What Happened Inside the House GOP Leadership Election

Midnight calls. Headcounting by clipboard. Speeches to secure every key vote. Scalise’s route to the win showed his skill as a whip.

U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) (L) speaks to members of the media as Speaker of the House Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) (R) listens after a leadership election at a House Republican Conference meeting June 19, 2014 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. House GOPs have picked Majority Whip Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) as the new House majority leader and Scalise as the new majority whip. 
National Journal
Tim Alberta
June 19, 2014, 4:34 p.m.

The doors flung open and a steely-eyed Steve Scal­ise emerged, look­ing part-politi­cian and part-prize fight­er, “Eye of the Ti­ger” blast­ing from be­hind him, as he shuffled his feet and made his way to the ring.

Well, it wasn’t ex­actly a ring; the bout was to be held in­side the Ways and Means Com­mit­tee hear­ing room in the Long­worth House Of­fice Build­ing. But the op­u­lent set­ting did little to al­ter the ap­pear­ance of an im­min­ent brawl. Scal­ise and his army of dark-suited sup­port­ers had marched to Long­worth to­geth­er across an empty street, and upon ar­riv­ing they seemed to be search­ing for a rival gang to rumble with.

The main event was draw­ing all the at­ten­tion, but as al­ways, there would first be an un­der­card. Iron­ic­ally, in this case, the less con­ten­tious con­test was for the big­ger prize: the ma­jor­ity lead­er’s of­fice be­ing va­cated by Eric Can­tor.

Ma­jor­ity Whip Kev­in Mc­Carthy, the odds-on fa­vor­ite whose ex­per­i­ence had pre­pared him per­fectly for this mo­ment, squared off with Rep. Raul Lab­rador, the scrappy un­der­dog who nev­er had a chance. Each em­ployed a pop­u­lar con­ser­vat­ive to de­liv­er a nom­in­at­ing ad­dress — Rep. Tom Graves was in Mc­Carthy’s corner while Rep. Jim Jordan sided with Lab­rador — and then some second­ing speeches were giv­en for good meas­ure.

It was nev­er a fair fight. Jordan gave a strong speech, ar­guing that “people are scared” and look­ing for bold lead­er­ship. It cap­tiv­ated the room and in­spired fleet­ing il­lu­sions of vic­tory. But an up­set wasn’t meant to be. Mc­Carthy won — prob­ably by knock­out. Though some mem­bers pushed for the tally to be re­leased, the pro­pos­al was dis­missed, and Lab­rador in an act of sports­man­ship asked that the re­cord re­flect a un­an­im­ous win for Mc­Carthy.

The comity wouldn’t last. Mc­Carthy’s win meant his job, ma­jor­ity whip, would soon be va­cated. This was the con­test every­one came to see. Three can­did­ates — Reps. Scal­ise of Louisi­ana, Peter Roskam of Illinois, and Marlin Stutz­man of In­di­ana — would com­pete for the post, but all eyes were on Scal­ise. He had been the fa­vor­ite throughout, amass­ing an enorm­ous team of sup­port­ers and run­ning a well-oiled whip­ping ma­chine that saw law­makers mak­ing mid­night calls and aides with clip­boards count­ing heads at Thursday’s meet­ing.

Scal­ise was con­fid­ent, and every­one knew it. The night be­fore he’d dined with dozens of sup­port­ers at a Louisi­ana fish joint, thank­ing them for their tire­less work and hand­ing out cus­tom­ized base­ball bats to com­mem­or­ate their im­pend­ing vic­tory. The bats, made by a com­pany in Scal­ise’s back­yard, were en­graved: “Bring the Wood…Scal­ise Whip Team 2014…Geaux!!!”

No one doubted Scal­ise was the front-run­ner com­ing in. The only ques­tion was wheth­er he could win a ma­jor­ity — 116 of the 231 votes be­ing cast — to claim an out­right vic­tory and avoid a second bal­lot. Roskam and Stutz­man knew they couldn’t beat him ini­tially; their only hope was to force a head-to-head run­off, and then hope to steal a huge bloc of sup­port­ers from the elim­in­ated last-place can­did­ate.

They were nom­in­ated in al­pha­bet­ic­al or­der. Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Car­o­lina, who’s lead­ing a se­lect com­mit­tee in­vest­ig­a­tion on the events in Benghazi, praised his pan­el­ist, Roskam, as a col­lab­or­at­or who brings mem­bers to­geth­er. Rep. Kev­in Brady of Texas, a soft-spoken con­ser­vat­ive who com­mands re­spect throughout the con­fer­ence, vouched for the per­son­al de­cency of his room­mate, Scal­ise. Fi­nally, Rep. Tom Reed, an alum­nus of Stutz­man’s class of 2010, touted the Hoo­si­er’s com­mit­ment to an open policy-mak­ing pro­cess — and drew the loudest cheers of the af­ter­noon by sa­lut­ing Can­tor, their out­go­ing lead­er.

But the strength of Scal­ise’s co­ali­tion was too much to over­come. As evid­enced by his choice of sec­ond­ary speak­ers — Kristi Noem, prov­ing his pop­ular­ity among high-pro­file Re­pub­lic­an wo­men; and Bill Shuster, a key mem­ber of the up-for-grabs Pennsylvania del­eg­a­tion — Scal­ise had every demo­graph­ic covered. South­ern­ers, wo­men, Mid­west­ern­ers, con­ser­vat­ives, mod­er­ates — he won them all.

Team Scal­ise smelled vic­tory in the air. A small le­gion of aides and sup­port­ers — in­clud­ing vo­lun­teers who hadn’t got­ten paid to work late nights and long hours on Scal­ise’s be­half — crowded the hall­ways out­side the Long­worth meet­ing room, cam­er­as in hand to doc­u­ment the mo­ment, wait­ing to ex­plode.

Soon they got their chance. A massive cheer went up in­side the room as Con­fer­ence Chair­wo­man Cathy Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers an­nounced that Scal­ise had won the elec­tion out­right, and mo­ments later, Scal­ise’s sup­port­ers erup­ted in the hall­way.

Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship had a new top three.

Mc­Carthy and Scal­ise took turns at the po­di­um be­hind closed doors, the lead­er-elect and whip-elect ad­dress­ing their col­leagues for the first time from their new perches. Then they broke through a me­dia gaunt­let and ex­ecuted a brief press con­fer­ence, mak­ing prom­ises and thank­ing col­leagues and smil­ing for the cam­er­as. It ended ab­ruptly and the vic­tors went their sep­ar­ate ways, trailed by re­port­ers ask­ing ques­tions about what comes next and wheth­er they’re wor­ried about the up­com­ing round of con­fer­ence elec­tions in Novem­ber.

The smiles dis­ap­peared. That’s the thing about heavy­weight bouts — there’s al­ways a re­match right around the corner.

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
8 hours ago
THE LATEST
×