though the Sen­ate did pass a broad im­mig­ra­tion bill last year, there was no sim­il­ar surge in bor­der cross­ings when it passed sim­il­ar le­gis­la­tion in 2006. And last year’s le­gis­la­tion, of course, died in the House.

Still, the back­log in hand­ling the un­ac­com­pan­ied minors is def­in­itely an out­growth of gen­er­ally non­con­tro­ver­sial policy changes over the past 10 years that have res­ul­ted in a bot­tle­neck in pro­cessing at the bor­der.

What’s more, those changes were meant to treat bor­der-cross­ing de­tain­ees hu­manely, re­spons­ibly, and in closer con­junc­tion with the law.

First, a non­con­tro­ver­sial anti-hu­man-traf­fick­ing law that passed Con­gress un­an­im­ously in 2008 made it more dif­fi­cult to send un­doc­u­mented un­ac­com­pan­ied minors back to their home coun­tries, es­pe­cially if they wer­en’t from the coun­tries that bor­der the United States. Pre­vi­ously, all un­ac­com­pan­ied minors were re­quired to be ques­tioned by bor­der patrol to en­sure that they were not part of a traf­fick­ing ring and would will­ingly go home without pun­ish­ment. But there wasn’t an ef­fort to loc­ate someone who might already be in the United States to care for them.

Now there is. As a res­ult of the 2008 law, bor­der of­fi­cials now are re­quired to turn over un­ac­com­pan­ied minors to De­part­ment of Health and Hu­man Ser­vices of­fi­cials, who then make a con­cer­ted ef­fort to find a fam­ily mem­ber or guard­i­an in­side the United States to whom the chil­dren can be re­leased.

In oth­er words, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment, by law, is in the busi­ness of re­unit­ing chil­dren with their fam­il­ies. In 2008, no one thought that was a bad idea. (The same re­uni­fic­a­tion pro­cess of­ten isn’t im­me­di­ately avail­able to kids who cross the bor­der from Mex­ico, be­cause Mex­ico has spe­cial re­pat­ri­ation agree­ments with the United States. Still, U.S. au­thor­it­ies are re­quired to re­lease those chil­dren to Mex­ic­an wel­fare of­fi­cials.)

Many kids are now com­ing to the United States to meet fam­ily mem­bers, some of whom have been here for years. The Mi­gra­tion Policy In­sti­tute re­cently es­tim­ated that 85 to 90 per­cent of the un­ac­com­pan­ied minors cross­ing the bor­der from Cent­ral Amer­ica can be placed with a close re­l­at­ive or par­ent in­side the United States. Some of those re­l­at­ives are here il­leg­ally, but oth­ers are here leg­ally un­der “Tem­por­ary Pro­tec­ted Status” visas””spe­cial ac­com­mod­a­tions gran­ted to im­mig­rants from coun­tries deemed to have sub­stan­tial nat­ur­al dis­asters or on­go­ing armed con­flicts.

Tem­por­ary Pro­tec­ted Status has been a long­time policy of the United States, and is also largely non­con­tro­ver­sial. The U.S. gran­ted El Sal­vador TPS status in 2001. Hon­dur­as has had it since 1998. Adults who come to the coun­try un­der this law aren’t al­lowed to pe­ti­tion to bring their chil­dren here, but they can re­new their own leg­al status as many times as they need to. If they have been here for a while, chances are the ba­bies they left at home have grown up and now may be able to sur­vive a jour­ney to the United States.

Then there’s the is­sue of the back­log. At the be­gin­ning of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, the U.S. Cus­toms and Bor­der Patrol began in­sti­tut­ing new pro­cesses to stop people who were caught from at­tempt­ing to cross the bor­der again. Un­der the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion, cap­tured ali­ens of­ten were “vol­un­tar­ily re­moved” to Mex­ico with noth­ing in their re­cords but a book­keep­ing rep­rim­and, the equi­val­ent of a park­ing tick­et. Some bor­der agents said they en­countered the same cross­ers more than once dur­ing an eight-hour shift. (For a longer over­view of bor­der ef­forts early on in the ad­min­is­tra­tion, see this fea­ture from Na­tion­al Journ­al in 2012.)

Early on, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion re­spon­ded to cri­tiques about the bor­der-cross­ing re­cidiv­ism with harsh­er pen­al­ties for il­leg­al entrants. In Ari­zona, one of the busiest areas for pro­cessing un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants, about 90 per­cent of those now ap­pre­hen­ded are placed in­to a new and poin­tedly named “con­sequence de­liv­ery sys­tem.” The pro­gram as­signs as­cend­ing levels of pun­ish­ment to re­peat cross­ers.

All of this new pro­cessing takes time and money. It is more in­volved than simply load­ing up a bus and empty­ing it across the bor­der a few miles away, but also ar­gu­ably bet­ter in tune with the law. Chil­dren are giv­en more at­ten­tion and pro­tec­tions un­der the new hu­man-traf­fick­ing law, which also makes sense to most people.

But to handle it all, the bor­der patrol needs to be run­ning like a well-oiled ma­chine. The Tuc­son de­ten­tion fa­cil­ity has an im­mig­ra­tion judge onsite to handle the case­load. Buses come daily with new loads of people who were picked up along the bor­der. When it works well, it’s still a lot of pa­per­work. When there’s steep rise in bor­der cross­ings, as there has been over the last few months, it’s easy to see how the sys­tem can get over­whelmed.

This story was up­dated at 12:10 p.m. on Tues­day with news on the White House’s re­quest for funds.

What We're Following See More »
WORDS AND PICTURES
White House Looks Back on bin Laden Mission
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
NO BATTLE OVER SEATTLE
SCOTUS Won’t Hear Appeal of Minimum-Wage Law
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a sweeping constitutional challenge to Seattle’s minimum wage law, in what could have been a test case for future legal attacks on similar measures across the country. In a one-line order, the justices declined to hear a case by the International Franchise Association and a group of Seattle franchisees, which had said in court papers that the city’s gradual wage increase to $15 discriminates against them in a way that violates the Constitution’s commerce clause."

Source:
DOWN TO THE WIRE
Sanders Looks to Right the Ship in Indiana
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Hillary Clinton may have the Democratic nomination sewn up, but Bernie Sanders apparently isn't buying it. Buoyed by a poll showing them in a "virtual tie," Sanders is "holding three rallies on the final day before the state primary and hoping to pull off a win after a tough week of election losses and campaign layoffs." 

Source:
CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION IN JUNE
DC to Release Draft Constitution as Part of Statehood Push
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The New Columbia Statehood Commission—composed of five District leaders including Mayor Muriel Bowser, D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, and D.C.'s congressional delegation—voted today to publicly release a draft of a new constitution for an eventual state next Friday, at the Lincoln Cottage." It's the first step in a statehood push this year that will include a constitutional convention in June and a referendum in November.

Source:
ALZHEIMER’S OUTCRY
Will Ferrell Bails on Reagan Movie
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Amid outcry by President Reagan's children, actor Will Ferrell has pulled out of a movie that makes light of Reagan's Alzheimer's disease. A spokesperson for Ferrell said, “The ‘Reagan’ script is one of a number of scripts that had been submitted to Will Ferrell which he had considered. While it is by no means an ‘Alzheimer’s comedy’ as has been suggested, Mr. Ferrell is not pursuing this project."

Source:
×