Congressional Black Caucus Chair: Steve Israel ‘Doesn’t Really Value’ Us

The ongoing tension between the CBC and the DCCC gets personal.

National Journal
Sarah Mimms
June 25, 2014, 7:57 a.m.

Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee Chair­man Steve Is­rael has just over four months left to bring the House back un­der Demo­crat­ic con­trol. That will re­quire the com­mit­tee to turn out loy­al Afric­an-Amer­ic­an and His­pan­ic voters and work to di­ver­si­fy the caucus. But along the way, he’s fa­cing back­lash from the chair­wo­man of one of the House con­fer­ence’s most in­flu­en­tial groups: the Con­gres­sion­al Black Caucus.

Is­rael, Rep. Mar­cia Fudge says, does not rep­res­ent the Demo­crat­ic con­fer­ence in the House well. Fudge wouldn’t com­ment on what spe­cific­ally Is­rael had done, al­though sev­er­al strategists and mem­bers fa­mil­i­ar with the dis­pute poin­ted to an in­cid­ent in 2011. Is­rael had sched­uled a meet­ing with the CBC to ad­dress some of its mem­bers’ con­cerns with the com­mit­tee, but in what his staffers and even Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi de­scribed as a mis­state­ment, told mem­bers: “Can we win the House without the CBC? Yes. Do we want to win the House without the CBC? No.”

Al­though Is­rael apo­lo­gized and patched things up with then-CBC Chair­man Emanuel Cleav­er, the first part of that sen­tence has fol­lowed him ever since. “I have chosen to be­lieve that he made a dumb state­ment, and I think after it fell out of his lips, he prob­ably thought: ‘Oh, my good­ness,’ ” Cleav­er says. “I don’t think that that was ne­ces­sar­ily a re­flec­tion of who he is. However, it’s al­most like these emails: Once you send an email, it’s out there in cy­ber­space etern­ally. And so you know, every now and then when some­body has a bad ex­per­i­ence with the DCCC, at one of our meet­ings some­body will say, ‘Well, yeah, but you re­mem­ber he’s already told us that he doesn’t need us,’ ” Cleav­er said.

But Fudge said that she has many more griev­ances with Is­rael than just his 2011 com­ment, again de­clin­ing to elab­or­ate. “No, I mean, it’s a con­tinu­ing is­sue. It’s a con­tinu­ing is­sue that shows that he doesn’t really value “¦ our caucus. It’s a con­tinu­ing is­sue,” she said.

Fudge also told Roll Call last month she would not sup­port Is­rael in main­tain­ing a lead­er­ship po­s­i­tion with­in the House Demo­crat­ic con­fer­ence.

But in in­ter­views with mem­bers of the Con­gres­sion­al Black Caucus, it ap­pears that Fudge’s opin­ion is largely just her own. Sev­er­al CBC mem­bers de­clined to com­ment for this story or would not speak about the dis­pute on the re­cord. But of the half-dozen who did, none ex­pressed com­plaints about Is­rael. While many dis­cussed is­sues with the DCCC in gen­er­al, a few even praised Is­rael’s lead­er­ship there.

“I don’t have any com­plaints about him as chair. He works hard at it. I see him work­ing hard at it, and I sup­port what he does,” Rep. Wil­li­am Lacy Clay, D-Mo., said, adding that his re­la­tion­ship with the DCCC as a whole is a dif­fer­ent story en­tirely.

“For whatever reas­on, this seems to be per­son­al for Fudge, she just doesn’t like Is­rael,” a Demo­crat­ic strategist fa­mil­i­ar with the dis­pute said.

Dis­putes between the DCCC and the CBC are noth­ing new, however. The two com­mit­tees have been caught in a per­petu­al state of ten­sion for years, a ten­sion that will likely nev­er be fully de­fused. The CBC is a Demo­crat­ic power­house in Con­gress, but its mem­bers hail al­most ex­clus­ively from safe, Demo­crat­ic dis­tricts. As a res­ult, they can have a dif­fi­cult time rais­ing money for their own reelec­tions and are called upon to not only pay their reg­u­lar dues to the DCCC, but to fun­draise for the com­mit­tee as well. And be­cause their seats are so safe, they al­most nev­er see a penny re­turned to their own cam­paign cof­fers. “And you know you can’t move up to lead­er­ship po­s­i­tion and all the oth­er be­ne­fits [without giv­ing money to the DCCC],” Cleav­er said. “Yeah, that cre­ates a prob­lem. And so you know, I think — I mean the sur­prise should be if there were no prob­lems.”

The two com­mit­tees have clashed for years, with the fight­ing hit­ting its zenith in 2006 un­der then-DCCC Chair­man Rahm Emanuel, when mul­tiple mem­bers of the CBC took very pub­lic stands against the cur­rent Chica­go may­or. But that’s not what you’re see­ing now, a Demo­crat­ic strategist fa­mil­i­ar with both groups said.

Still, Cleav­er said, the ten­sions between the two com­mit­tees have been ex­acer­bated since Is­rael took over the DCCC, and par­tic­u­larly since Fudge took over the CBC. There have been a few heated ex­changes dur­ing the past two years, Cleav­er said, in which “things were said that are dif­fi­cult to erase.”

De­fend­ing the CBC is the chair’s job, Cleav­er said, and Fudge is more than his equal to the task. Cleav­er said that his own re­la­tion­ship with Is­rael has im­proved now that he is no longer re­spons­ible for the caucus. “When you’re chair of the CBC, you have to deal with every slight, every is­sue, every mo­ment that people be­lieve something un­just has happened. And you’ve got to de­fend your mem­bers…. I think Mar­cia Fudge is ex­tremely de­fens­ive — as she should be — of the CBC mem­bers,” he said.

Staffers at the DCCC strongly de­fen­ded their boss’s re­cord, par­tic­u­larly dur­ing this elec­tion cycle. “We are con­tinu­ally work­ing with our al­lies at the CBC, [the Con­gres­sion­al His­pan­ic Caucus], and [the Con­gres­sion­al Asi­an Pa­cific Amer­ic­an Caucus] to im­prove di­versity in our con­tract­ing and staff­ing, be­cause we want to re­flect our coun­try’s di­versity, both in who we elect to Con­gress and in who works with the DCCC,” Emily Bittner, the DCCC’s com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or, said in a state­ment to Na­tion­al Journ­al. “As head of the DCCC, Chair­man Is­rael takes these goals ser­i­ously and has hired the DCCC’s first-ever di­versity dir­ect­or, dir­ec­ted staff to work with the CBC and CHC to identi­fy minor­ity-owned vendors, and hired a na­tion­al train­ing dir­ect­or to share our job op­por­tun­it­ies with di­verse com­munit­ies across the coun­try.”

One of the Demo­crat­ic strategists fa­mil­i­ar with both com­mit­tees poin­ted out that the DCCC con­duc­ted a na­tion­al re­search sur­vey fo­cused on Afric­an-Amer­ic­an and His­pan­ic voters for the first time this year. The res­ults of that sur­vey, which gauged ef­fect­ive mes­saging for those groups, was made avail­able to Demo­crat­ic mem­bers, in­clud­ing those in the CBC, who could be­ne­fit from the re­search. “What the DCCC is do­ing right now is, I think, head and shoulders above what they’ve done in the past on di­versity and in­creas­ing di­versity on the com­mit­tee and in the races,” the strategist said.

But the group still has a long way to go, all sides ac­know­ledge. Power­PAC+, a Demo­crat­ic fun­drais­ing firm fo­cused on in­creas­ing di­versity, re­leased a sur­vey Wed­nes­day morn­ing show­ing that from 2009-12, more than 98 per­cent of funds spent by the three Demo­crat­ic com­mit­tees (the DCCC, the Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee, and the Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee) went to white vendors. Dur­ing that time, the groups used just 14 con­sult­ing firms that were even par­tially minor­ity-owned.

The DCCC says it is work­ing harder this cycle to im­prove those num­bers. The group reached out to the CBC to re­com­mend minor­ity-owned vendors to as­sist in the cam­paign com­mit­tee’s out­reach and help di­ver­si­fy their or­gan­iz­a­tion, one of the strategist’s said. But the CBC nev­er re­spon­ded.

“There have been over­tures by Is­rael to try to work things out with Fudge, and my un­der­stand­ing — it doesn’t seem like there’s a will­ing­ness by her to work things out. I think that’s un­for­tu­nate,” the first strategist said. “What I think is good to see is that she has been in­volved in the DCCC, she’s done a num­ber of events [for them this cycle].”

The strategists also poin­ted to Rep. Donna Ed­wards of Mary­land as a key bridge between the two com­mit­tees, and a smart hire by Is­rael. Ed­wards is a mem­ber of the CBC and was se­lec­ted by Is­rael to chair the DCCC’s Red to Blue pro­gram this cycle, a job that could put her in line to take over the cam­paign com­mit­tee when Is­rael steps down.

Ed­wards dis­missed ques­tions about Fudge’s com­ments as typ­ic­al of the “push and pull” between the DCCC and a vari­ety of caucuses. “We al­ways have dis­cus­sions about what our re­l­at­ive pri­or­it­ies are, what our in­terests are, and mak­ing sure those are shared and com­mon goals…. And so there’s a nat­ur­al push and pull that goes on as we’re try­ing to fig­ure out what our pri­or­it­ies are. And that’s no dif­fer­ent from the CBC, frankly, than it is with any of our oth­er caucuses,” she said. Ed­wards also noted that she has “a good re­la­tion­ship” with Is­rael.

Fudge praised Ed­wards’s work, both in Con­gress and with the DCCC but ad­ded that she’s still doesn’t be­lieve Is­rael is try­ing hard enough. “We ap­pre­ci­ate all the work that Donna does. I still do not be­lieve that we get the re­spect from the chair­man that we should get,” she said.

Cor­rec­tion: An earli­er ver­sion of this story misid­en­ti­fied Ed­wards as the chair­wo­man of the DCCC’s Front­line pro­gram. She heads the com­mit­tee’s Red to Blue pro­gram.

What We're Following See More »
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
1 days ago

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
1 days ago

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
22 hours ago

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
9 hours ago

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.